From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8220DC433DB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C03064E28 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234203AbhBQQsr (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:48:47 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:34114 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234273AbhBQQsh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:48:37 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C986DED1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from slackpad.fritz.box (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B1E53F73B; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:46:47 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Alexandru Elisei Cc: Will Deacon , Julien Thierry , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Message-ID: <20210217155459.3a4bc991@slackpad.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> <814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com> <20210211171648.36000cce@slackpad.fritz.box> <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> Organization: Arm Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:32:01 +0000 Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi, > On 2/11/21 5:16 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:59 +0000 > > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > >> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > >>> Since x86 had a special need for registering tons of special I/O ports, > >>> we had an ioport__setup_arch() callback, to allow each architecture > >>> to do the same. As it turns out no one uses it beside x86, so we remove > >>> that unnecessary abstraction. > >>> > >>> The generic function was registered via a device_base_init() call, so > >>> we just do the same for the x86 specific function only, and can remove > >>> the unneeded ioport__setup_arch(). > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >>> --- > >>> arm/ioport.c | 5 ----- > >>> include/kvm/ioport.h | 1 - > >>> ioport.c | 28 ---------------------------- > >>> mips/kvm.c | 5 ----- > >>> powerpc/ioport.c | 6 ------ > >>> x86/ioport.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > >>> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arm/ioport.c b/arm/ioport.c > >>> index 2f0feb9a..24092c9d 100644 > >>> --- a/arm/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/arm/ioport.c > >>> @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@ > >>> #include "kvm/ioport.h" > >>> #include "kvm/irq.h" > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> *irq = irq__alloc_line(); > >>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> index 039633f7..d0213541 100644 > >>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct ioport_operations { > >>> enum irq_type)); > >>> }; > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm); > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq); > >>> > >>> int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, > >>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c > >>> index 844a832d..667e8386 100644 > >>> --- a/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/ioport.c > >>> @@ -158,21 +158,6 @@ int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port) > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> -static void ioport__unregister_all(void) > >>> -{ > >>> - struct ioport *entry; > >>> - struct rb_node *rb; > >>> - struct rb_int_node *rb_node; > >>> - > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - while (rb) { > >>> - rb_node = rb_int(rb); > >>> - entry = ioport_node(rb_node); > >>> - ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry); > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - } > >>> -} > >> I get the impression this is a rebasing artifact. The commit message doesn't > >> mention anything about removing ioport__exit() -> ioport__unregister_all(), and as > >> far as I can tell it's still needed because there are places other than > >> ioport__setup_arch() from where ioport__register() is called. > > I agree that the commit message is a bit thin on this fact, but the > > functionality of ioport__unregister_all() is now in > > x86/ioport.c:ioport__remove_arch(). I think removing ioport__init() > > without removing ioport__exit() as well would look very weird, if not > > hackish. > > Not necessarily. ioport__unregister_all() removes the ioports added by > x86/ioport.c::ioport__setup_arch(), *plus* ioports added by different devices, > like serial, rtc, virtio-pci and vfio-pci (which are used by arm/arm64). Right, indeed. Not that it really matters, since we are about to exit anyway, but it looks indeed I need to move this to a generic teardown method, or actually just keep that part here in this file. Will give this a try. Thanks! Andre > > > > I can amend the commit message to mention this, or is there anything > > else I missed? > > > > Cheers, > > Andre > > > >>> - > >>> static const char *to_direction(int direction) > >>> { > >>> if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN) > >>> @@ -220,16 +205,3 @@ out: > >>> > >>> return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug; > >>> } > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return ioport__setup_arch(kvm); > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_init(ioport__init); > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - ioport__unregister_all(); > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_exit(ioport__exit); > >>> diff --git a/mips/kvm.c b/mips/kvm.c > >>> index 26355930..e110e5d5 100644 > >>> --- a/mips/kvm.c > >>> +++ b/mips/kvm.c > >>> @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq) > >>> die_perror("KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl"); > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> bool kvm__arch_cpu_supports_vm(void) > >>> { > >>> return true; > >>> diff --git a/powerpc/ioport.c b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> index 0c188b61..a5cff4ee 100644 > >>> --- a/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> @@ -12,12 +12,6 @@ > >>> > >>> #include > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - /* PPC has no legacy ioports to set up */ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > >>> index 7ad7b8f3..8c5c7699 100644 > >>> --- a/x86/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/x86/ioport.c > >>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> { > >>> int r; > >>> > >>> @@ -150,3 +150,26 @@ int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> +dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > >>> + > >>> +static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +{ > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> +dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0413BC433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E45864E45 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:47:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6E45864E45 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091F54B36B; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iKBv49dhAsVg; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A1D4B2FB; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FAD4B2EC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:53 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ij2TFlqXz9hy for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5914B2C1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:47:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C986DED1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from slackpad.fritz.box (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B1E53F73B; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:46:47 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Alexandru Elisei Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Message-ID: <20210217155459.3a4bc991@slackpad.