Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] hw/sd: sdhci: Fixes to CVE-2020-17380, CVE-2020-25085, CVE-2021-3409

[Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>]

Hi Bin,
For this series,
Tested-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>

Thank you
-Alex



On 210216 1146, Bin Meng wrote:
> This series includes several fixes to CVE-2020-17380, CVE-2020-25085
> and CVE-2021-3409 that are heap-based buffer overflow issues existing
> in the sdhci model.
> 
> These CVEs are pretty much similar, and were filed using different
> reproducers. With this series, current known reproducers I have
> cannot be reproduced any more.
> 
> The implementation of this model still has some issues, e.g.: some codes
> do not seem to strictly match the spec, but since this series only aimes
> to address CVEs, such issue should be fixed in a separate series in the
> future, if I have time :)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - new patch: sdhci: Limit block size only when SDHC_BLKSIZE register is writable
> - new patch: sdhci: Reset the data pointer of s->fifo_buffer[] when a different block size is programmed
> 
> Bin Meng (6):
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Don't transfer any data when command time out
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Don't write to SDHC_SYSAD register when transfer is in
>     progress
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Correctly set the controller status for ADMA
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Simplify updating s->prnsts in
>     sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks()
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Limit block size only when SDHC_BLKSIZE register is
>     writable
>   hw/sd: sdhci: Reset the data pointer of s->fifo_buffer[] when a
>     different block size is programmed
> 
>  hw/sd/sdhci.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>