From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com
Subject: Re: rcutorture initrd/nolibc build on ARMv8?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:43:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119174358.GB14704@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119171637.GA14704@1wt.eu>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 06:16:37PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > | ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident \
> > | -nostdlib -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h \
> > | -lgcc -s -static -Os -o init init.c
>
> OK I'll retry this, thank you!
For me on my x86 PC it worked using a cross-compiler:
$ /f/tc/gcc-linaro-6.4.1-2018.05-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -nostdlib -include tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h -lgcc -s -static -Os -o init-fail init-fail.c
$ file init-fail
init-fail: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=1088f8fad85b7b8a7f00eef4918d24c4c4fdaadf, stripped
Given that you used a native compiler we can't suspect an issue with a
bare-metal compiler possibly affecting how kernel headers are passed
there. But nevertheless, I'd still not disregard the possibility that
the headers found under "linux/" are picked from the libc which for
whatever reason would be missing a lot of them.
I've now tested natively on a local rpi4b onto which I copied the files
(not enough I/O BW on the SD card to clone a kernel there). Tried:
$ gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -nostdlib -include nolibc.h -lgcc -s -static -Os -o init-fail init-fail.c
specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/7/lto-wrapper
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-7/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-7 --program-prefix=aarch64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-bootstrap --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --enable-multiarch --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
Could you please check the output of this from your intermediary "init.c"
file:
$ gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -nostdlib -include tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h -lgcc -s -static -E init.c | grep '^#'
It might give us a clue about where it's finding its includes. And possibly
the list of __NR_ entries reported here as well:
$ gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -nostdlib -include tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h -lgcc -s -static -E -dM init.c | grep __NR_
We've seen that __NR_fork or __NR_dup2 for example were missing in your
output, on my native machine I can see them, so that could give us a clue
about the root cause of the issue:
$ gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -nostdlib -include nolibc.h -lgcc -s -static -E -dM init-fail.c | egrep '__NR_(fork|dup2)'
#define __NR_dup2 1041
#define __NR_syscalls (__NR_fork+1)
#define __NR_fork 1079
I could easily imagine a missing "linux" link or entry somewhere in the
default includes path, but here since there's no such error it rather looks
like an incorrect file which is a bit more concerning. I purposely avoided
to maintain my own definitions for __NR_* let's hope we won't need to do
that :-/
Thanks,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 15:31 rcutorture initrd/nolibc build on ARMv8? Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-19 16:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-01-19 17:02 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-19 17:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-01-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2021-01-20 12:07 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-20 12:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-01-20 13:45 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-20 14:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-01-20 14:37 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-20 14:54 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-20 15:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-01-21 3:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-02-12 12:37 ` [tip: core/rcu] tools/nolibc: Remove incorrect definitions of __ARCH_WANT_* tip-bot2 for Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210119174358.GB14704@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.