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> <814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com> <20210211171648.36000cce@slackpad.fritz.box> <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> Organization: Arm Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:32:01 +0000 Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi, > On 2/11/21 5:16 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:59 +0000 > > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > >> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > >>> Since x86 had a special need for registering tons of special I/O ports, > >>> we had an ioport__setup_arch() callback, to allow each architecture > >>> to do the same. As it turns out no one uses it beside x86, so we remove > >>> that unnecessary abstraction. > >>> > >>> The generic function was registered via a device_base_init() call, so > >>> we just do the same for the x86 specific function only, and can remove > >>> the unneeded ioport__setup_arch(). > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >>> --- > >>> arm/ioport.c | 5 ----- > >>> include/kvm/ioport.h | 1 - > >>> ioport.c | 28 ---------------------------- > >>> mips/kvm.c | 5 ----- > >>> powerpc/ioport.c | 6 ------ > >>> x86/ioport.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > >>> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arm/ioport.c b/arm/ioport.c > >>> index 2f0feb9a..24092c9d 100644 > >>> --- a/arm/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/arm/ioport.c > >>> @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@ > >>> #include "kvm/ioport.h" > >>> #include "kvm/irq.h" > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> *irq = irq__alloc_line(); > >>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> index 039633f7..d0213541 100644 > >>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct ioport_operations { > >>> enum irq_type)); > >>> }; > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm); > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq); > >>> > >>> int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, > >>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c > >>> index 844a832d..667e8386 100644 > >>> --- a/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/ioport.c > >>> @@ -158,21 +158,6 @@ int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port) > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> -static void ioport__unregister_all(void) > >>> -{ > >>> - struct ioport *entry; > >>> - struct rb_node *rb; > >>> - struct rb_int_node *rb_node; > >>> - > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - while (rb) { > >>> - rb_node = rb_int(rb); > >>> - entry = ioport_node(rb_node); > >>> - ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry); > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - } > >>> -} > >> I get the impression this is a rebasing artifact. The commit message doesn't > >> mention anything about removing ioport__exit() -> ioport__unregister_all(), and as > >> far as I can tell it's still needed because there are places other than > >> ioport__setup_arch() from where ioport__register() is called. > > I agree that the commit message is a bit thin on this fact, but the > > functionality of ioport__unregister_all() is now in > > x86/ioport.c:ioport__remove_arch(). I think removing ioport__init() > > without removing ioport__exit() as well would look very weird, if not > > hackish. > > Not necessarily. ioport__unregister_all() removes the ioports added by > x86/ioport.c::ioport__setup_arch(), *plus* ioports added by different devices, > like serial, rtc, virtio-pci and vfio-pci (which are used by arm/arm64). Right, indeed. Not that it really matters, since we are about to exit anyway, but it looks indeed I need to move this to a generic teardown method, or actually just keep that part here in this file. Will give this a try. Thanks! Andre > > > > I can amend the commit message to mention this, or is there anything > > else I missed? > > > > Cheers, > > Andre > > > >>> - > >>> static const char *to_direction(int direction) > >>> { > >>> if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN) > >>> @@ -220,16 +205,3 @@ out: > >>> > >>> return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug; > >>> } > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return ioport__setup_arch(kvm); > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_init(ioport__init); > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - ioport__unregister_all(); > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_exit(ioport__exit); > >>> diff --git a/mips/kvm.c b/mips/kvm.c > >>> index 26355930..e110e5d5 100644 > >>> --- a/mips/kvm.c > >>> +++ b/mips/kvm.c > >>> @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq) > >>> die_perror("KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl"); > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> bool kvm__arch_cpu_supports_vm(void) > >>> { > >>> return true; > >>> diff --git a/powerpc/ioport.c b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> index 0c188b61..a5cff4ee 100644 > >>> --- a/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> @@ -12,12 +12,6 @@ > >>> > >>> #include > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - /* PPC has no legacy ioports to set up */ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > >>> index 7ad7b8f3..8c5c7699 100644 > >>> --- a/x86/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/x86/ioport.c > >>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> { > >>> int r; > >>> > >>> @@ -150,3 +150,26 @@ int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> +dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > >>> + > >>> +static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +{ > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> +dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F48C433E6 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D453164E28 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:49:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D453164E28 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=bk1eOFfeeUMfslu30k4HQP9SIR1TDhrpHGOpoSdWwM8=; b=0X9+yQut2AqUr3W0mGD1J3kfY WKLfRyBGzSRd7/w5nbPezpdruUEB7CL2jG4LuHcot/zAtYRta0z9H42oq6nIPzXk1W38QbX2/OAV5 5tWOKOYD+x6TpYWea7LUM445hXTKKlnh3mKSia3gRh1ofOwCoJldZdbSiZq14RbyK+w+6bkiaDDx0 Ko8QFkh3BsJvqLuOKasWbhaWpU/0lRjERFUazVAkoyGWX5vbdWI7qKhhN9j7UoMZWiUiOYNNYBzh6 bbVOpKbTAZ4GfPcqAjeKna0g5cyRzTxFa0Bm4b8y4JxzUyV6Q6P8hxLS84MNiN7sU+7ZkCka+y7OR z5cuzhCFw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lCPze-0000Ip-PG; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:02 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lCPzb-0000Hj-Ek for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:00 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C986DED1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from slackpad.fritz.box (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B1E53F73B; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:47:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:46:47 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Alexandru Elisei Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Message-ID: <20210217155459.3a4bc991@slackpad.