From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD42C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D459364E40 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232759AbhBBPWl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:22:41 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:12978 "EHLO hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234816AbhBBPWB (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:22:01 -0500 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:21:16 -0800 Received: from HKMAIL104.nvidia.com (10.18.16.13) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:16 +0000 Received: from HKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.18.16.10) by HKMAIL104.nvidia.com (10.18.16.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:14 +0000 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.109) by HKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.18.16.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:13 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Imr8l03ETBN/x4qPi2fl+uO0CIOMt/e6n8Myt5wscrAWs3sDf8/whEJ+/ROifIQ3oiYmuJEaecUNwfiBG1EH6lGoOEkK7QNh+dxARxjjBrjdSGbqknu+1HIT68gO1MC779ilpCptm7Kg/RFxYArAgTVyxtYVMhG+cu/OhEckEMu/3oQOQwlHkLnpYFEkzZ3Ypr0k6B+aHbb6eyM/X68xAi9h9a6nYlQef0iXB+2T+r1DeXNIuXH7XC9glzmRVQRutzdK4ammIGMPpkZsugdAbs6YClzO5YP6tc3pTqA5Q9VpPlH3PWdrhXb+CG/ZMPsa/ucUKiIhwDTRYYJzNqCmMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Et2Gr31MBoQ7d2Nf3+cdQcXOU+/1zCpWMIdjhCH3LwA=; b=TSwz3AxVBSYEVUjuTXmLpiqphM/wv+bV8H/Oou7lbVBGXhTpl1hmH0D+ZRRpelC7lxexR3jOAQf5T/jd7Wej4ODFHcxfN4ifp7zw0DtNGhy1xe0n1I3hOcnQTzeXGMVX6cuI5AkBMnB8JW4DNEYopUQ2WMyxGP38vP7mlq0usTIQkfW+sbCPzi+w+tzVwPlXj3rhEkzjskotjHtq1nLXRXw9mQbogj1w6mI4HqCdlv1pRk0nWbJJvkSKt8lVxO1a1h0HcoyUSaBIqEkHM1dv41NSBr87SHBOBk3pFrjUQt2SfTumkxOJDK2PgAjYFzd0Hpf17xcBpMj9+y9BoILaBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) by DM5PR12MB1516.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:5::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3805.16; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:10 +0000 Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d6b:736:fa28:5e4]) by DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d6b:736:fa28:5e4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3805.025; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:21:09 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Leon Romanovsky CC: Doug Ledford , Parav Pandit , , Mark Bloch Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 07/10] IB/mlx5: Return appropriate error code instead of ENOMEM Message-ID: <20210202152109.GA617190@nvidia.com> References: <20210127150010.1876121-1-leon@kernel.org> <20210127150010.1876121-8-leon@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210127150010.1876121-8-leon@kernel.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR16CA0007.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:134::20) To DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from mlx.ziepe.ca (142.162.115.133) by MN2PR16CA0007.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:134::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3825.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:10 +0000 Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUL-002aZk-CN; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:21:09 -0400 X-Header: ProcessedBy-CMR-outbound DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1612279276; bh=Et2Gr31MBoQ7d2Nf3+cdQcXOU+/1zCpWMIdjhCH3LwA=; h=ARC-Seal:ARC-Message-Signature:ARC-Authentication-Results:Date: From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:X-ClientProxiedBy:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType:X-Header; b=nAXJxr2AxvPAEjM/SuHCCZg5KTS5+DLpL83pFrmv3MM+sbd2jI5sq2G3EmWi1Qcf2 hF9roy8bQbwTSml0kn4oAx5+Ww8XISj9Lty10ZOEkE3vnXQYvmEzS0S2iD1n4KUIwH I5UjrPAjWonMOWf48/LKr9q1s2o06DRTenFvAsFi6YtogQNg7wolByqdSckzJARl8W mbq4ZDCojP79m3mgkkQ15waHLxZIVrC+6OPKlFXLujQsSIOvFJCNIYoJ9QQqWfb0L1 TojD0vPJwmBsFLE+Ibg2gtKbrb/31KwpDZXDVTlpDo3MWtYAcynMZyNp/wZnf2MoRg YKllGGWbM1CCw== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Parav Pandit > > When mlx5_ib_stage_init_init() fails, return the error code related to > failure instead of -ENOMEM. > > Fixes: 16c1975f1032 ("IB/mlx5: Create profile infrastructure to add and remove stages") > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 3 +-- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c | 4 ---- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > index ad7bb37e501d..9e8b4d591138 100644 > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > @@ -3952,8 +3952,7 @@ static int mlx5_ib_stage_init_init(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev) > > err_mp: > mlx5_ib_cleanup_multiport_master(dev); > - > - return -ENOMEM; > + return err; > } > > static int mlx5_ib_enable_driver(struct ib_device *dev) > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c > index f4b82daf1e22..a1be8fb2800e 100644 > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c > @@ -484,10 +484,6 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *implicit_get_child_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr, > } > > xa_lock(&imr->implicit_children); > - /* > - * Once the store to either xarray completes any error unwind has to > - * use synchronize_srcu(). Avoid this with xa_reserve() > - */ It is not wrong to remove this comment, but why is it in this patch? Jason