From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com (mailout4.zoneedit.com [64.68.198.64]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7675529A2 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8D40C1C; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmo14-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGB_ZuxqQPgG; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.denix.org (pool-100-15-86-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net [100.15.86.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2DAA40A47; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 768A8174544; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:45:12 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Nishanth Menon Message-ID: <20210316184512.GJ18041@denix.org> References: <20210316170857.9547-1-nm@ti.com> <20210316171801.l7ttk4ottbyocpzi@oxidize> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210316171801.l7ttk4ottbyocpzi@oxidize> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: [oe-layersetup][PATCH 0/2] arago-dunfell/dunfell-next: Move to X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:44:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:18:01PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 12:08-20210316, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > I have no idea what ate up my $subject -> I intended to add "Move to > dunfell/dunfell-tip from upstream. > > > > > This brings arago-config and arago-next-config both in sync with latest > > dunfell and dunfell-next tips appropriately. > > > > This series obviously will need to be followed up at an appropriate time > > with a stable commit sha patch to pin things up. > > K, I might be missing the motivation here - the pinning may not be > required given that dunfell is always a rolling config.. and used only > in the cases of exceptions.. So, please ignore my comment. Looks good to me. Praneeth, I see you only merged one of two patches? -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964