From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E90C433C1 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D1E619A2 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230224AbhCVOBe (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:01:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230053AbhCVOAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:00:51 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE2FC061574 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOL6u-0000uu-5A; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:00:48 +0100 Received: from ukl by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOL6t-0005A1-Om; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:00:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:00:47 +0100 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] pwm: Patches I consider ready for the next merge window Message-ID: <20210322140047.26txw6mmgrdljj2h@pengutronix.de> References: <20210319102852.101209-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iyepj4cznmkxevfo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org --iyepj4cznmkxevfo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Thierry, On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > this is the set of patches that are open on the list for some time. > > Lee suggested to resend them. > >=20 > > @Thierry: I'm unsure what is the best way to nag. Is it really > > resending? Or does this just result mostly in overhead because the > > patches are still open in patchwork and it adds copies to your mailbox? > > (Another downside is that taking the patches from this thread results in > > recording a newer Author Date compared to picking up the originals.) >=20 > I use patchwork extensively for tracking, so merely resending patches so > that they float to the top of my inbox isn't useful in itself. Patches > do, by the way, float to the top of my inbox when you just reply to them > (e.g. by pinging). Resending a particular series is fine because it's > then easy to mark the old version as "superseded". Sending a collection > of patch such as this is a bit more annoying because now the duplicates > are spread about a bit more in patchwork, so it's a bit more work to get > patchwork cleaned up. But it's not that bad, so no harm done. >=20 > Usually when I look at patchwork I will look at the A/F/R/T column and > the more flags I see there, the more likely I will be to go and apply > it. Anything else I will go and look at myself and comment and/or apply > or sometimes wait for someone else to review. >=20 > Perhaps a better way to nag me would be to delegate patches that you've > reviewed or think are ready to me, which would make them stand out more > among the others. ok, so my doubts were justified. I'll try the delegation idea next time :-) Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | --iyepj4cznmkxevfo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEfnIqFpAYrP8+dKQLwfwUeK3K7AkFAmBYowwACgkQwfwUeK3K 7AlUXQf+KDqZXOqiL3lwky9cAZmzQdxsNm87lwhsFIUm4bwL2JXFQ6mOAtxw66ts /wBjlttO14M4sP6BNp9voGL87oQ9aeGD294jCsI1tJNHkw3F4QczCd13o5P+Vfs7 JMOHikdy2UaP4kOyRgixIwhomh50R0vKcnxTtghDLuATbvWSjTtO5C1k70Ih+5fy +jFzTWyvewuPF1Qz0y3ha7Vnko+NXxfyfMNKsqsZHlVI7N0Flhc/DLPrRIpGpFGK vbqJbLZ3lY5rLQXftWi0hsojcVmQfnYhTvaFaePO+8FyxL3Ctxq0rpC6CXjJRjsa Qh+y+leyTaL9kWNJZNgjvHiu10lpOg== =zJD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iyepj4cznmkxevfo--