From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux X25 <linux-x25@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lapb: Copy the skb before sending a packet
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:42:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201204224.4872ce23@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJht_EOw4d9h7LqOsXpucADV5=gAGws-fKj5q7BdH2+h0Yv9Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:14:31 -0800 Xie He wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:10 AM Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This sounds a bit like you want skb_cow_head() ... ?
>
> Calling "skb_cow_head" before we call "skb_clone" would indeed solve
> the problem of writes to our clones affecting clones in other parts of
> the system. But since we are still writing to the skb after
> "skb_clone", it'd still be better to replace "skb_clone" with
> "skb_copy" to avoid interference between our own clones.
Why call skb_cow_head() before skb_clone()? skb_cow_head should be
called before the data in skb head is modified. I'm assuming you're only
modifying "front" of the frame, right? skb_cow_head() should do nicely
in that case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 5:57 [PATCH net] net: lapb: Copy the skb before sending a packet Xie He
2021-02-01 10:05 ` Martin Schiller
2021-02-01 10:49 ` Xie He
2021-02-01 12:47 ` Martin Schiller
2021-02-01 14:10 ` Julian Wiedmann
2021-02-01 16:14 ` Xie He
2021-02-02 4:42 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-02-02 6:25 ` Xie He
2021-02-02 16:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-02 9:04 ` David Laight
2021-02-02 16:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210201204224.4872ce23@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.