All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: verify that rebinding to port < 1024 from BPF works
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:35:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126193544.1548503-2-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126193544.1548503-1-sdf@google.com>

Return 3 to indicate that permission check for port 111
should be skipped.

Cc: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c      | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind_perm.c |  45 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind_perm.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d0f06e40c16d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bind_perm.skel.h"
+
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <sys/capability.h>
+
+static int duration;
+
+void try_bind(int family, int port, int expected_errno)
+{
+	struct sockaddr_storage addr = {};
+	struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6;
+	struct sockaddr_in *sin;
+	int fd = -1;
+
+	fd = socket(family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "fd", "errno %d", errno))
+		goto close_socket;
+
+	if (family == AF_INET) {
+		sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&addr;
+		sin->sin_family = family;
+		sin->sin_port = htons(port);
+	} else {
+		sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&addr;
+		sin6->sin6_family = family;
+		sin6->sin6_port = htons(port);
+	}
+
+	errno = 0;
+	bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, expected_errno, "bind");
+
+close_socket:
+	if (fd >= 0)
+		close(fd);
+}
+
+bool cap_net_bind_service(cap_flag_value_t flag)
+{
+	const cap_value_t cap_net_bind_service = CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE;
+	cap_flag_value_t original_value;
+	bool was_effective = false;
+	cap_t caps;
+
+	caps = cap_get_proc();
+	if (CHECK(!caps, "cap_get_proc", "errno %d", errno))
+		goto free_caps;
+
+	if (CHECK(cap_get_flag(caps, CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE, CAP_EFFECTIVE,
+			       &original_value),
+		  "cap_get_flag", "errno %d", errno))
+		goto free_caps;
+
+	was_effective = (original_value == CAP_SET);
+
+	if (CHECK(cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, &cap_net_bind_service,
+			       flag),
+		  "cap_set_flag", "errno %d", errno))
+		goto free_caps;
+
+	if (CHECK(cap_set_proc(caps), "cap_set_proc", "errno %d", errno))
+		goto free_caps;
+
+free_caps:
+	CHECK(cap_free(caps), "cap_free", "errno %d", errno);
+	return was_effective;
+}
+
+void test_bind_perm(void)
+{
+	bool cap_was_effective;
+	struct bind_perm *skel;
+	int cgroup_fd;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/bind_perm");
+	if (CHECK(cgroup_fd < 0, "cg-join", "errno %d", errno))
+		return;
+
+	skel = bind_perm__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
+		goto close_cgroup_fd;
+
+	skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bind_v4_prog"))
+		goto close_skeleton;
+
+	skel->links.bind_v6_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v6_prog, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bind_v6_prog"))
+		goto close_skeleton;
+
+	cap_was_effective = cap_net_bind_service(CAP_CLEAR);
+
+	try_bind(AF_INET, 110, EACCES);
+	try_bind(AF_INET6, 110, EACCES);
+
+	try_bind(AF_INET, 111, 0);
+	try_bind(AF_INET6, 111, 0);
+
+	if (cap_was_effective)
+		cap_net_bind_service(CAP_SET);
+
+close_skeleton:
+	bind_perm__destroy(skel);
+close_cgroup_fd:
+	close(cgroup_fd);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind_perm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind_perm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7bd2a027025d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind_perm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/stddef.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+
+static __always_inline int bind_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx, int family)
+{
+	struct bpf_sock *sk;
+
+	sk = ctx->sk;
+	if (!sk)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (sk->family != family)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (ctx->type != SOCK_STREAM)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Return 1 OR'ed with the first bit set to indicate
+	 * that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE should be bypassed.
+	 */
+	if (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(111))
+		return (1 | 2);
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+int bind_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return bind_prog(ctx, AF_INET);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+int bind_v6_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return bind_prog(ctx, AF_INET6);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.30.0.280.ga3ce27912f-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-26 19:35 [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: allow rewriting to ports under ip_unprivileged_port_start Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-26 19:35 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2021-01-26 20:47   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: verify that rebinding to port < 1024 from BPF works Martin KaFai Lau
2021-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: allow rewriting to ports under ip_unprivileged_port_start Martin KaFai Lau
2021-01-27 18:24 ` Andrey Ignatov
2021-01-27 18:28   ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210126193544.1548503-2-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdna@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.