From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B051C4332E for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242422100A for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388033AbhAZFi2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:38:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49378 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727684AbhAYKxn (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:53:43 -0500 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97CEC22B3F; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l3zS4-009rDe-Mw; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:32 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , David Brazdil , Alexandru Elisei , Ard Biesheuvel , Jing Zhang , Ajay Patil , Prasad Sodagudi , Srinivas Ramana , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v5 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20210125105019.2946057-10-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pajay@qti.qualcomm.com, psodagud@codeaurora.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the "safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user doesn't need to know what they are doing. Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: David Brazdil --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 +++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 9a555809b89c..fe469389068e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct arm64_ftr_bits { s64 safe_val; /* safe value for FTR_EXACT features */ }; +struct arm64_ftr_override { + u64 val; + u64 mask; +}; + /* * @arm64_ftr_reg - Feature register * @strict_mask Bits which should match across all CPUs for sanity. @@ -74,6 +79,7 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg { u64 user_mask; u64 sys_val; u64 user_val; + struct arm64_ftr_override *override; const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftr_bits; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index e99eddec0a46..cb58c7c991ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -352,9 +352,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; +static struct arm64_ftr_override no_override = { }; + struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = { .name = "SYS_CTR_EL0", - .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr + .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr, + .override = &no_override, }; static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = { @@ -544,13 +547,16 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; -#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) { \ - .sys_id = id, \ - .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ - .name = #id, \ - .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ +#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, ovr) { \ + .sys_id = id, \ + .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ + .name = #id, \ + .override = (ovr), \ + .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ }} +#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, &no_override) + static const struct __ftr_reg_entry { u32 sys_id; struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg; @@ -770,6 +776,30 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) { u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp); s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new); + s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->override->val); + + if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->mask) == ftr_mask) { + s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new); + char *str = NULL; + + if (ftr_ovr != tmp) { + /* Unsafe, remove the override */ + reg->override->mask &= ~ftr_mask; + reg->override->val &= ~ftr_mask; + tmp = ftr_ovr; + str = "ignoring override"; + } else if (ftr_new != tmp) { + /* Override was valid */ + ftr_new = tmp; + str = "forced"; + } + + if (str) + pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n", + reg->name, + ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1, + ftrp->shift, str, tmp); + } val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new); -- 2.29.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79417C433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28A222D50 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F28A222D50 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD054B5D8; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RaJu7g+SF526; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2562B4B606; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC444B5E1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:41 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-ov8bhjT9ye for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA6C4B607 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:50:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97CEC22B3F; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l3zS4-009rDe-Mw; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:32 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20210125105019.2946057-10-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pajay@qti.qualcomm.com, psodagud@codeaurora.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Prasad Sodagudi , Srinivas Ramana , Catalin Marinas , Ajay Patil , kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the "safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user doesn't need to know what they are doing. Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: David Brazdil --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 +++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 9a555809b89c..fe469389068e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct arm64_ftr_bits { s64 safe_val; /* safe value for FTR_EXACT features */ }; +struct arm64_ftr_override { + u64 val; + u64 mask; +}; + /* * @arm64_ftr_reg - Feature register * @strict_mask Bits which should match across all CPUs for sanity. @@ -74,6 +79,7 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg { u64 user_mask; u64 sys_val; u64 user_val; + struct arm64_ftr_override *override; const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftr_bits; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index e99eddec0a46..cb58c7c991ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -352,9 +352,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; +static struct arm64_ftr_override no_override = { }; + struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = { .name = "SYS_CTR_EL0", - .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr + .