All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
@ 2021-01-22  3:03 Like Xu
  2021-01-22  6:42 ` kernel test robot
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Like Xu @ 2021-01-22  3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov, x86, H . Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

Clean up that CONFIG_RETPOLINE crud and replace the
indirect call x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs with static_call().

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c      | 20 --------------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h |  5 -----
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index e37de298a495..cf0a52c80408 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_swap_task_ctx, *x86_pmu.swap_task_ctx);
 DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_drain_pebs,   *x86_pmu.drain_pebs);
 DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_pebs_aliases, *x86_pmu.pebs_aliases);
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs,  *x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs);
+
 u64 __read_mostly hw_cache_event_ids
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
@@ -665,6 +667,12 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+{
+	return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
+
 /*
  * There may be PMI landing after enabled=0. The PMI hitting could be before or
  * after disable_all.
@@ -1923,6 +1931,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_static_call_update(void)
 
 	static_call_update(x86_pmu_drain_pebs, x86_pmu.drain_pebs);
 	static_call_update(x86_pmu_pebs_aliases, x86_pmu.pebs_aliases);
+
+	static_call_update(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs, x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs);
 }
 
 static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -1930,6 +1940,13 @@ static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 	x86_perf_event_update(event);
 }
 
+static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *
+perf_guest_get_msrs_nop(int *nr)
+{
+	*nr = 0;
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
 {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
@@ -2001,6 +2018,9 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
 	if (!x86_pmu.read)
 		x86_pmu.read = _x86_pmu_read;
 
+	if (!x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
+		x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs_nop;
+
 	x86_pmu_static_call_update();
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index d4569bfa83e3..93adf53cce5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3680,26 +3680,6 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
-#endif
-
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
-	if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs == intel_guest_get_msrs)
-		return intel_guest_get_msrs(nr);
-	else if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs == core_guest_get_msrs)
-		return core_guest_get_msrs(nr);
-#endif
-	if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
-		return x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs(nr);
-	*nr = 0;
-	return NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
-
 static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index b9a7fd0a27e2..fac31b4cd61c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -483,11 +483,6 @@ static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
 extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
 extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
 #else
-static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
-{
-	*nr = 0;
-	return NULL;
-}
 static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
 {
 	return -1;
-- 
2.29.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
  2021-01-22  3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs Like Xu
@ 2021-01-22  6:42 ` kernel test robot
  2021-01-22  8:17 ` kernel test robot
  2021-01-25 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-01-22  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1968 bytes --]

Hi Like,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on tip/master v5.11-rc4 next-20210121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Like-Xu/x86-perf-Use-static_call-for-x86_pmu-guest_get_msrs/20210122-112838
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 9a7832ce3d920426a36cdd78eda4b3568d4d09e3
config: i386-randconfig-r033-20210122 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-20) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8e16a2c508abb30462013fd0782d6dd1bf8aa7e2
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Like-Xu/x86-perf-Use-static_call-for-x86_pmu-guest_get_msrs/20210122-112838
        git checkout 8e16a2c508abb30462013fd0782d6dd1bf8aa7e2
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/x86/events/core.c:670:31: warning: no previous prototype for 'perf_guest_get_msrs' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     670 | struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
         |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/perf_guest_get_msrs +670 arch/x86/events/core.c

   669	
 > 670	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
   671	{
   672		return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
   673	}
   674	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
   675	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34944 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
  2021-01-22  3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs Like Xu
  2021-01-22  6:42 ` kernel test robot
@ 2021-01-22  8:17 ` kernel test robot
  2021-01-25 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-01-22  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2565 bytes --]

Hi Like,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on tip/master v5.11-rc4 next-20210121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Like-Xu/x86-perf-Use-static_call-for-x86_pmu-guest_get_msrs/20210122-112838
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 9a7832ce3d920426a36cdd78eda4b3568d4d09e3
config: x86_64-randconfig-a004-20210122 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bd3a387ee76f58caa0d7901f3f84e9bb3d006f27)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8e16a2c508abb30462013fd0782d6dd1bf8aa7e2
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Like-Xu/x86-perf-Use-static_call-for-x86_pmu-guest_get_msrs/20210122-112838
        git checkout 8e16a2c508abb30462013fd0782d6dd1bf8aa7e2
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/x86/events/core.c:670:31: warning: no previous prototype for function 'perf_guest_get_msrs' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
                                 ^
   arch/x86/events/core.c:670:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
   ^
   static 
   1 warning generated.


vim +/perf_guest_get_msrs +670 arch/x86/events/core.c

   669	
 > 670	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
   671	{
   672		return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
   673	}
   674	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
   675	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34048 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
  2021-01-22  3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs Like Xu
  2021-01-22  6:42 ` kernel test robot
  2021-01-22  8:17 ` kernel test robot
@ 2021-01-25 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2021-01-25 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Like Xu
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov, x86, H . Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:03:24AM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> Clean up that CONFIG_RETPOLINE crud and replace the
> indirect call x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs with static_call().
> 

Looks good in principle, but the robot complains about a missing func
decl. I think you removed a little too much when you killed the inline
thing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-26  5:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-22  3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs Like Xu
2021-01-22  6:42 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-22  8:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-25 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.