All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	"Chris Browy" <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"John Groves (jgroves)" <jgroves@micron.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 16/31] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 16:59:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210202005948.241655-17-ben.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202005948.241655-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

Currently, QEMU makes _UID equivalent to the bus number (_BBN). While
there is nothing wrong with doing it this way, CXL spec has a heavy
reliance on _UID to identify host bridges and there is no link to the
bus number. Having a distinct UID solves two problems. The first is it
gets us around the limitation of 256 (current max bus number). The
second is it allows us to replicate hardware configurations where bus
number and uid aren't equivalent. The latter has benefits for our
development and debugging using QEMU.

The other way to do this would be to implement the expanded bus
numbering, but having an explicit uid makes more sense when trying to
replicate real hardware configurations.

The QEMU commandline to utilize this would be:
  -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus="pcie.0",bus_nr=1,uid=x

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

--

I'm guessing this patch will be somewhat controversial. For early CXL
work, this can be dropped without too much heartache.
---
 hw/i386/acpi-build.c                |  3 ++-
 hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 hw/pci/pci.c                        | 11 +++++++++++
 include/hw/pci/pci.h                |  1 +
 include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h            |  1 +
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index cf6eb54c22..145a503e92 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
         QLIST_FOREACH(bus, &bus->child, sibling) {
             uint8_t bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
             uint8_t numa_node = pci_bus_numa_node(bus);
+            int32_t uid = pci_bus_uid(bus);
 
             /* look only for expander root buses */
             if (!pci_bus_is_root(bus)) {
@@ -1356,7 +1357,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
             scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
             dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
             aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(bus_num)));
-            init_pci_acpi(dev, bus_num, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : PCI);
+            init_pci_acpi(dev, uid, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : PCI);
 
             if (numa_node != NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED) {
                 aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_PXM", aml_int(numa_node)));
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
index b42592e1ff..5021b60435 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct PXBDev {
 
     uint8_t bus_nr;
     uint16_t numa_node;
+    int32_t uid;
 };
 
 static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
@@ -98,12 +99,20 @@ static uint16_t pxb_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return pxb->numa_node;
 }
 
+static int32_t pxb_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(bus->parent_dev);
+
+    return pxb->uid;
+}
+
 static void pxb_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
 {
     PCIBusClass *pbc = PCI_BUS_CLASS(class);
 
     pbc->bus_num = pxb_bus_num;
     pbc->numa_node = pxb_bus_numa_node;
+    pbc->uid = pxb_bus_uid;
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo pxb_bus_info = {
@@ -329,6 +338,7 @@ static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
     /* Note: 0 is not a legal PXB bus number. */
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
+    DEFINE_PROP_INT32("uid", PXBDev, uid, -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
@@ -400,12 +410,21 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_dev_info = {
 
 static void pxb_cxl_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
 {
+    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(dev);
+
     /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is still PCIe */
     if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
         error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices cannot reside on a PCI bus");
         return;
     }
 
+    if (pxb->uid < 0) {
+        error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices must have a valid uid (0-2147483647)");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    /* FIXME: Check that uid doesn't collide with UIDs of other host bridges */
+
     pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, CXL, errp);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index adbe8aa260..bf019d91a0 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -170,6 +170,11 @@ static uint16_t pcibus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED;
 }
 
+static int32_t pcibus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    return -1;
+}
+
 static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
 {
     BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(klass);
@@ -184,6 +189,7 @@ static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
 
     pbc->bus_num = pcibus_num;
     pbc->numa_node = pcibus_numa_node;
+    pbc->uid = pcibus_uid;
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo pci_bus_info = {
@@ -530,6 +536,11 @@ int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->numa_node(bus);
 }
 
+int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->uid(bus);
+}
+
 static int get_pci_config_device(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size,
                                  const VMStateField *field)
 {
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
index bde3697bee..a46de48ccd 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static inline int pci_dev_bus_num(const PCIDevice *dev)
 }
 
 int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus);
+int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus);
 void pci_for_each_device(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num,
                          void (*fn)(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *d, void *opaque),
                          void *opaque);
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
index eb94e7e85c..3c9fbc55bb 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct PCIBusClass {
 
     int (*bus_num)(PCIBus *bus);
     uint16_t (*numa_node)(PCIBus *bus);
+    int32_t (*uid)(PCIBus *bus);
 };
 
 enum PCIBusFlags {
-- 
2.30.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"John Groves (jgroves)" <jgroves@micron.com>,
	"Chris Browy" <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 16/31] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 16:59:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210202005948.241655-17-ben.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202005948.241655-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

Currently, QEMU makes _UID equivalent to the bus number (_BBN). While
there is nothing wrong with doing it this way, CXL spec has a heavy
reliance on _UID to identify host bridges and there is no link to the
bus number. Having a distinct UID solves two problems. The first is it
gets us around the limitation of 256 (current max bus number). The
second is it allows us to replicate hardware configurations where bus
number and uid aren't equivalent. The latter has benefits for our
development and debugging using QEMU.

The other way to do this would be to implement the expanded bus
numbering, but having an explicit uid makes more sense when trying to
replicate real hardware configurations.