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr, + .override = &no_override, }; static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = { @@ -544,13 +547,16 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; -#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) { \ - .sys_id = id, \ - .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ - .name = #id, \ - .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ +#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, ovr) { \ + .sys_id = id, \ + .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ + .name = #id, \ + .override = (ovr), \ + .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ }} +#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, &no_override) + static const struct __ftr_reg_entry { u32 sys_id; struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg; @@ -770,6 +776,30 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) { u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp); s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new); + s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->override->val); + + if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->mask) == ftr_mask) { + s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new); + char *str = NULL; + + if (ftr_ovr != tmp) { + /* Unsafe, remove the override */ + reg->override->mask &= ~ftr_mask; + reg->override->val &= ~ftr_mask; + tmp = ftr_ovr; + str = "ignoring override"; + } else if (ftr_new != tmp) { + /* Override was valid */ + ftr_new = tmp; + str = "forced"; + } + + if (str) + pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n", + reg->name, + ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1, + ftrp->shift, str, tmp); + } val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new); -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CF8C433E6 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808D322D04 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:53:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 808D322D04 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=knyahs8+hpbV0Mjx3nWdGs9RDtA3Gy/bIcQG/prevgw=; b=MCRTBN6BxZ7M6Z71+hWl6MZnz lPyJfVxnACdyxjGg0fbY6Bg4qlXrh2dVALdJDPl3QWXLd7NQb1Fj3K13y7E7A0ZDM4Mutl5NBMgQA KEsWvSWE5jQ3PhjebgAzNnqOrSr7g9sVDejNY84BNSvxaU41RYMaBqYYa1AQMGKTGOCqzmtecDrYd 6GnyAsoHzhW8GBVzpUnwuN5lwlKDhKZBV83x4oZ17Za2caq82GfB+vjMoLhubwOiCjEJXWpDfTMj0 +NbspBI3p9lo9qera9SawDcoSPalL2m14E5fBaAHaYgBiflAhwolhwcHXxZImtL/3alv/30/jbnoi 6mf+MThEA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l3zSu-0000i7-R3; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:51:24 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l3zS7-0000UJ-DX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:38 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97CEC22B3F; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l3zS4-009rDe-Mw; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:32 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:50:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20210125105019.2946057-10-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pajay@qti.qualcomm.com, psodagud@codeaurora.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210125_055035_628960_524AF1FF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Jing Zhang , Prasad Sodagudi , Srinivas Ramana , Suzuki K Poulose , Catalin Marinas , Alexandru Elisei , James Morse , Ajay Patil , kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Julien Thierry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the "safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user doesn't need to know what they are doing. Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: David Brazdil --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 +++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 9a555809b89c..fe469389068e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct arm64_ftr_bits { s64 safe_val; /* safe value for FTR_EXACT features */ }; +struct arm64_ftr_override { + u64 val; + u64 mask; +}; + /* * @arm64_ftr_reg - Feature register * @strict_mask Bits which should match across all CPUs for sanity. @@ -74,6 +79,7 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg { u64 user_mask; u64 sys_val; u64 user_val; + struct arm64_ftr_override *override; const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftr_bits; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index e99eddec0a46..cb58c7c991ef 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -352,9 +352,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; +static struct arm64_ftr_override no_override = { }; + struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = { .name = "SYS_CTR_EL0", - .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr + .ftr_bits = ftr_ctr, + .override = &no_override, }; static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = { @@ -544,13 +547,16 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = { ARM64_FTR_END, }; -#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) { \ - .sys_id = id, \ - .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ - .name = #id, \ - .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ +#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, ovr) { \ + .sys_id = id, \ + .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \ + .name = #id, \ + .override = (ovr), \ + .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \ }} +#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, &no_override) + static const struct __ftr_reg_entry { u32 sys_id; struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg; @@ -770,6 +776,30 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) { u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp); s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new); + s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->override->val); + + if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->mask) == ftr_mask) { + s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new); + char *str = NULL; + + if (ftr_ovr != tmp) { + /* Unsafe, remove the override */ + reg->override->mask &= ~ftr_mask; + reg->override->val &= ~ftr_mask; + tmp = ftr_ovr; + str = "ignoring override"; + } else if (ftr_new != tmp) { + /* Override was valid */ + ftr_new = tmp; + str = "forced"; + } + + if (str) + pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n", + reg->name, + ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1, + ftrp->shift, str, tmp); + } val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new); -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel