From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2DDC433E0 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCDB238E7 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726280AbhANFDx (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:03:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725943AbhANFDw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:03:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E528C061794 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:03:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id v3so2301249plz.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:03:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V92Nts5/LO1MQK5AF4Md88e71CzExZyVy0PrsnyGWp0=; b=ZIxkgSKOQxF2SnlRPa6ijaMDFwCzAMhvi1F3o319zniXgVzkIhhfQgrrHJ0pWESuh5 pu+fIo2h9He99+kKwwSaMt9yTh5j9j4MizNabPeRPUONTUAqxB/oUntpS402Q9BUSoRP om6412OmHNrqDBcu7c28PCw8Dq/Z0u2ZNNcbHj+GbJkM9AcPg5oVB+BMHF8d7fsgSQnx 22NWxfglaksP+upjqXHyTtlvAnXn5mkPv1JvKQAkZkC65KSCf5NLtaG60ExjmvkRthpC RwT6WkKEXfwIwrlK9xBgN18XTT5XjKtj/pSzbUb6k0YhGx0a2X6kMvEDckvFyt9Cb7fH fVzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V92Nts5/LO1MQK5AF4Md88e71CzExZyVy0PrsnyGWp0=; b=Nq5P4yrhKtf2Y/34zmLRYMi7/n5BR3ejImvx2KIPwNTZOkehPC1vs9ieg/14kJil46 COR7ZTCqWOe2HQ84r+Q4qIA91yb4dNfCS1Zx7q75zXJqPMPECSogJH8CFDZIgzm1rt+U DuHw5bUG9cy57sdeX3kk4DkOu1yLuVlvcyfMKovaXL/zKRcLWsZ08bLs7U2KtUXhOS5h 5jchPFNgWhzo526SK7UmLFfCz5iJDe3ImYIDrDMsItF4A/3Md9U99uHHlcQDjgEaFvkw DDK/wgOcxV/xM05MNKEHlEZys02VodXhvlnuWsShSiLtVt8k5zMyJdI7WpcPv/Fn+u+H f6tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vE7xMmAYlmPo3i2Ztw1tDRjlIB2TkRwQTsZuzYhoiLTHebuGJ Bj8xCo4arlQADONa1w+GOP8GhA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxX5ENfqzDWGtwN0g0Mu9zNq2fqM69el2/2b6RDTGqJ2Ab91yOr9QgqkUUcG4WPLZzQKWye4w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b587:b029:de:23ed:88b1 with SMTP id a7-20020a170902b587b02900de23ed88b1mr5978581pls.61.1610600592151; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:03:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.172.85.111]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x125sm4083867pgb.35.2021.01.13.21.03.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:03:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:33:09 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rob Herring Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Frank Rowand , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Vincent Guittot , Bill Mills , Anmar Oueja , Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Statically apply overlays using fdtoverlay Message-ID: <20210114050309.wokrhw4o3cjxj5uo@vireshk-i7> References: <1e42183ccafa1afba33b3e79a4e3efd3329fd133.1610095159.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11-01-21, 09:46, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:41 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > Now that fdtoverlay is part of the kernel build, start using it to test > > the unitest overlays we have by applying them statically. > > Nice idea. > > > The file overlay_base.dtb have symbols of its own and we need to apply > > overlay.dtb to overlay_base.dtb alone first to make it work, which gives > > us intermediate-overlay.dtb file. > > Okay? If restructuring things helps we should do that. Frank? Frank, do we want to do something about it ? Maybe make overlay_base.dts an dtsi and include it from testcases.dts like the other ones ? -- viresh