From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6ABC433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0944A64D9D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229501AbhBKHVg (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:21:36 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:54258 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229451AbhBKHVg (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:21:36 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3FDA16736F; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:20:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:20:53 +0100 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Chaitanya Kulkarni Cc: "hch@lst.de" , Damien Le Moal , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/9] nvmet: add ZBD backend support Message-ID: <20210211072053.GA14044@lst.de> References: <20210112042623.6316-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:42:42PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > I can see that Damien's granularity series is in the linux-block tree, I'm > planning to send v10 of this series given that it also has a block layer > patch > [1] should I use the linux-block/for-next or linux-nvme/nvme-5.12 ? I'd just wait for -rc1. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CA0C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3E564E25 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:21:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D3E564E25 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SqxxTW4/lJrdaTq8yQTnNzYl+pLaFR2IScdBskpwYxM=; b=YYAD0EmJ0SjNOuWDSQcjoFp2W RQoa1Rz5crJfd2I7jte4kW2dkqapEU3v+hVDPsBmyN12a69NgM3BzFd9jGlnqASLK7sQlg4wQK3bO 76p07ImK098jM/wcw6KCheiVHdV/hK+NxzBFhVs1PL2sZGNUhtMmlnN+plH+Csw/Bzgn1x+MQNMnv Ys/od/g8/fEJ2XuAPP1wRhQTINfbXZa3vPO4qQL3kDV/jA5NJEiCChaRMJFI5tsuPN1w1jrziP+kW JjDCwGH4ss05F53jXwXUbp7YmJIUsQYN0T3CVvqFb75WDSg8/4wLg5RGGkmzttrnAoQt03nLx7a9h Cj9D6bJeQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lA6HZ-00044B-RV; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:20:57 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lA6HX-00043s-Af for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:20:56 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3FDA16736F; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:20:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:20:53 +0100 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Chaitanya Kulkarni Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/9] nvmet: add ZBD backend support Message-ID: <20210211072053.GA14044@lst.de> References: <20210112042623.6316-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210211_022055_928972_697C2491 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.70 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Damien Le Moal , "hch@lst.de" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "sagi@grimberg.me" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:42:42PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > I can see that Damien's granularity series is in the linux-block tree, I'm > planning to send v10 of this series given that it also has a block layer > patch > [1] should I use the linux-block/for-next or linux-nvme/nvme-5.12 ? I'd just wait for -rc1. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme