All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:04:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204140410.GB4288@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e646cd26-f61c-8414-c3ae-15fb5d5cc21d@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1237 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:18:54PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 2/4/21 1:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The usual pattern here is that the MFD patches get merged and then I
> > pull a shared branch in for any dependencies - at this point the series
> > is now on the backlog of serieses where I'm waiting for the MFD to sort
> > itself out before I really look at it again.

> I understand. But this series is somewhat special, if you also take
> the follow-up series into account:

> "[PATCH v4 resend 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support"

> That again has some MFD bits, and some extcon patches and ASoC patches
> which depend on the extcon bits and this series.

That series is drifting along in the same way AFAICT, and it's also got
the extcon dependency so it'll need to leave it a bit longer for extcon
review (unless some happens sooner).

> So it is really hard to merge all the bits through there separate trees
> and just merging it all through one tree and then pulling in the end-result
> as a shared branch would IMHO be easier.

Most of this for me is just about not wanting to have to repeatedly look
at the same series as it goes through small changes due to changes in
the dependencies.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:04:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204140410.GB4288@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e646cd26-f61c-8414-c3ae-15fb5d5cc21d@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1237 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:18:54PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 2/4/21 1:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The usual pattern here is that the MFD patches get merged and then I
> > pull a shared branch in for any dependencies - at this point the series
> > is now on the backlog of serieses where I'm waiting for the MFD to sort
> > itself out before I really look at it again.

> I understand. But this series is somewhat special, if you also take
> the follow-up series into account:

> "[PATCH v4 resend 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support"

> That again has some MFD bits, and some extcon patches and ASoC patches
> which depend on the extcon bits and this series.

That series is drifting along in the same way AFAICT, and it's also got
the extcon dependency so it'll need to leave it a bit longer for extcon
review (unless some happens sooner).

> So it is really hard to merge all the bits through there separate trees
> and just merging it all through one tree and then pulling in the end-result
> as a shared branch would IMHO be easier.

Most of this for me is just about not wanting to have to repeatedly look
at the same series as it goes through small changes due to changes in
the dependencies.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-20 21:49 [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49 ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: arizona: Add MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: arizona_ldo1") Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49   ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 13:55   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:55     ` Lee Jones
2021-01-20 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: arizona: Replace arizona_of_get_type() with device_get_match_data() Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49   ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 13:55   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:55     ` Lee Jones
2021-01-20 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mfd: arizona: Add support for ACPI enumeration of WM5102 connected over SPI Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49   ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-21 10:34   ` Charles Keepax
2021-01-21 10:34     ` Charles Keepax
2021-02-04 13:55   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:55     ` Lee Jones
2021-01-20 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to soc_intel_is_byt_cr() Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49   ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 13:56   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:56     ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 14:05     ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 14:05       ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 15:04       ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 15:04         ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 15:11         ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 15:11           ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 15:40           ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 15:40             ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 19:42             ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 19:42               ` Mark Brown
2021-02-05  8:34               ` Lee Jones
2021-02-05  8:34                 ` Lee Jones
2021-02-05 21:11                 ` Mark Brown
2021-02-05 21:11                   ` Mark Brown
2021-02-08  8:33                   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-08  8:33                     ` Lee Jones
2021-02-08 15:24                     ` Mark Brown
2021-02-08 15:24                       ` Mark Brown
2021-01-20 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: Add machine driver for BYT/WM5102 Hans de Goede
2021-01-20 21:49   ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-21 10:37   ` Charles Keepax
2021-01-21 10:37     ` Charles Keepax
2021-02-04 13:56   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:56     ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 10:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 10:25   ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 10:57   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 10:57     ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 11:07     ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 11:07       ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 12:43       ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 12:43         ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 13:18         ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 13:18           ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-04 14:04           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-02-04 14:04             ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 13:46         ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 13:46           ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 15:09           ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 15:09             ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 15:21             ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 15:21               ` Lee Jones
2021-02-04 16:48               ` Mark Brown
2021-02-04 16:48                 ` Mark Brown
2021-02-08 13:52 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch from MFD due for the v5.12 merge window Lee Jones
2021-02-08 13:52   ` Lee Jones
2021-02-08 18:38 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec Mark Brown
2021-02-08 18:38   ` Mark Brown
2021-02-08 19:12   ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-08 19:12     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210204140410.GB4288@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.