* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review [not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org> @ 2021-01-29 18:22 ` Naresh Kamboju 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter 2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz> 2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-01-29 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.10.12-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06 git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11) Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -------------- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites ----------- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest * network-basic-tests * perf * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * kvm-unit-tests * fwts * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review 2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:52:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> Thanks for testing these and letting me know. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review 2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2021-01-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. >> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. Replying here because I don't have the original. Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 65 tests: 65 pass, 0 fail Linux version: 5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Jon -- nvpublic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review [not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org> 2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-01-29 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review 2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck @ 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:23:16AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Thanks for testing them all and letting me know. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>]
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz> @ 2021-01-30 13:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, stable On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2021-01-29 12:07:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > CIP testing did not find any problems here: > > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y > > Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Thanks for testing these and letting me know. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-30 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
2021-01-30 13:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.