All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: + x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:58:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310225850.LI9egMIKD%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: x86/vmemmap: drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: x86/vmemmap: drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range

Patch series "Cleanup and fixups for vmemmap handling", v6.

This series contains cleanups to remove dead code that handles unaligned
cases for 4K and 1GB pages (patch#1 and patch#2) when removing the vemmmap
range, and a fix (patch#3) to handle the case when two vmemmap ranges
intersect the same PMD.


This patch (of 4):

remove_pte_table() is prepared to handle the case where either the start
or the end of the range is not PAGE aligned.  This cannot actually happen:

__populate_section_memmap enforces the range to be PMD aligned, so as long
as the size of the struct page remains multiple of 8, the vmemmap range
will be aligned to PAGE_SIZE.

Drop the dead code and place a VM_BUG_ON in vmemmap_{populate,free} to
catch nasty cases.  Note that the VM_BUG_ON is placed in there because
vmemmap_{populate,free= } is the gate of all removing and freeing page
tables logic.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210309214050.4674-1-osalvador@suse.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210309214050.4674-2-osalvador@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |   50 +++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c~x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range
+++ a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -962,7 +962,6 @@ remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsig
 {
 	unsigned long next, pages = 0;
 	pte_t *pte;
-	void *page_addr;
 	phys_addr_t phys_addr;
 
 	pte = pte_start + pte_index(addr);
@@ -983,42 +982,15 @@ remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsig
 		if (phys_addr < (phys_addr_t)0x40000000)
 			return;
 
-		if (PAGE_ALIGNED(addr) && PAGE_ALIGNED(next)) {
-			/*
-			 * Do not free direct mapping pages since they were
-			 * freed when offlining, or simplely not in use.
-			 */
-			if (!direct)
-				free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
-
-			spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
-			pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
-			spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
-
-			/* For non-direct mapping, pages means nothing. */
-			pages++;
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * If we are here, we are freeing vmemmap pages since
-			 * direct mapped memory ranges to be freed are aligned.
-			 *
-			 * If we are not removing the whole page, it means
-			 * other page structs in this page are being used and
-			 * we canot remove them. So fill the unused page_structs
-			 * with 0xFD, and remove the page when it is wholly
-			 * filled with 0xFD.
-			 */
-			memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
-
-			page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
-			if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
-				free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
+		if (!direct)
+			free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
 
-				spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
-				pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
-				spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
-			}
-		}
+		spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+		pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
+		spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+
+		/* For non-direct mapping, pages means nothing. */
+		pages++;
 	}
 
 	/* Call free_pte_table() in remove_pmd_table(). */
@@ -1197,6 +1169,9 @@ remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, un
 void __ref vmemmap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
 {
+	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE));
+	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE));
+
 	remove_pagetable(start, end, false, altmap);
 }
 
@@ -1556,6 +1531,9 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned
 {
 	int err;
 
+	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE));
+	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE));
+
 	if (end - start < PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct page))
 		err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, NULL);
 	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from osalvador@suse.de are

x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-1gb-vmemmap-ranges.patch
x86-vmemmap-handle-unpopulated-sub-pmd-ranges.patch
x86-vmemmap-optimize-for-consecutive-sections-in-partial-populated-pmds.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10 22:58 akpm [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-03  0:08 + x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch added to -mm tree akpm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210310225850.LI9egMIKD%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.