From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0255CC433E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67DD8233CF for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:11:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 67DD8233CF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:42718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxpgK-000119-8q for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 06:11:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxpfF-0000Us-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 06:10:41 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxpfD-00088S-7p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 06:10:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610104238; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MN2ncVoUKe/bQdK02qw2407ov+jt8DZ1BYGp5oIDYFI=; b=IOsXxqVk+j9Qbc9MeprFF1oZBLfYsO2OOQrPRnPxSazgTxCUbm8dCXAkPkheCwcXP3Ivj9 /NG2r82OGRQ78vXv0S02l9hhSglGEYjIvxmB197YfOLEXxqK18mjQeTw3NI8C76le43nG/ NMTQWnp/UtYMX6E+kaIOngJQp4CUKLs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-337--1YWe36OORuD6nx3zWtNSg-1; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 06:10:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: -1YWe36OORuD6nx3zWtNSg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F07A1006C83; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-114-227.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.227]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DADBB5C8AA; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:10:24 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ci: ensure that all jobs use a shallow clone Message-ID: <20210108111024.GG1082385@redhat.com> References: <20210107171719.477856-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20210107182812.GI1029501@redhat.com> <20210108101645.GE1082385@redhat.com> <29312927-eb21-dab0-cea2-c2c9139a3e0c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <29312927-eb21-dab0-cea2-c2c9139a3e0c@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.246, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:06:01PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 08/01/2021 11.16, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > IOW, despite travis giving us non-x86 builders, it is doomed to be > > unusuable, unless we can convince them to give us a *massively* > > larger free credit allowance on the qemu account. > I think convincing them to do this will be very hard. I've tried to apply to > the free OSS credits for my account, and in the mail that I've got back > after a couple of weeks, they wrote that "Project must not be sponsored by a > commercial company or organization (monetary or with employees paid to work > on the project)" to qualify for the free credits. That doesn't sound like > they'll accept QEMU, I think. Yeah that makes their OSS program unviable for any project which isn't essentially just a single person free time effort. Lets drop Travis and not waste any more time on this. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|