All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:45:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201229061532.GB11717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bf586da0ac828353940c0d5a643bacbb4399d7b.1608648128.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:44 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions. We don't need to repeat
> "panel" here.
> 
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c  | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 11 +++++------
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 9ddbe8b8730b..83300ee8c3fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3556,7 +3556,7 @@ static void tgl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	 */
>  
>  	/* 2. Enable Panel Power if PPS is required */
> -	intel_edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_on(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * 3. For non-TBT Type-C ports, set FIA lane count
> @@ -3695,7 +3695,7 @@ static void hsw_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				 crtc_state->port_clock,
>  				 crtc_state->lane_count);
>  
> -	intel_edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_on(intel_dp);
>  
>  	intel_ddi_clk_select(encoder, crtc_state);
>  
> @@ -3937,8 +3937,8 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
>  		intel_ddi_disable_pipe_clock(old_crtc_state);
>  
> -	intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> -	intel_edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_off(intel_dp);
>  
>  	if (!intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, phy) ||
>  	    dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_TBT_ALT)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 9813fb7e109c..2052ee228077 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2947,10 +2947,10 @@ static void intel_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	/* Make sure the panel is off before trying to change the mode. But also
>  	 * ensure that we have vdd while we switch off the panel. */
> -	intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_vdd_on(intel_dp);
>  	intel_edp_backlight_off(old_conn_state);
>  	intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D3);
> -	intel_edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_off(intel_dp);
>  }
>  
>  static void g4x_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> @@ -5899,7 +5899,7 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>  			 * something nasty with it.
>  			 */
>  			intel_dp_pps_init(intel_dp);
> -			intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> +			intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -6073,7 +6073,7 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
>  
>  	if (dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP &&
> -	    (long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_power(intel_dp))) {
> +	    (long_hpd || !intel_pps_have_power(intel_dp))) {
>  		/*
>  		 * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which
>  		 * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we
> @@ -6631,7 +6631,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) {
>  		intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(intel_dp);
>  		intel_dp_pps_init(intel_dp);
> -		intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> +		intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 0edda87dee94..1f8ea3c41440 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static  u32 ilk_get_pp_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  /*
>   * Must be paired with edp_panel_vdd_off().
>   * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> - * Can be nested with intel_edp_panel_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> + * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
>   */
>  bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> @@ -619,13 +619,13 @@ bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Must be paired with intel_edp_panel_vdd_off() or
> - * intel_edp_panel_off().
> + * Must be paired with intel_pps_vdd_off() or
IMHO can we change the comment, there is no function with name intel_pps_vdd_off()
Thanks,
Anshuman.
> + * intel_pps_off().
>   * Nested calls to these functions are not allowed since
>   * we drop the lock. Caller must use some higher level
>   * locking to prevent nested calls from other threads.
>   */
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  	bool vdd;
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  /*
>   * Must be paired with edp_panel_vdd_on().
>   * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> - * Can be nested with intel_edp_panel_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> + * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
>   */
>  void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
>  {
> @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -void intel_edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  
> @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  				fetch_and_zero(&intel_dp->vdd_wakeref));
>  }
>  
> -void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(intel_dp, true);
>  }
>  
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(intel_dp);
>  }
>  
> -bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  	bool have_power = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 81e4e9fc3cf5..69f670678d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -34,12 +34,11 @@ void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work);
>  
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void intel_edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  void wait_panel_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-29  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22 14:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 11:22   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-04 14:46     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44       ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 10:57   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:12   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:15   ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2021-01-08 17:45     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:35   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:47   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:46     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_reinit() Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:04   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 10:33     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 10:59       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  8:01   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 15:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Patchwork
2020-12-22 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-22 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201229061532.GB11717@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.