From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF11C4361B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE59C23BC7 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726114AbgLRWC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:02:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35790 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726095AbgLRWC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:02:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:01:44 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1608328905; bh=q7V4wkxefHRJ/6RednrrO0fCQKQ+UWiSMvd+P3R8B44=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=EvNyMJDyW6TC9nhtxN3d2SAp0rJJGv8Qrd/IZ/KRkrBUhgiIgbeqkse1qNRa6XGi7 7OtCLaahGTKFU79THNXBRbA7Y2rE0VMuvRyrocvfY9hLkjmceJ+5i3EtKq6w75pqcn xnNZWxGRF+46CYGMjooYMssODHdkMCCoM4iHHg08= From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dbueso@suse.de, edumazet@google.com, guantaol@google.com, khazhy@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, soheil@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, willemb@google.com Subject: [patch 06/78] epoll: check for events when removing a timed out thread from the wait queue Message-ID: <20201218220144.2NepJeilo%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20201218140046.497484741326828e5b5d46ec@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Subject: epoll: check for events when removing a timed out thread from the wait queue Patch series "simplify ep_poll". This patch series is a followup based on the suggestions and feedback by Linus: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wizk=OxUyQPbO8MS41w2Pag1kniUV5WdD5qWL-gq1kjDA@mail.gmail.com The first patch in the series is a fix for the epoll race in presence of timeouts, so that it can be cleanly backported to all affected stable kernels. The rest of the patch series simplify the ep_poll() implementation. Some of these simplifications result in minor performance enhancements as well. We have kept these changes under self tests and internal benchmarks for a few days, and there are minor (1-2%) performance enhancements as a result. This patch (of 8): After abc610e01c66 ("fs/epoll: avoid barrier after an epoll_wait(2) timeout"), we break out of the ep_poll loop upon timeout, without checking whether there is any new events available. Prior to that patch-series we always called ep_events_available() after exiting the loop. This can cause races and missed wakeups. For example, consider the following scenario reported by Guantao Liu: Suppose we have an eventfd added using EPOLLET to an epollfd. Thread 1: Sleeps for just below 5ms and then writes to an eventfd. Thread 2: Calls epoll_wait with a timeout of 5 ms. If it sees an event of the eventfd, it will write back on that fd. Thread 3: Calls epoll_wait with a negative timeout. Prior to abc610e01c66, it is guaranteed that Thread 3 will wake up either by Thread 1 or Thread 2. After abc610e01c66, Thread 3 can be blocked indefinitely if Thread 2 sees a timeout right before the write to the eventfd by Thread 1. Thread 2 will be woken up from schedule_hrtimeout_range and, with evail 0, it will not call ep_send_events(). To fix this issue: 1) Simplify the timed_out case as suggested by Linus. 2) while holding the lock, recheck whether the thread was woken up after its time out has reached. Note that (2) is different from Linus' original suggestion: It do not set "eavail = ep_events_available(ep)" to avoid unnecessary contention (when there are too many timed-out threads and a small number of events), as well as races mentioned in the discussion thread. This is the first patch in the series so that the backport to stable releases is straightforward. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106231635.3528496-1-soheil.kdev@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wizk=OxUyQPbO8MS41w2Pag1kniUV5WdD5qWL-gq1kjDA@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106231635.3528496-2-soheil.kdev@gmail.com Fixes: abc610e01c66 ("fs/epoll: avoid barrier after an epoll_wait(2) timeout") Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Tested-by: Guantao Liu Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Reported-by: Guantao Liu Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn Reviewed-by: Khazhismel Kumykov Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- fs/eventpoll.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- a/fs/eventpoll.c~epoll-check-for-events-when-removing-a-timed-out-thread-from-the-wait-queue +++ a/fs/eventpoll.c @@ -1817,23 +1817,30 @@ fetch_events: } write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock); - if (eavail || res) - break; - - if (!schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS)) { - timed_out = 1; - break; - } - - /* We were woken up, thus go and try to harvest some events */ + if (!eavail && !res) + timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack, + HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); + + /* + * We were woken up, thus go and try to harvest some events. + * If timed out and still on the wait queue, recheck eavail + * carefully under lock, below. + */ eavail = 1; - } while (0); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (!list_empty_careful(&wait.entry)) { write_lock_irq(&ep->lock); + /* + * If the thread timed out and is not on the wait queue, it + * means that the thread was woken up after its timeout expired + * before it could reacquire the lock. Thus, when wait.entry is + * empty, it needs to harvest events. + */ + if (timed_out) + eavail = list_empty(&wait.entry); __remove_wait_queue(&ep->wq, &wait); write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock); } _