Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec

From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:57:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204105748.GD2789116@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <249f1a7c-048e-d255-d860-68a97a0092c8@redhat.com>

On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On 1/20/21 10:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > Here is v4 of my series to add support for Intel Bay Trail based devices
> > which use a WM5102 codec for audio output/input.
> > 
> > This was developed and tested on a Lenovo Yoga Tablet 1051L.
> > 
> > The MFD and ASoC parts do not have any build-time dependencies
> > on each other. But the follow-up jack-detect series does have
> > patches depending on each-other and on this series. So IMHO it
> > would be best if this entire series would be merged through the
> > MFD tree to make merging the follow-up series easier.
> > 
> > Mark, if that is ok with you (and you are happy with the ASoC
> > changes) can you please Ack this ?
> 
> I believe that this series and the follow-up:
> 
> "[PATCH v4 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support"
> 
> series are both ready for merging. All patches have Reviewed-by and/or
> Acked-by tags now.

I don't think they do.  You're missing ASoC and Extcon Acks.

Not sure why *this* set fell through the cracks though.  However, it's
now on my to-review list.

If I can work fast enough, maybe this series can get into 5.12, but
the follow-up still needs reviews.

It might be best to collect the *-bys you do have and [RESEND].

> I guess it is too late for 5.12, but it would be nice to at least formulate
> a plan for getting this merged after 5.12-rc1 is out. Given the
> interdependencies I still believe that it is best to merge all the patches
> through the mfd tree and then have Lee provide an immutable branch for the
> other subsystems to merge.

Yes, that's fine.

> Mark and extcon-maintainers (for the follow-up series) may we have your ack
> for merging these through the MFD tree ?

Ah, you noticed that too!

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog