From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5857C433E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3A623A63 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728610AbhAHSIw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60742 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728605AbhAHSIv (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:51 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB53FC061380 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:08:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id D06D26EEC; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org D06D26EEC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1610129290; bh=5Im3bgmhSNF5hjc4+3bwmlqosV1VSJQfvJ8j6NPzti8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AdO/VYR0MWTK0tpc/tP3qYq04GJJtt5WdxDHnlf/PdiUKJDfrd6HKCmCUJEBANxNf 1USWyrCST3hfHvd77dnlcXvnMmrTZEmZVP9QCVWRMzVfHR09a9eZyu49i4bIyVyVEE ibdYTMgYLVAzeas6um5pxHlt71AGeRtdgW/CtEhU= Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:10 -0500 From: "bfields@fieldses.org" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/42] Update NFSD XDR functions Message-ID: <20210108180810.GA10654@fieldses.org> References: <160986050640.5532.16498408936966394862.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> <20210108031800.GA13604@fieldses.org> <20210108155209.GC4183@fieldses.org> <20210108160145.GD4183@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Just ignore generic/465. As far as NFS is concerned, the test has > utterly borked assumptions about O_DIRECT ordering. Thanks, adding to my list of tests to skip. Should we report it as an xfstests bug? (Is the test just wrong, or is this some non-standard but documented NFS behavior, or something else?) --b.