All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:17:31 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215091731.3773315b@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202134559.175ae62f@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1681 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:45:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dffd1df2d29a ("iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND")
> 
> from the btrfs tree and commit:
> 
>   3e1a88ec9625 ("bio: add a helper calculating nr segments to alloc")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index e4c258a2cefc,ea1e8f696076..000000000000
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@@ -292,13 -260,7 +289,14 @@@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode
>   			iomap_dio_zero(dio, iomap, pos - pad, pad);
>   	}
>   
>  +	/*
>  +	 * Set the operation flags early so that bio_iov_iter_get_pages
>  +	 * can set up the page vector appropriately for a ZONE_APPEND
>  +	 * operation.
>  +	 */
>  +	bio_opf = iomap_dio_bio_opflags(dio, iomap, use_fua);
>  +
> + 	nr_pages = bio_iov_vecs_to_alloc(dio->submit.iter, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
>   	do {
>   		size_t n;
>   		if (dio->error) {

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

The btrfs tree commit is now

  c3b0e880bbfa ("iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-14 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  2:45 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 22:17 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-21  2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-21  5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-15  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-07  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-09  2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-24  4:16 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-24  4:16 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-24  4:15 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-24  4:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-09  4:01 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210215091731.3773315b@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.