From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13391C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 23:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE74064DFD for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 23:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231211AbhA1Xzd (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:55:33 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:51954 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229757AbhA1Xz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:55:29 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C130D2B8; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 23:54:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net C130D2B8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1611878089; bh=YdD+k8vJN24eZfQuSsHdwnb9+XXDsBI/7xyammat07o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J4c4WhtX4sz2gyAotY2Iyml6l/BKOQGzF6VJm9hPhTO6Ocf5YpZ4MP7DO8byYRN99 ULQg7ab5mgIAIO5X3UzpIq7wsHzWWF0ayoOEg/0z0XWSMGrDszNrCTgbi/orvIKFGa rTJir9ItNpCMhUXsqCpnMo3j2EtokSJm6Vs98QwuLXXjapjskVejUCITy+UaRUDCJO TIAtO42LRdaLAYihax4w1r9/ptzYEvpX00AxtINSr+v6jMxXhb8d7iokY3NMQ5ydHD lD4mxhAxcj9w0WjF3o6NA82hrj19eXG5Znc2VnCkKyx1oAzCKUD3qdbqsOd8R0axKO 8BpVxNu+em3bA== Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:54:47 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: devel@lists.elisa.tech, Ralf Ramsauer , Wolfgang Mauerer , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pia Eichinger , =?UTF-8?B?QmHFn2Fr?= Erdamar Subject: Re: Small student project idea on appropriate integration trees in MAINTAINERS Message-ID: <20210128165447.3da0d98e@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:22:24 +0100 Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > In this project, we can make use of: > > - gitdm [git://git.lwn.net/gitdm.git]: gitdm includes some scripts to > parse MAINTAINERS and obtain the integration tree patch of a commit. Look also at the 'treeplot' tool there, which determines which tree(s) each patch went through and makes pretty (OK, not hugely pretty) pictures from the result. I suspect you'll find that the tree information is mostly correct. Developers need to know that to be able to base their patches properly; an incorrect entry would lead to a certain amount of maintainer misery. Thanks, jon