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> <814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com> <20210211171648.36000cce@slackpad.fritz.box> <111b6cd6-ddf3-ec67-b782-67120be97943@arm.com> Organization: Arm Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210217_114759_658098_6C3DD167 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Julien Thierry , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:32:01 +0000 Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi, > On 2/11/21 5:16 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:59 +0000 > > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > >> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > >>> Since x86 had a special need for registering tons of special I/O ports, > >>> we had an ioport__setup_arch() callback, to allow each architecture > >>> to do the same. As it turns out no one uses it beside x86, so we remove > >>> that unnecessary abstraction. > >>> > >>> The generic function was registered via a device_base_init() call, so > >>> we just do the same for the x86 specific function only, and can remove > >>> the unneeded ioport__setup_arch(). > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >>> --- > >>> arm/ioport.c | 5 ----- > >>> include/kvm/ioport.h | 1 - > >>> ioport.c | 28 ---------------------------- > >>> mips/kvm.c | 5 ----- > >>> powerpc/ioport.c | 6 ------ > >>> x86/ioport.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > >>> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arm/ioport.c b/arm/ioport.c > >>> index 2f0feb9a..24092c9d 100644 > >>> --- a/arm/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/arm/ioport.c > >>> @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@ > >>> #include "kvm/ioport.h" > >>> #include "kvm/irq.h" > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> *irq = irq__alloc_line(); > >>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> index 039633f7..d0213541 100644 > >>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h > >>> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct ioport_operations { > >>> enum irq_type)); > >>> }; > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm); > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq); > >>> > >>> int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, > >>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c > >>> index 844a832d..667e8386 100644 > >>> --- a/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/ioport.c > >>> @@ -158,21 +158,6 @@ int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port) > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> -static void ioport__unregister_all(void) > >>> -{ > >>> - struct ioport *entry; > >>> - struct rb_node *rb; > >>> - struct rb_int_node *rb_node; > >>> - > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - while (rb) { > >>> - rb_node = rb_int(rb); > >>> - entry = ioport_node(rb_node); > >>> - ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry); > >>> - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > >>> - } > >>> -} > >> I get the impression this is a rebasing artifact. The commit message doesn't > >> mention anything about removing ioport__exit() -> ioport__unregister_all(), and as > >> far as I can tell it's still needed because there are places other than > >> ioport__setup_arch() from where ioport__register() is called. > > I agree that the commit message is a bit thin on this fact, but the > > functionality of ioport__unregister_all() is now in > > x86/ioport.c:ioport__remove_arch(). I think removing ioport__init() > > without removing ioport__exit() as well would look very weird, if not > > hackish. > > Not necessarily. ioport__unregister_all() removes the ioports added by > x86/ioport.c::ioport__setup_arch(), *plus* ioports added by different devices, > like serial, rtc, virtio-pci and vfio-pci (which are used by arm/arm64). Right, indeed. Not that it really matters, since we are about to exit anyway, but it looks indeed I need to move this to a generic teardown method, or actually just keep that part here in this file. Will give this a try. Thanks! Andre > > > > I can amend the commit message to mention this, or is there anything > > else I missed? > > > > Cheers, > > Andre > > > >>> - > >>> static const char *to_direction(int direction) > >>> { > >>> if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN) > >>> @@ -220,16 +205,3 @@ out: > >>> > >>> return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug; > >>> } > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return ioport__setup_arch(kvm); > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_init(ioport__init); > >>> - > >>> -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - ioport__unregister_all(); > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> -dev_base_exit(ioport__exit); > >>> diff --git a/mips/kvm.c b/mips/kvm.c > >>> index 26355930..e110e5d5 100644 > >>> --- a/mips/kvm.c > >>> +++ b/mips/kvm.c > >>> @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq) > >>> die_perror("KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl"); > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> bool kvm__arch_cpu_supports_vm(void) > >>> { > >>> return true; > >>> diff --git a/powerpc/ioport.c b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> index 0c188b61..a5cff4ee 100644 > >>> --- a/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/powerpc/ioport.c > >>> @@ -12,12 +12,6 @@ > >>> > >>> #include > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> -{ > >>> - /* PPC has no legacy ioports to set up */ > >>> - return 0; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > >>> index 7ad7b8f3..8c5c7699 100644 > >>> --- a/x86/ioport.c > >>> +++ b/x86/ioport.c > >>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > >>> { > >>> } > >>> > >>> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> { > >>> int r; > >>> > >>> @@ -150,3 +150,26 @@ int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> +dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > >>> + > >>> +static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > >>> +{ > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > >>> + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> +dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel