From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4214C433E0 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427B423A50 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:39:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 427B423A50 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l03mf-0004aX-Oq for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:39:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l03lN-0003KE-B2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:38:13 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:25044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l03lL-0006pU-Bw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:38:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610635090; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fjpI+z0La6fvTY0Vi+qftHqaTgYz4deP47Wh1lB9QWE=; b=GJJ9eWa59BGhiw1Smrjb8lkwEmIHeT7EbXmLVu0zHWQ3YqaWVrHssxb81Dbx3kGPljwdCL kcMEgVKPV/sJ1/ho5aVeAvtKaRRKo8QAIgxOQ2SHlpSdqsJ6wfGuNv0cEFvUaJIMGMnQVN FTroevBUDNe/vWesf+sAtSI66ujGiQc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-202-btGVSuYuNHivw0w3c8-Njg-1; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:38:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: btGVSuYuNHivw0w3c8-Njg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14059107ACF7; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lws.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.195.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20712BFEA; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:38:03 +0100 From: Miroslav Rezanina To: Alexander Bulekov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Fix net.c warning on GCC 11 Message-ID: <20210114143803.vow3l6r5nlugz6sc@lws.brq.redhat.com> References: <4fd8d2a3-e665-4422-79e0-4e2a7337e4fc@redhat.com> <20210114141920.qjsnlt3cmkauggtw@mozz.bu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210114141920.qjsnlt3cmkauggtw@mozz.bu.edu> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mrezanin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=mrezanin@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.248, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jason Wang , Dmitry Fleytman , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:19:20AM -0500, Alexander Bulekov wrote: > On 210114 1415, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > +Jason +Dmitry > > > > On 1/14/21 8:07 AM, Miroslav Rezanina wrote: > > > When building qemu with GCC 11, compiling eth.c file produce following warning: > > > > > > warning: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Warray-bounds] > > > > > > This is caused by retyping from ip6_ext_hdr to ip6_ext_hdr_routing that has more > > > attributes. > > > > > > As this usage is expected, suppress the warning temporarily through the function > > > using this retyping. > > > > This is not expected, this is a bug... > > > > Seems related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879531 > -Alex > Yes, it is caused by the issue triggering the warning. Do you know whether the patch mentioned in bug was already sent? Mirek > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina > > > --- > > > net/eth.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/eth.c b/net/eth.c > > > index 1e0821c5f8..b9bdd0435c 100644 > > > --- a/net/eth.c > > > +++ b/net/eth.c > > > @@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr(const struct iovec *pkt, int pkt_frags, > > > struct ip6_ext_hdr *ext_hdr, > > > struct in6_address *dst_addr) > > > { > > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic push > > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds" > > > struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing *rthdr = (struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing *) ext_hdr; > > > > eth_parse_ipv6_hdr() called iov_to_buf() to fill the 2 bytes of ext_hdr. > > > > > if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && > > > > Here we access after the 2 bytes filled... rthdr->rtype is somewhere on > > eth_parse_ipv6_hdr's stack, its content is unknown. > > > > > @@ -426,6 +428,7 @@ _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr(const struct iovec *pkt, int pkt_frags, > > > } > > > > > > return false; > > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop > > > > Nacked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > > > >