From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:26:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310132623.GO3479805@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEdAw6gnp9XxoWUQ@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:32:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Apart from the above, do we have to warn for something that is a
> debugging aid? A similar concern wrt dump_page which uses pr_warn and
> page owner is using even pr_alert.
> Would it make sense to add a loglevel parameter both into __dump_page
> and dump_page_owner?
No. What would make sense is turning __dump_page() inside-out.
Something like printk("%pP\n");
In lib/vsprintf.c, there's a big switch statement in the function
pointer() that handles printing things like IPv6 addresses, dentries,
and function symbols.
Then we can do whatever we want around the new %pP, including choosing
the log level, adding additional information, choosing to dump the page
to a sysfs file, etc, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 20:20 [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 21:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-08 21:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-08 22:29 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 22:29 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:41 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-03-09 0:41 ` Rong Chen
2021-03-09 2:23 ` [kbuild-all] " Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 2:23 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-09 2:21 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-09 0:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-09 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: page_alloc: alloc_contig_ratelimit() can be static kernel test robot
2021-03-09 0:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-09 9:32 ` [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 16:15 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 16:32 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 17:27 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 15:59 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 7:42 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-10 15:45 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 16:05 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 16:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 17:06 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 18:07 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-03-10 13:54 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210310132623.GO3479805@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.