All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	sbsiddha@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, hughd@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: + mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:57:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201218185738.Si9qJ%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: generalise COW SMC TLB flushing race comment
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: mm: generalise COW SMC TLB flushing race comment

I'm not sure if I'm completely missing something here, but AFAIKS the
reference to the mysterious "COW SMC race" confuses the issue.  The
original changelog and mailing list thread didn't help me either.

This SMC race is where the problem was detected, but isn't the general
problem bigger and more obvious: that the new PTE could be picked up at
any time by any TLB while entries for the old PTE exist in other TLBs
before the TLB flush takes effect?

The case where the iTLB and dTLB of a CPU are pointing at different pages
is an interesting one but follows from the general problem.

The other (minor) thing with the comment I think it makes it a bit clearer
to say what the old code was doing (i.e., it avoids the race as opposed to
what?).

References: 4ce072f1faf29 ("mm: fix a race condition under SMC + COW")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201215121119.351650-1-npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -2892,11 +2892,13 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm
 		entry = mk_pte(new_page, vma->vm_page_prot);
 		entry = pte_sw_mkyoung(entry);
 		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
+
 		/*
 		 * Clear the pte entry and flush it first, before updating the
-		 * pte with the new entry. This will avoid a race condition
-		 * seen in the presence of one thread doing SMC and another
-		 * thread doing COW.
+		 * pte with the new entry, to keep TLBs on different CPUs in
+		 * sync. This code used to set the new PTE then flush TLBs, but
+		 * that left a window where the new PTE could be loaded into
+		 * some TLBs while the old PTE remains in others.
 		 */
 		ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from npiggin@gmail.com are

mm-generalise-cow-smc-tlb-flushing-race-comment.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201218185738.Si9qJ%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.