On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:55:45AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> > On 28/12/2020 17:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > >>> +#include <linux/property.h>
> > >>> +
> > >>> +#define CIO2_HID                               "INT343E"
> > >>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS                         4
> > > 
> > > This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead?
> > 
> > Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and
> > media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the
> > moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from
> > the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h
> > 
> > Which do you prefer?
> 
> Actually ipu3-cio2.h misses a lot of inclusions (like mutex.h which I
> immediately noticed when scrolled over data types). I think here should be a
> compromise variant, split out something like ipu3-cio2-defs.h which can be

Seems like cio2-defs.h more plausible name.

> included in both ipu3-cio2.h and cio2-bridge.h.
> 
> And cio2-bridge.h needs more inclusions like types.h.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko