All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] fanotify: limit number of event merge attempts
Date: Tue,  2 Feb 2021 18:20:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210202162010.305971-6-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202162010.305971-1-amir73il@gmail.com>

Event merges are expensive when event queue size is large.
Limit the linear search to 128 merge tests.
In combination with 128 hash lists, there is a potential to
merge with up to 16K events in the hashed queue.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index 12df6957e4d8..6d3807012851 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -129,11 +129,15 @@ static bool fanotify_should_merge(struct fsnotify_event *old_fsn,
 	return false;
 }
 
+/* Limit event merges to limit CPU overhead per event */
+#define FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_EVENTS 128
+
 /* and the list better be locked by something too! */
 static int fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list, struct fsnotify_event *event)
 {
 	struct fsnotify_event *test_event;
 	struct fanotify_event *new;
+	int i = 0;
 
 	pr_debug("%s: list=%p event=%p\n", __func__, list, event);
 	new = FANOTIFY_E(event);
@@ -147,6 +151,8 @@ static int fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list, struct fsnotify_event *event)
 		return 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(test_event, list, list) {
+		if (++i > FANOTIFY_MAX_MERGE_EVENTS)
+			break;
 		if (fanotify_should_merge(test_event, event)) {
 			FANOTIFY_E(test_event)->mask |= new->mask;
 			return 1;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 16:20 [PATCH 0/7] Performance improvement for fanotify merge Amir Goldstein
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] fsnotify: allow fsnotify_{peek,remove}_first_event with empty queue Amir Goldstein
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] fsnotify: support hashed notification queue Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 15:02   ` Jan Kara
2021-02-17 12:33     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-17 13:48       ` Jan Kara
2021-02-17 15:42         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-17 16:49           ` Jan Kara
2021-02-18 10:52           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] fsnotify: read events from hashed notification queue by order of insertion Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 15:10   ` Jan Kara
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] fanotify: enable hashed notification queue for FAN_CLASS_NOTIF groups Amir Goldstein
2021-02-02 16:20 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2021-02-27  8:31   ` [PATCH 5/7] fanotify: limit number of event merge attempts Amir Goldstein
2021-03-01 13:08     ` Jan Kara
2021-03-01 13:58       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-09-15 12:39       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-09-15 16:33         ` Jan Kara
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] fanotify: mix event info into merge key hash Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 15:39   ` Jan Kara
2021-02-17 10:13     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 10:46       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 11:11         ` Jan Kara
2021-02-18 12:17           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] fsnotify: print some debug stats on hashed queue overflow Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/7] Performance improvement for fanotify merge Jan Kara
2021-02-17 10:52   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-17 11:25     ` Jan Kara
2021-02-18 10:56       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 11:15         ` Jan Kara
2021-02-18 12:35           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-19 10:15             ` Jan Kara
2021-02-19 10:21               ` Jan Kara
2021-02-19 13:38                 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-21 12:53                   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-22  9:29                     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210202162010.305971-6-amir73il@gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.