From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430FFC433E2 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D028619DA for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233802AbhCWVld (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:41:33 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35882 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233619AbhCWVjv (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:39:51 -0400 Message-Id: <20210323213708.305191020@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1616535589; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=WQ79W0UKQ3FaQqUk75fa8vxbtUiLoQOfE/l0ic+As9Y=; b=0dwiNOtvsHICNKbN4FI/g8BuGzIsiMoFI0tjDiIMsE5xjeHZ15I/MzIBwWvD0d1i0fuXEK w8u9Cn/rFO7ro+ZlyOHT830q1Qa+gdCHvEcthePOA/Vgoq34EMzUk5XudODwHTIxYmRk4e JndbzldEtV+oruFstumU3tjTR8nMvks7uSWVnpa+OMl4JJGhpspO++yNkLiVwkM2srQ4lD AWHHvlyzdepLt640jN61aOe4IK2AbyWUhDlQqPYntOBAnewzaw1Id3BFsJE9B3fcQsGCGK dk4JDDrDTv3R3El5aq4VpcFaC+MSmZcY4FglWuemmbTJGRdpTo+XMNEN9+2qXw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1616535589; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=WQ79W0UKQ3FaQqUk75fa8vxbtUiLoQOfE/l0ic+As9Y=; b=nwWcJYRQRF+7MxEGrE05poWn6aMKu7zZvnCHFiPWt2Z1UPbbtW4LnPt4hFMfYuMxwhmCy+ X2jeRLHlo0dPVqCA== Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:30:27 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: [patch 08/14] locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs References: <20210323213019.217008708@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org None of these functions is used when CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n. Remove the gunk. Remove pointless comments and clean up the coding style mess while at it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 56 +++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -23,29 +23,25 @@ * @tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree * @pi_tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree * @task: task reference to the blocked task + * @lock: Pointer to the rt_mutex on which the waiter blocks + * @prio: Priority of the waiter + * @deadline: Deadline of the waiter if applicable */ struct rt_mutex_waiter { - struct rb_node tree_entry; - struct rb_node pi_tree_entry; + struct rb_node tree_entry; + struct rb_node pi_tree_entry; struct task_struct *task; struct rt_mutex *lock; - int prio; - u64 deadline; + int prio; + u64 deadline; }; -/* - * Various helpers to access the waiters-tree: - */ - -#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES - static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) { return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters.rb_root); } -static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * -rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock) { struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters); struct rt_mutex_waiter *w = NULL; @@ -62,42 +58,12 @@ static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(st return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters.rb_root); } -static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * -task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p) -{ - return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost, - struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry); -} - -#else - -static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - return false; -} - -static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * -rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - return NULL; -} - -static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p) -{ - return false; -} - -static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * -task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p) +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p) { - return NULL; + return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, + pi_tree_entry); } -#endif - -/* - * lock->owner state tracking: - */ #define RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS 1UL static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)