[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences

* [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences
@ 2021-01-19 20:44 Chris Wilson
  2021-01-19 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Apply interactive priority to explicit flip fences (rev3) Patchwork
  2021-01-20  2:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-01-19 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Currently, if a modeset/pageflip needs to wait for render completion to
an object, we boost the priority of that rendering above all other work.
We can apply the same interactive priority boosting to explicit fences
that we can unwrap into a native i915_request (i.e. sync_file).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 16 +++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h   |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c     | 46 ++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 32ff9d201aeb..7373f54b216e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -13527,15 +13527,6 @@ void intel_plane_unpin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state)
 		intel_unpin_fb_vma(vma, old_plane_state->flags);
 }
 
-static void fb_obj_bump_render_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
-{
-	struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
-		.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_DISPLAY),
-	};
-
-	i915_gem_object_wait_priority(obj, 0, &attr);
-}
-
 /**
  * intel_prepare_plane_fb - Prepare fb for usage on plane
  * @_plane: drm plane to prepare for
@@ -13552,6 +13543,9 @@ int
 intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 		       struct drm_plane_state *_new_plane_state)
 {
+	struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
+		.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_DISPLAY),
+	};
 	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(_plane);
 	struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state =
 		to_intel_plane_state(_new_plane_state);
@@ -13591,6 +13585,8 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 	}
 
 	if (new_plane_state->uapi.fence) { /* explicit fencing */
+		i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(new_plane_state->uapi.fence,
+					     &attr);
 		ret = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&state->commit_ready,
 						    new_plane_state->uapi.fence,
 						    i915_fence_timeout(dev_priv),
@@ -13612,7 +13608,7 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	fb_obj_bump_render_priority(obj);
+	i915_gem_object_wait_priority(obj, 0, &attr);
 	i915_gem_object_flush_frontbuffer(obj, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB);
 
 	if (!new_plane_state->uapi.fence) { /* implicit fencing */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index a21714db2e4c..90887b4f5408 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ static inline void __start_cpu_write(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 		obj->cache_dirty = true;
 }
 
+void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr);
+
 int i915_gem_object_wait(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 			 unsigned int flags,
 			 long timeout);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
index c1b13ac50d0f..4b9856d5ba14 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
+#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 
 #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
@@ -44,8 +45,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct dma_resv *resv,
 		unsigned int count, i;
 		int ret;
 
-		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(resv,
-							&excl, &count, &shared);
+		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(resv, &excl, &count, &shared);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct dma_resv *resv,
 	return timeout;
 }
 
-static void __fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
-				 const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+			       const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct i915_request *rq;
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
@@ -103,27 +103,47 @@ static void __fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
 	rq = to_request(fence);
 	engine = rq->engine;
 
-	local_bh_disable();
 	rcu_read_lock(); /* RCU serialisation for set-wedged protection */
 	if (engine->schedule)
 		engine->schedule(rq, attr);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	local_bh_enable(); /* kick the tasklets if queues were reprioritised */
 }
 
-static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
-			       const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
+	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
+}
+
+void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
+				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
+{
+	if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
+		return;
+
+	local_bh_disable();
+
 	/* Recurse once into a fence-array */
 	if (dma_fence_is_array(fence)) {
 		struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence);
 		int i;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
-			__fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
+			fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
+	} else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
+		struct dma_fence *iter;
+
+		/* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */
+		dma_fence_chain_for_each(iter, fence) {
+			fence_set_priority(to_dma_fence_chain(iter)->fence,
+					   attr);
+			break;
+		}
+		dma_fence_put(iter);
 	} else {
-		__fence_set_priority(fence, attr);
+		fence_set_priority(fence, attr);
 	}
+
+	local_bh_enable(); /* kick the tasklets if queues were reprioritised */
 }
 
 int
@@ -139,12 +159,12 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 		int ret;
 
 		ret = dma_resv_get_fences_rcu(obj->base.resv,
-							&excl, &count, &shared);
+					      &excl, &count, &shared);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-			fence_set_priority(shared[i], attr);
+			i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(shared[i], attr);
 			dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
 		}
 
@@ -154,7 +174,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_priority(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	}
 
 	if (excl) {
-		fence_set_priority(excl, attr);
+		i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(excl, attr);
 		dma_fence_put(excl);
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread