From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC36C433E0 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 03:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF8A22EBE for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 03:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725935AbgLUDHq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:07:46 -0500 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.130]:55646 "EHLO out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725782AbgLUDHp (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:07:45 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R171e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04400;MF=eguan@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UJCWX6L_1608520022; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:eguan@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UJCWX6L_1608520022) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:07:02 +0800 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:07:02 +0800 From: Eryu Guan To: Xiao Yang Cc: Eryu Guan , fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] fstests: master branch updated to 0ad1c034838d Message-ID: <20201221030702.GS80581@e18g06458.et15sqa> References: <5fdf8221.1c69fb81.8c656.9b9d@mx.google.com> <5FDFF40A.7090702@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5FDFF40A.7090702@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:02:02AM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > On 2020/12/21 0:55, Eryu Guan wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The master branch of the xfstests repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git > > > > have just been updated. As usual, this update contains some new tests and > > various bug fixes and improvements. > > > > New btrfs tests btrfs/154 and btrfs/227 all currently fail with latest kernel. > > And xfs/513 has been updated to catch a xfs bug, but it should pass with latest > > kenrel. > > > > Also, unionmount tests has been improved to run with custom overlay mount > > options by assigning $OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS to UNIONMOUNT_MNTOPTIONS. You need > > to update your local unionmount tests to latest to contain commit 95be14e > > ("Allow user provided options with or without -o") > > > > Thanks, > > Eryu > > > > The new head of the master branch is commit: > > > > 0ad1c034838d overlay: run unionmount tests with custom overlay mount options > > > > New commits: > > > > Amir Goldstein (1): > > [0ad1c034838d] overlay: run unionmount tests with custom overlay mount options > > > > Brian Foster (1): > > [62cf7ce77f4f] generic/563: use a loop device to avoid partition incompatibility > > > > Eric Biggers (1): > > [a225507009a3] generic: test for creating duplicate filenames in encrypted dir > > > > Feiyu Zhu (1): > > [0c5013c565b7] src/t_enospc.c: Fix an error for the loop initialization declaration > > > > Filipe Manana (1): > > [eabfcdfe9084] btrfs: test incremental send after removing a directory and all its files > > > > Kaixu Xia (1): > > [c2dd12732f31] xfs/513: fix the regression caused by mount option uqnoenforce > > > > Nikolay Borisov (1): > > [2a7406efecc2] btrfs: Update btrfs/215 > > > > Ritesh Harjani (1): > > [72dc169b442e] generic: Add test to check for mounting a huge sparse dm device > > > > Su Yue (1): > > [a633d252e3c4] shared/032: add options for jffs2 > > > > Xiao Yang (1): > > [90d76997831e] src/multi_open_unlink: Stop using attr_set > Hi Eryu, > > Only applying above patch broke the building of xfstests. :-) > See my explanation on the original patch set. Thanks for the heads-up! That's weird, I didn't see compile error in my testing.. Will look into that. Thanks, Eryu