The QEMU commandline to utilize this would be:
  -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus="pcie.0",bus_nr=1,uid=x

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

--

I'm guessing this patch will be somewhat controversial. For early CXL
work, this can be dropped without too much heartache.
---
 hw/i386/acpi-build.c                |  3 ++-
 hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 hw/pci/pci.c                        | 11 +++++++++++
 include/hw/pci/pci.h                |  1 +
 include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h            |  1 +
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index cf6eb54c22..145a503e92 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
         QLIST_FOREACH(bus, &bus->child, sibling) {
             uint8_t bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
             uint8_t numa_node = pci_bus_numa_node(bus);
+            int32_t uid = pci_bus_uid(bus);
 
             /* look only for expander root buses */
             if (!pci_bus_is_root(bus)) {
@@ -1356,7 +1357,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
             scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
             dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
             aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(bus_num)));
-            init_pci_acpi(dev, bus_num, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : PCI);
+            init_pci_acpi(dev, uid, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : PCI);
 
             if (numa_node != NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED) {
                 aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_PXM", aml_int(numa_node)));
diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
index b42592e1ff..5021b60435 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct PXBDev {
 
     uint8_t bus_nr;
     uint16_t numa_node;
+    int32_t uid;
 };
 
 static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
@@ -98,12 +99,20 @@ static uint16_t pxb_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return pxb->numa_node;
 }
 
+static int32_t pxb_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(bus->parent_dev);
+
+    return pxb->uid;
+}
+
 static void pxb_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
 {
     PCIBusClass *pbc = PCI_BUS_CLASS(class);
 
     pbc->bus_num = pxb_bus_num;
     pbc->numa_node = pxb_bus_numa_node;
+    pbc->uid = pxb_bus_uid;
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo pxb_bus_info = {
@@ -329,6 +338,7 @@ static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
     /* Note: 0 is not a legal PXB bus number. */
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
+    DEFINE_PROP_INT32("uid", PXBDev, uid, -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
@@ -400,12 +410,21 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_dev_info = {
 
 static void pxb_cxl_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
 {
+    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(dev);
+
     /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is still PCIe */
     if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
         error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices cannot reside on a PCI bus");
         return;
     }
 
+    if (pxb->uid < 0) {
+        error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices must have a valid uid (0-2147483647)");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    /* FIXME: Check that uid doesn't collide with UIDs of other host bridges */
+
     pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, CXL, errp);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index adbe8aa260..bf019d91a0 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -170,6 +170,11 @@ static uint16_t pcibus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED;
 }
 
+static int32_t pcibus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    return -1;
+}
+
 static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
 {
     BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(klass);
@@ -184,6 +189,7 @@ static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
 
     pbc->bus_num = pcibus_num;
     pbc->numa_node = pcibus_numa_node;
+    pbc->uid = pcibus_uid;
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo pci_bus_info = {
@@ -530,6 +536,11 @@ int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
     return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->numa_node(bus);
 }
 
+int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
+{
+    return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->uid(bus);
+}
+
 static int get_pci_config_device(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size,
                                  const VMStateField *field)
 {
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
index bde3697bee..a46de48ccd 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static inline int pci_dev_bus_num(const PCIDevice *dev)
 }
 
 int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus);
+int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus);
 void pci_for_each_device(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num,
                          void (*fn)(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *d, void *opaque),
                          void *opaque);
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
index eb94e7e85c..3c9fbc55bb 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct PCIBusClass {
 
     int (*bus_num)(PCIBus *bus);
     uint16_t (*numa_node)(PCIBus *bus);
+    int32_t (*uid)(PCIBus *bus);
 };
 
 enum PCIBusFlags {
-- 
2.30.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  0:59 [RFC PATCH v3 00/31] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/31] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/31] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 11:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 11:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-17 18:36     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-11 17:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 17:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-17 16:40     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/31] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 12:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 12:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 12:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-17 22:15     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 14:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 14:58     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 17:46     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-18  0:55       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-18 16:50         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 18:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 18:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/31] hw/cxl/device: Add memory device utilities Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/31] hw/cxl/device: Add cheap EVENTS implementation (8.2.9.1) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 13:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 13:44     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 17:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/31] hw/cxl/device: Timestamp implementation (8.2.9.3) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/31] hw/cxl/device: Add log commands (8.2.9.4) + CEL Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/31] hw/pxb: Use a type for realizing expanders Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 13:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 13:50     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/31] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/31] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/31] qtest: allow DSDT acpi table changes Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/31] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 13:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 13:56     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-12-02 10:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-12-02 10:32     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/31] tests/acpi: remove stale allowed tables Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2021-02-02  0:59   ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/31] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 15:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 15:00     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 15:24     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-02 15:24       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-02 15:42       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 15:42         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 15:51         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-02 15:51           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-02 16:20           ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 16:20             ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/31] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 19:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 19:21     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 19:45     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 20:43       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02 21:03         ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 22:06           ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/31] acpi/pxb/cxl: Reserve host bridge MMIO Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/31] hw/pxb/cxl: Add "windows" for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/31] hw/cxl/rp: Add a root port Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/31] hw/cxl/device: Add a memory device (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 14:26   ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 15:06     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02 15:06       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement MMIO HDM decoding (8.2.5.12) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/31] acpi/cxl: Add _OSC implementation (9.14.2) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/31] tests/acpi: allow CEDT table addition Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 25/31] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1) Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 26/31] tests/acpi: Add new CEDT files Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 27/31] hw/cxl/device: Add some trivial commands Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 28/31] hw/cxl/device: Plumb real LSA sizing Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 29/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement get/set LSA Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 30/31] qtest/cxl: Add very basic sanity tests Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 31/31] WIP: i386/cxl: Initialize a host bridge Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  0:59   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-02  1:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/31] CXL 2.0 Support no-reply
2021-02-02  1:33   ` no-reply
2021-02-03 17:42 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-02-11 18:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-11 18:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-11 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Go back to subregions Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210202005948.241655-17-ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --to=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgroves@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.