From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: david.edmondson@oracle.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:00:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210317180013.235231-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317180013.235231-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
When taking the slow path for mutex acquisition, set the coroutine
value in the CoWaitRecord in push_waiter(), rather than both there and
in the caller.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <20210309144015.557477-4-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
index 5816bf8900..eb73cf11dc 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ static void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(AioContext *ctx,
unsigned old_handoff;
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(mutex, self);
- w.co = self;
push_waiter(mutex, &w);
/* This is the "Responsibility Hand-Off" protocol; a lock() picks from
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 18:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] coroutine-lock: reimplement CoRwlock to fix downgrade bug Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 16:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:19 ` David Edmondson
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] test-coroutine: Add rwlock downgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Max Reitz
2021-03-24 16:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17 12:16 [PATCH v4 " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210317180013.235231-4-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.