On 2021.01.21 13:33:18 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:38:34 +0800
> Fred Gao <fred.gao@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Before opregion version 2.0 VBT data is stored in opregion mailbox #4,
> > However, When VBT data exceeds 6KB size and cannot be within mailbox #4
> > starting from opregion v2.0+, Extended VBT region, next to opregion, is
> > used to hold the VBT data, so the total size will be opregion size plus
> > extended VBT region size.
> > 
> > Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Swee Yee Fonn <swee.yee.fonn@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fred Gao <fred.gao@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_igd.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_igd.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_igd.c
> > index 53d97f459252..fc470278a492 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_igd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_igd.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@
> >  #define OPREGION_SIZE		(8 * 1024)
> >  #define OPREGION_PCI_ADDR	0xfc
> >  
> > +#define OPREGION_RVDA		0x3ba
> > +#define OPREGION_RVDS		0x3c2
> > +#define OPREGION_VERSION	0x16
> > +
> >  static size_t vfio_pci_igd_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> >  			      size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite)
> >  {
> > @@ -58,6 +62,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_igd_opregion_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> >  	u32 addr, size;
> >  	void *base;
> >  	int ret;
> > +	u16 version;
> >  
> >  	ret = pci_read_config_dword(vdev->pdev, OPREGION_PCI_ADDR, &addr);
> >  	if (ret)
> > @@ -83,6 +88,60 @@ static int vfio_pci_igd_opregion_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> >  
> >  	size *= 1024; /* In KB */
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Support opregion v2.0+
> > +	 * When VBT data exceeds 6KB size and cannot be within mailbox #4
> > +	 * Extended VBT region, next to opregion, is used to hold the VBT data.
> > +	 * RVDA (Relative Address of VBT Data from Opregion Base) and RVDS
> > +	 * (VBT Data Size) from opregion structure member are used to hold the
> > +	 * address from region base and size of VBT data while RVDA/RVDS
> > +	 * are not defined before opregion 2.0.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * opregion 2.0: rvda is the physical VBT address.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * opregion 2.1+: rvda is unsigned, relative offset from
> > +	 * opregion base, and should never point within opregion.
> > +	 */
> > +	version = le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)(base + OPREGION_VERSION));
> > +	if (version >= 0x0200) {
> > +		u64 rvda;
> > +		u32 rvds;
> > +
> > +		rvda = le64_to_cpu(*(__le64 *)(base + OPREGION_RVDA));
> > +		rvds = le32_to_cpu(*(__le32 *)(base + OPREGION_RVDS));
> > +		if (rvda && rvds) {
> > +			u32 offset;
> > +
> > +			if (version == 0x0200)
> > +				offset = rvda - (u64)addr;
> > +			else
> > +				offset = rvda;
> > +
> > +			if (offset != size) {
> > +				pci_err(vdev->pdev,
> > +				"Extended VBT does not follow opregion !\n"
> > +				"opregion version 0x%x:offset 0x%x\n", version, offset);
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			/*
> > +			 * the only difference between opregion 2.0 and 2.1 is
> > +			 * rvda addressing mode. since rvda is physical host
> > +			 * VBT address and cannot be directly used in guest,
> > +			 * faked into opregion 2.1's relative offset.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (version == 0x0200) {
> > +				*(__le16 *)(base + OPREGION_VERSION) =
> > +					cpu_to_le16(0x0201);
> > +				(*(__le64 *)(base + OPREGION_RVDA)) =
> > +					cpu_to_le64((rvda - (u64)addr));
> > +			}
> 
> There's a much better description of the fields and logic here, thanks
> for that.  I also see we've closed the gap to require the extended
> region to immediately follow the opregion table.  The code
> immediately above still makes me nervous as even if this is the only
> difference between the specs, code might make some differentiation
> based on the spec version, which we're changing in host memory for all
> subsequent drivers until the host is rebooted.  Could we use a pci_dbg()
> in this branch to flag that event in dmesg for debugging?  Thanks,
> 

Alex, that's really valid concern, even we thought it should be no problem,
we asked firmware team again, it looks for opregion 2.0 with VBT >6k case (RVDA != 0)
is not practically available for end user. So I think we may just not support
for that. For opregion 2.1+, just extend the size properly.

Thanks

> 
> > +
> > +			/* region size for opregion v2.0+: opregion and VBT size */
> > +			size = offset + rvds;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (size != OPREGION_SIZE) {
> >  		memunmap(base);
> >  		base = memremap(addr, size, MEMREMAP_WB);
>