From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706A9C433E9 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B07122D04 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391292AbhAKTx0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:53:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51004 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391265AbhAKTxZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:53:25 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78DFAC06179F; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:52:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from lwn.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26691728; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:52:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 26691728 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1610394765; bh=+w50x7FXB4+mpahBlBjhsoFALsTddz8oIotgBm1N3hI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Qgz8dQ7x4x8P2fwtNVtFqYu0WFylWrFtD/1pU6UpZjtGrGbaO/t3le05uE7xtsbPw xm3u131Px9OaUvFTXoGWhhnjPzflmuvB0RsmqEyq6ajnz+dBylUtIOxNC9F3eeBRK8 5Htj+y6iHNDxL6QMphu5XjM9iCDyumGSpR0ngBNHdNtmRMuD750C9MxY0m+zQoeUDy c79P+0Q4qrrkLNSElPfx6wkq13KWzZlqp637fydORKzmvkg6L0tAX4N3ByC01hLTmf EuCtmsWq3+8tIxAivlU9yiOCXzlDM5sjm9JaRcn3cSd4fchsp6fQQ1Zw7+fzLatiMX /WFHvavlgwPZQ== Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:52:44 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: winndows@163.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: vfs: Correct the struct name Message-ID: <20210111125244.396e54e5@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1610265599-5101-1-git-send-email-winndows@163.com> References: <1610265599-5101-1-git-send-email-winndows@163.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:59:59 +0800 winndows@163.com wrote: > From: Liao Pingfang > > The struct name should be file_system_type instead of > file_system_operations. > > Signed-off-by: Liao Pingfang > --- > Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst > index ca52c82..18d69a4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ members are defined: > > .. code-block:: c > > - struct file_system_operations { > + struct file_system_type { > const char *name; > int fs_flags; > struct dentry *(*mount) (struct file_system_type *, int, The patch is clearly correct, so I've applied it. There are a number of other ways in which that block is out of date, though. Sure would be nice if somebody could bring it current... Thanks, jon