All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
To: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@nxp.com>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rt: cpufreq: Fix cpu hotplug hang
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210219084420.23379-1-ran.wang_1@nxp.com> (raw)

When selecting PREEMPT_RT, cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy) might got
stuck due to irq_work_sync() pending for work on lazy_list. That’s
because lazy_list may have no chance to be served in softirq context
sometimes. Below is one of scenarios that was captured:

...
ret_from_fork
 kthread
  smpboot_thread_fn
   cpuhp_thread_fun
    cpuhp_invoke_callback: state: 193
     cpuhp_cpufreq_online
      cpufreq_online
       cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
        cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop
         sugov_stop  // kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
          irq_work_sync(&sg_policy->irq_work);

This is observed on LX2160ARDB (16 A72 cores) with cpufreq governor of
‘schedutil’ or ‘ondemand’.

Configure related irqwork to run on raw-irq context could fix this.

Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 63f7c219062b..731a7b1434df 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *poli
 	policy_dbs->policy = policy;
 	mutex_init(&policy_dbs->update_mutex);
 	atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0);
-	init_irq_work(&policy_dbs->irq_work, dbs_irq_work);
+	policy_dbs->irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(dbs_irq_work);
 	INIT_WORK(&policy_dbs->work, dbs_work_handler);
 
 	/* Set policy_dbs for all CPUs, online+offline */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 6931f0cdeb80..054a01ef4f57 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 
 	sg_policy->thread = thread;
 	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
-	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
+	sg_policy->irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(sugov_irq_work);
 	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);
 
 	wake_up_process(thread);
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19  8:44 Ran Wang [this message]
2021-02-22 14:01 ` [PATCH] rt: cpufreq: Fix cpu hotplug hang Sebastian Siewior
2021-02-23  2:26   ` Ran Wang
2021-02-23  3:13     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-02-24 16:37       ` Sebastian Siewior
2021-02-25  2:31         ` Ran Wang
2021-03-23  7:00         ` Ran Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210219084420.23379-1-ran.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --to=ran.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jiafei.pan@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.