From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:05:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH u-boot v2 32/38] ARM: omap3: fix LTO for DM3730 (and
 possibly other omap3 boards)
In-Reply-To: <CAHCN7xJwi+dshnJ6zx8GHGu=DasbrHJYOBf96K-e792rcHsqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210312103429.25895-1-marek.behun@nic.cz>
 <20210312103429.25895-33-marek.behun@nic.cz>
 <CAHCN7xLyc+Jwb6ekvF7FWq_vzvFCN-oUCwan8LVOTv5x2iPxnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHCN7xJwi+dshnJ6zx8GHGu=DasbrHJYOBf96K-e792rcHsqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20210313170508.638deaf4@nic.cz>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:23:05 -0600
Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have tested this on omap35_logic_somlv and the LTO flag removal
> isn't necessary for the clock.o
> Having the clock built with LTO saves 239 bytes in SPL with my
> compiler.  It's not a huge savings, but in SPL, we need as much as
> possible.

So I can drop this patch?
Marek