[PATCH net v3] ppp: fix refcount underflow on channel unbridge

* [PATCH net v3] ppp: fix refcount underflow on channel unbridge
@ 2021-01-07 18:13 Tom Parkin
  2021-01-08 20:57 ` Guillaume Nault
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Parkin @ 2021-01-07 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: gnault, jchapman, Tom Parkin

When setting up a channel bridge, ppp_bridge_channels sets the
pch->bridge field before taking the associated reference on the bridge
file instance.

This opens up a refcount underflow bug if ppp_bridge_channels called
via. iotcl runs concurrently with ppp_unbridge_channels executing via.
file release.

The bug is triggered by ppp_bridge_channels taking the error path
through the 'err_unset' label.  In this scenario, pch->bridge is set,
but the reference on the bridged channel will not be taken because
the function errors out.  If ppp_unbridge_channels observes pch->bridge
before it is unset by the error path, it will erroneously drop the
reference on the bridged channel and cause a refcount underflow.

To avoid this, ensure that ppp_bridge_channels holds a reference on
each channel in advance of setting the bridge pointers.

Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Fixes: 4cf476ced45d ("ppp: add PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN and PPPIOCUNBRIDGECHAN ioctls")
---
v3:
 * remove bool tracking variable in ppp_bridge_channels and re-read
   pch->bridge instead
 * add missing tags
v2:
 * rework ppp_bridge_channels code to avoid the race condition in
   preference to holding ppp_mutex while calling ppp_unbridge_channels
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index 09c27f7773f9..d445ecb1d0c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ static int ppp_bridge_channels(struct channel *pch, struct channel *pchb)
 		write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 		return -EALREADY;
 	}
+	refcount_inc(&pchb->file.refcnt);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(pch->bridge, pchb);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 
@@ -632,19 +633,24 @@ static int ppp_bridge_channels(struct channel *pch, struct channel *pchb)
 		write_unlock_bh(&pchb->upl);
 		goto err_unset;
 	}
+	refcount_inc(&pch->file.refcnt);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(pchb->bridge, pch);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pchb->upl);
 
-	refcount_inc(&pch->file.refcnt);
-	refcount_inc(&pchb->file.refcnt);
-
 	return 0;
 
 err_unset:
 	write_lock_bh(&pch->upl);
+	/* Re-read pch->bridge with upl held in case it was modified concurrently */
+	pchb = rcu_dereference_protected(pch->bridge, lockdep_is_held(&pch->upl));
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(pch->bridge, NULL);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 	synchronize_rcu();
+
+	if (pchb)
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pchb->file.refcnt))
+			ppp_destroy_channel(pchb);
+
 	return -EALREADY;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread