From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFEEC43381 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D1564EBC for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232366AbhBJRZ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:25:28 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42266 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232172AbhBJRZY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:25:24 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0EBAC97; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:24:43 +0100 From: Daniel Wagner To: Peter Xu Cc: Clark Williams , John Kacur , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rt-tests v2 11/18] ptsematest: Streamline usage output and man page Message-ID: <20210210172443.p775wkadhpzi4xqf@beryllium.lan> References: <20201007085653.11961-1-dwagner@suse.de> <20201007085653.11961-12-dwagner@suse.de> <20210210160847.GI103365@xz-x1> <20210210162559.GJ103365@xz-x1> <20210210163057.ts3zy274abnsnlvn@beryllium.lan> <20210210163537.t2tt3nyuqgkfzbl3@beryllium.lan> <20210210170015.GL103365@xz-x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210210170015.GL103365@xz-x1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org > It makes sense to make all binaries in rt-tests behave similarly, so regarding > "oslat -v" even if it's not my preference, it's fine to me. We could also update all other tools to just print the version string for '--version'. I don't have a strong preference. My main concern is that I don't want the tools to differ in the usage pattern. BTW, I think I would drop '-v' as short command line option as for example cyclictest uses '-v' for verbose. > Again - Would you consider also dump the version in the output as before even > for a normal run? Again, I don't have a strong opinion here. Just the same argument as before, all tools should behave in the same way.