All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	sboyd@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Mark.Rutland@arm.com,
	maz@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, clm@fb.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:29:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217212923.21418-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210217212814.GA14952@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

Although smp_call_function() has the advantage of simplicity, using
it to check for cross-CPU clock desynchronization means that any CPU
being slow reduces the sensitivity of the checking across all CPUs.
And it is not uncommon for smp_call_function() latencies to be in the
hundreds of microseconds.

This commit therefore switches to smp_call_function_single(), so that
delays from a given CPU affect only those measurements involving that
particular CPU.

Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/time/clocksource.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index df48416..4161c84 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay(void)
 }
 
 static struct clocksource *clocksource_verify_work_cs;
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, csnow_mid);
+static u64 csnow_mid;
 static cpumask_t cpus_ahead;
 static cpumask_t cpus_behind;
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void clocksource_verify_one_cpu(void *csin)
 		sign = ((smp_processor_id() >> inject_delay_shift_percpu) & 0x1) * 2 - 1;
 		delta = sign * NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	}
-	__this_cpu_write(csnow_mid, cs->read(cs) + delta);
+	csnow_mid = cs->read(cs) + delta;
 }
 
 static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
@@ -236,9 +236,12 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 	int cpu;
 	struct clocksource *cs;
 	int64_t cs_nsec;
+	int64_t cs_nsec_max;
+	int64_t cs_nsec_min;
 	u64 csnow_begin;
 	u64 csnow_end;
-	u64 delta;
+	s64 delta;
+	bool firsttime = 1;
 
 	cs = smp_load_acquire(&clocksource_verify_work_cs); // pairs with release
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cs))
@@ -247,19 +250,28 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 		cs->name, smp_processor_id());
 	cpumask_clear(&cpus_ahead);
 	cpumask_clear(&cpus_behind);
-	csnow_begin = cs->read(cs);
-	smp_call_function(clocksource_verify_one_cpu, cs, 1);
-	csnow_end = cs->read(cs);
+	preempt_disable();
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
 			continue;
-		delta = (per_cpu(csnow_mid, cpu) - csnow_begin) & cs->mask;
-		if ((s64)delta < 0)
+		csnow_begin = cs->read(cs);
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, clocksource_verify_one_cpu, cs, 1);
+		csnow_end = cs->read(cs);
+		delta = (s64)((csnow_mid - csnow_begin) & cs->mask);
+		if (delta < 0)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpus_behind);
-		delta = (csnow_end - per_cpu(csnow_mid, cpu)) & cs->mask;
-		if ((s64)delta < 0)
+		delta = (csnow_end - csnow_mid) & cs->mask;
+		if (delta < 0)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpus_ahead);
+		delta = clocksource_delta(csnow_end, csnow_begin, cs->mask);
+		cs_nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, cs->mult, cs->shift);
+		if (firsttime || cs_nsec > cs_nsec_max)
+			cs_nsec_max = cs_nsec;
+		if (firsttime || cs_nsec < cs_nsec_min)
+			cs_nsec_min = cs_nsec;
+		firsttime = 0;
 	}
+	preempt_enable();
 	if (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead))
 		pr_warn("        CPUs %*pbl ahead of CPU %d for clocksource %s.\n",
 			cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_ahead),
@@ -268,12 +280,9 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 		pr_warn("        CPUs %*pbl behind CPU %d for clocksource %s.\n",
 			cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_behind),
 			smp_processor_id(), cs->name);
-	if (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead) || !cpumask_empty(&cpus_behind)) {
-		delta = clocksource_delta(csnow_end, csnow_begin, cs->mask);
-		cs_nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, cs->mult, cs->shift);
-		pr_warn("        CPU %d duration %lldns for clocksource %s.\n",
-			smp_processor_id(), cs_nsec, cs->name);
-	}
+	if (!firsttime && (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead) || !cpumask_empty(&cpus_behind)))
+		pr_warn("        CPU %d check durations %lldns - %lldns for clocksource %s.\n",
+			smp_processor_id(), cs_nsec_min, cs_nsec_max, cs->name);
 	smp_store_release(&clocksource_verify_work_cs, NULL); // pairs with acquire.
 }
 
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06  0:40 [PATCH RFC clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-01-06 16:28   ` Rik van Riel
2021-01-06 19:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-06 20:59       ` Rik van Riel
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-01-12  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-02-02 17:04   ` [PATCH v3 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-02-02 19:51       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-03  0:50         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-03  1:31           ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-03  1:40             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-02-17 21:28     ` [PATCH v3 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` paulmck [this message]
2021-03-04  0:49       ` [PATCH v5 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-04-02 20:29         ` [PATCH v5 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-04-02 22:22             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-02 22:37               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:48               ` [PATCH v7 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-04-10  8:41                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-10 23:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-04-10  9:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11  0:20                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-11 10:33                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11 16:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12  4:21                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 13:08                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 18:20                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 18:54                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 19:57                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 20:37                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 23:18                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-13 20:49                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-14  4:48                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-04-10  9:04                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11  0:21                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-10  8:01                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-10 23:26                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-11 10:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11 16:50                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217212923.21418-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.