From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08914C433DB for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D9923B40 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727290AbhANQTg (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:19:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726253AbhANQTc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:19:32 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD39C0613C1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:18:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:18:50 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1610641131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CU79fA3lQLU/0BgP+JVmOi9jW4RAszez+BU2b1uN+Ec=; b=0VUiS79Kr7Is4ga1h97stZ/TktYHG9GYuiftNyrdufmYVgr836jkryW1o6O/wTWQLd4QHN sa9AUDMaeA2JdwtgZSdHseHwoi8e6VZw6/nu7MsRKagT+McL7f5LfcEZwOz4bJQjF3YIpz P1r7wD4a+CF3Ih1+CzrCkKfFDvpY6KWMMEkAc6SQp7RjS6jdgelUxY7vp+Pys+OkbKIdmq gGDm0o6bNkZ73iTIOtez2jNo6nrRbqvXKXzH/5FETZNTh1A/qZQRlCUBH2vXTVsBNqWGEv b832ICCjrqUJLtWXO3PRQ2adHt32uSYxO9X9tAEUYR+rATzhqXIQ7Oo7mZk1wA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1610641131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CU79fA3lQLU/0BgP+JVmOi9jW4RAszez+BU2b1uN+Ec=; b=6sOM9PYjpHws9X17B3qPBB41OsMNIhLDKK2GdRYI5E/7iZ0xJ/UuHDnfLf6W+lFOhm8AMg ykTOJSe7TktJNsAw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Vitaly Wool Cc: "tiantao (H)" , "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" , Shakeel Butt , Minchan Kim , Mike Galbraith , LKML , linux-mm , NitinGupta , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , "tiantao (H)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: do not use bit_spin_lock Message-ID: <20210114161850.zjcfhsgtmojjjqba@linutronix.de> References: <4490cb6a7e2243fba374e40652979e46@hisilicon.com> <08cbef1e43634c4099709be8e99e5d27@hisilicon.com> <1d0d4a3576e74d128d7849342a7e9faf@hisilicon.com> <4e686c73-b453-e714-021a-1fcd0a565984@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-12-23 19:25:02 [+0100], Vitaly Wool wrote: > > write the following patch according to your idea, what do you think ? > > Yep, that is basically what I was thinking of. Some nitpicks below: Did this go somewhere? The thread just ends here on my end. Mike, is this patch fixing / helping your case in anyway? > Best regards, > Vitaly Sebastian