From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C949C433DB for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500E22C7E for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405150AbhAROwj (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:52:39 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:20440 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393055AbhAROwD (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:52:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610981436; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KNt8I2KtS8LBHMYY1pg2KMY7mTlm0B681NVj2CsqEyI=; b=dNyGh/GQit1y0Yv8p067MJrA02CkN4AfsIRz3NQSZDuGBF4tu97++m8i+WHvjIgLM3U8FE xPU4BAMtkJhvGphE7CUsQ6GEeT09+XcVc/PDhDL1gtsieW34LXR0rBu60BwGifLHrpUi/5 H2mSs/PQiEVWQWIIWEHoqd5A02YGixo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-529-yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:50:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326BB107ACE6; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9E5722C0; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:16 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thomas Huth Cc: Jiaxun Yang , BALATON Zoltan via , Fam Zheng , Laurent Vivier , Viktor Prutyanov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Alistair Francis , Greg Kurz , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Max Reitz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline Message-ID: <20210118145016.GC1799018@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20210118063808.12471-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118063808.12471-10-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118101159.GC1789637@redhat.com> <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many > > > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch. > > > > > > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds > > > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored. > > > > Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error. > > Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try: > > https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330 > > Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also > seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests. The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated from a portability POV rather than ignored. More worrying is the fact that there's a segv in there too when running qemu-img, which does not give me confidence in use of it with musl. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3186C433DB for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5248E22CA0 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5248E22CA0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39326 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1VtA-0003JN-Vn for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:52:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Vrd-0001xq-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:50:41 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Vra-0006Hn-D2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:50:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610981436; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KNt8I2KtS8LBHMYY1pg2KMY7mTlm0B681NVj2CsqEyI=; b=dNyGh/GQit1y0Yv8p067MJrA02CkN4AfsIRz3NQSZDuGBF4tu97++m8i+WHvjIgLM3U8FE xPU4BAMtkJhvGphE7CUsQ6GEeT09+XcVc/PDhDL1gtsieW34LXR0rBu60BwGifLHrpUi/5 H2mSs/PQiEVWQWIIWEHoqd5A02YGixo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-529-yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:50:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326BB107ACE6; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9E5722C0; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:16 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline Message-ID: <20210118145016.GC1799018@redhat.com> References: <20210118063808.12471-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118063808.12471-10-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118101159.GC1789637@redhat.com> <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.175, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Fam Zheng , Laurent Vivier , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Viktor Prutyanov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan via , Greg Kurz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Paolo Bonzini , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many > > > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch. > > > > > > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds > > > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored. > > > > Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error. > > Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try: > > https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330 > > Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also > seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests. The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated from a portability POV rather than ignored. More worrying is the fact that there's a segv in there too when running qemu-img, which does not give me confidence in use of it with musl. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|