From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:04:31 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 0/1] package/sysklogd: proposal to update default syslog.conf In-Reply-To: <87sg6gg1d9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20210130135203.159451-1-troglobit@gmail.com> <20210131231346.6bce24e3@windsurf.home> <87sg6gg1d9.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20210201090431.48d3508e@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:58:26 +0100 Joachim Wiberg wrote: > True, no point in having a local copy. > > My main question was if there was any specific reason to sticking with > the old habits of only using /var/log/messages, as BusyBox syslogd does, > or if every logging package is free to have its own defalts? Within > reason, of course. I'm just a bit concerned with breaking peoples > defaults, even though they can just provide their own. > > If it's OK to change for sysklogd, I can post a new patch that drops > the locallay maintained .conf and instead installs the sysklogd one. I don't have a strong opinion on what should be our default configuration for sysklogd. Peter, do you have any comments ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com