All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH kernel v2] powerpc/iommu: Annotate nested lock for lockdep
Date: Mon,  1 Mar 2021 17:36:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301063653.51003-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> (raw)

The IOMMU table is divided into pools for concurrent mappings and each
pool has a separate spinlock. When taking the ownership of an IOMMU group
to pass through a device to a VM, we lock these spinlocks which triggers
a false negative warning in lockdep (below).

This fixes it by annotating the large pool's spinlock as a nest lock
which makes lockdep not complaining when locking nested locks if
the nest lock is locked already.

===
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.11.0-le_syzkaller_a+fstn1 #100 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
qemu-system-ppc/4129 is trying to acquire lock:
c0000000119bddb0 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0

but task is already holding lock:
c0000000119bdd30 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(p->lock)/1);
  lock(&(p->lock)/1);
===

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
Changes:
v2:
* fixed iommu_release_ownership() as well

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
index c1a5c366a664..d0df3e5ff5e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ int iommu_take_ownership(struct iommu_table *tbl)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&tbl->large_pool.lock, flags);
 	for (i = 0; i < tbl->nr_pools; i++)
-		spin_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock);
+		spin_lock_nest_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock, &tbl->large_pool.lock);
 
 	iommu_table_release_pages(tbl);
 
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ void iommu_release_ownership(struct iommu_table *tbl)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&tbl->large_pool.lock, flags);
 	for (i = 0; i < tbl->nr_pools; i++)
-		spin_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock);
+		spin_lock_nest_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock, &tbl->large_pool.lock);
 
 	memset(tbl->it_map, 0, sz);
 
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01  6:36 Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2021-04-29 14:01 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210301063653.51003-1-aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH kernel v2] powerpc/iommu: Annotate nested lock for lockdep' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.