All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Qian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:39:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210110153956.GD1106298@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8171f5a5a8b407a1fcca56bab912555bde80d323.camel@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then fffffffffffffffe
> > is "accessed" from VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> > 
> > It seems to me that we are not initializing struct pages for holes at the node
> > boundaries because zones are already clamped to exclude those holes.
> > 
> > Can you please try to see if the patch below will produce any useful info:
> 
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 8c, epfn: 9b, zone: DMA, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 1f7be, epfn: 1f9fe, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 28784, epfn: 288e4, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 298b9, epfn: 298bd, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29923, epfn: 29931, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29933, epfn: 29941, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29945, epfn: 29946, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29ff9, epfn: 2a823, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 33a23, epfn: 33a53, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 78000, epfn: 100000, zone: DMA32, node: 0
> ...
> [  572.222563][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47f380 is poisoned
...
> [  590.570032][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47ffff is poisoned
> [  604.268653][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  604.611698][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ffbc is poisoned
> [  617.484205][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  618.212344][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ffff is poisoned
> [  633.134228][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  633.874087][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ffff is poisoned
> [  647.686412][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  648.425548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ffff is poisoned
> [  663.692630][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  664.432671][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ffff is poisoned
> [  675.462757][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  676.202548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ffff is poisoned
> [  687.121605][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ff80 is poisoned
...
> [  687.860981][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ffff is poisoned

The e820 map has a hole near the end of each node and these holes are not
initialized with init_unavailable_range() after it was interleaved with
memmap initialization because such holes are not accounted by
zone->spanned_pages.

Yet, I'm still cannot really understand how this never triggered 

	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);

before v5.7 as all the struct pages for these holes would have zone=0 and
node=0 ... 

@Qian, can you please boot your system with memblock=debug and share the
logs?

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-10 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09 21:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2020-12-09 21:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memblock: enforce overlap of memory.memblock and memory.reserved Mike Rapoport
2020-12-10  9:28   ` Greg KH
2020-12-14 10:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-14 11:12     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-14 11:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-14 13:58         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2020-12-09 21:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2020-12-10  1:51   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2020-12-10  9:29   ` Greg KH
2021-01-04 19:03   ` Qian Cai
2021-01-04 19:03     ` Qian Cai
2021-01-05  8:24     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-05 18:45       ` Qian Cai
2021-01-05 18:45         ` Qian Cai
2021-01-06  8:05         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-06 21:04           ` Qian Cai
2021-01-06 21:04             ` Qian Cai
2021-01-10 15:39             ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-01-11 15:06               ` Qian Cai
2021-01-11 15:06                 ` Qian Cai
2021-01-11 17:47                 ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210110153956.GD1106298@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=qcai@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.