From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE647C433DB for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50031206A1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728829AbhAYN2F (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:28:05 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52268 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728773AbhAYNXe (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:23:34 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1611580960; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HBPiTlyjs/rd83M2ASR6VRAaO1aAU7kqtIEB/emLiF8=; b=SM0/VTZMBNHqgVSuRgzW1bNKEyfnhksCGuH4r2StqhGzYxnWNABch2SuUX6p+L2X1mDXnL aNXKT/QdbIrBpwYw9o+SWb7pZ9R6JZ86HkWsozspmX79BC3T7osgRXNEyN0Fw6ynjFK8jy U9LfjEsj/V/we54F6DHsz/7/ykpPgMU= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9CAC45; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:22:36 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" Cc: LKML , RCU , "Paul E . McKenney" , Michael Ellerman , Andrew Morton , Daniel Axtens , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvfree_rcu: Allocate a page for a single argument Message-ID: <20210125132236.GJ827@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20210120162148.1973-1-urezki@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210120162148.1973-1-urezki@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 20-01-21 17:21:46, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > For a single argument we can directly request a page from a caller > context when a "carry page block" is run out of free spots. Instead > of hitting a slow path we can request an extra page by demand and > proceed with a fast path. > > A single-argument kvfree_rcu() must be invoked in sleepable contexts, > and that its fallback is the relatively high latency synchronize_rcu(). > Single-argument kvfree_rcu() therefore uses GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL > to allow limited sleeping within the memory allocator. __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL can be quite heavy. It is effectively the most heavy way to allocate without triggering the OOM killer. Is this really what you need/want? Is __GFP_NORETRY too weak? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs