On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> On 28/12/2020 17:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> >>> +#include <linux/property.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CIO2_HID                               "INT343E"
> >>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS                         4
> > 
> > This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead?
> 
> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and
> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the
> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from
> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h
> 
> Which do you prefer?

Actually ipu3-cio2.h misses a lot of inclusions (like mutex.h which I
immediately noticed when scrolled over data types). I think here should be a
compromise variant, split out something like ipu3-cio2-defs.h which can be
included in both ipu3-cio2.h and cio2-bridge.h.

And cio2-bridge.h needs more inclusions like types.h.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko