[PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT

[PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT

[Cao jin]

struct setup_data.len is the length of data field. In case of
SETUP_INDIRECT, it should be sizeof(setup_indirect).

Signed-off-by: Cao jin <jojing64@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
index abb9fc164657..fc844913dece 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ Protocol:	2.09+
     struct setup_data {
       __u64 next = 0 or <addr_of_next_setup_data_struct>;
       __u32 type = SETUP_INDIRECT;
-      __u32 len = sizeof(setup_data);
+      __u32 len = sizeof(setup_indirect);
       __u8 data[sizeof(setup_indirect)] = struct setup_indirect {
         __u32 type = SETUP_INDIRECT | SETUP_E820_EXT;
         __u32 reserved = 0;
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT

[Daniel Kiper]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> struct setup_data.len is the length of data field. In case of
> SETUP_INDIRECT, it should be sizeof(setup_indirect).
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <jojing64@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>

Daniel

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:40 +0100
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> > struct setup_data.len is the length of data field. In case of
> > SETUP_INDIRECT, it should be sizeof(setup_indirect).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cao jin <jojing64@gmail.com>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>

Applied, thanks.

jon