All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/radeon/si_dpm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:04:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303190458.GA16321@embeddedor> (raw)

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds by
fixing the following warnings:

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c: In function ‘si_convert_power_state_to_smc’:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2350:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2350 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.MaxPS = (u8)((SISLANDS_DPM2_MAX_PULSE_SKIP * (max_sclk - min_sclk)) / max_sclk);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2351:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2351 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.NearTDPDec = SISLANDS_DPM2_NEAR_TDP_DEC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2352:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2352 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.AboveSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_ABOVE_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2353:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2353 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.BelowSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_BELOW_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2354:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2354 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.PwrEfficiencyRatio = cpu_to_be16(pwr_efficiency_ratio);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:5105:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 5105 |   smc_state->levels[i + 1].aT = cpu_to_be32(a_t);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/603f9a8f.aDLrpMFzzSApzVYQ%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c       |  5 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
index 91bfc4762767..918609551804 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
@@ -5250,10 +5250,9 @@ static int si_upload_sw_state(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	int ret;
 	u32 address = si_pi->state_table_start +
 		offsetof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE, driverState);
-	u32 state_size = sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE) +
-		((new_state->performance_level_count - 1) *
-		 sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL));
 	SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE *smc_state = &si_pi->smc_statetable.driverState;
+	size_t state_size = struct_size(smc_state, levels,
+					new_state->performance_level_count);
 
 	memset(smc_state, 0, state_size);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
index 966e3a556011..fbd6589bdab9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEV
 
 struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
 {
-    uint8_t                             flags;
-    uint8_t                             levelCount;
-    uint8_t                             padding2;
-    uint8_t                             padding3;
-    SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[1];
+	uint8_t                             flags;
+	uint8_t                             levelCount;
+	uint8_t                             padding2;
+	uint8_t                             padding3;
+	SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[];
 };
 
 typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE;
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/radeon/si_dpm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:04:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303190458.GA16321@embeddedor> (raw)

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds by
fixing the following warnings:

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c: In function ‘si_convert_power_state_to_smc’:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2350:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2350 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.MaxPS = (u8)((SISLANDS_DPM2_MAX_PULSE_SKIP * (max_sclk - min_sclk)) / max_sclk);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2351:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2351 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.NearTDPDec = SISLANDS_DPM2_NEAR_TDP_DEC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2352:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2352 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.AboveSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_ABOVE_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2353:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2353 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.BelowSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_BELOW_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2354:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2354 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.PwrEfficiencyRatio = cpu_to_be16(pwr_efficiency_ratio);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:5105:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 5105 |   smc_state->levels[i + 1].aT = cpu_to_be32(a_t);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/603f9a8f.aDLrpMFzzSApzVYQ%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c       |  5 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
index 91bfc4762767..918609551804 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
@@ -5250,10 +5250,9 @@ static int si_upload_sw_state(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	int ret;
 	u32 address = si_pi->state_table_start +
 		offsetof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE, driverState);
-	u32 state_size = sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE) +
-		((new_state->performance_level_count - 1) *
-		 sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL));
 	SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE *smc_state = &si_pi->smc_statetable.driverState;
+	size_t state_size = struct_size(smc_state, levels,
+					new_state->performance_level_count);
 
 	memset(smc_state, 0, state_size);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
index 966e3a556011..fbd6589bdab9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEV
 
 struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
 {
-    uint8_t                             flags;
-    uint8_t                             levelCount;
-    uint8_t                             padding2;
-    uint8_t                             padding3;
-    SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[1];
+	uint8_t                             flags;
+	uint8_t                             levelCount;
+	uint8_t                             padding2;
+	uint8_t                             padding3;
+	SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[];
 };
 
 typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE;
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/radeon/si_dpm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:04:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303190458.GA16321@embeddedor> (raw)

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds by
fixing the following warnings:

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c: In function ‘si_convert_power_state_to_smc’:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2350:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2350 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.MaxPS = (u8)((SISLANDS_DPM2_MAX_PULSE_SKIP * (max_sclk - min_sclk)) / max_sclk);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2351:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2351 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.NearTDPDec = SISLANDS_DPM2_NEAR_TDP_DEC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2352:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2352 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.AboveSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_ABOVE_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2353:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2353 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.BelowSafeInc = SISLANDS_DPM2_BELOW_SAFE_INC;
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:2354:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 2354 |   smc_state->levels[i].dpm2.PwrEfficiencyRatio = cpu_to_be16(pwr_efficiency_ratio);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c:5105:20: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’ {aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
 5105 |   smc_state->levels[i + 1].aT = cpu_to_be32(a_t);
      |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/603f9a8f.aDLrpMFzzSApzVYQ%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c       |  5 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
index 91bfc4762767..918609551804 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
@@ -5250,10 +5250,9 @@ static int si_upload_sw_state(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	int ret;
 	u32 address = si_pi->state_table_start +
 		offsetof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE, driverState);
-	u32 state_size = sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE) +
-		((new_state->performance_level_count - 1) *
-		 sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL));
 	SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE *smc_state = &si_pi->smc_statetable.driverState;
+	size_t state_size = struct_size(smc_state, levels,
+					new_state->performance_level_count);
 
 	memset(smc_state, 0, state_size);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
index 966e3a556011..fbd6589bdab9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sislands_smc.h
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEV
 
 struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
 {
-    uint8_t                             flags;
-    uint8_t                             levelCount;
-    uint8_t                             padding2;
-    uint8_t                             padding3;
-    SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[1];
+	uint8_t                             flags;
+	uint8_t                             levelCount;
+	uint8_t                             padding2;
+	uint8_t                             padding3;
+	SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL   levels[];
 };
 
 typedef struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE;
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03 19:04 Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2021-03-03 19:04 ` [PATCH][next] drm/radeon/si_dpm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-03-03 19:04 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-03-05 19:10 ` Alex Deucher
2021-03-05 19:10   ` Alex Deucher
2021-03-05 19:10   ` Alex Deucher
2021-03-05 19:26   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-03-05 19:26     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-03-05 19:26     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210303190458.GA16321@embeddedor \
    --to=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.