From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93206C433E6 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EFF61970 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232654AbhC2KKy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:54 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:59675 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231687AbhC2KKe (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:34 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCCB5C0078; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=V8GiiPRto8cFaPsD/oWwdpe/afofgMZJeftVo1w4l8c=; b=wkOwKPNd prOWg63x3C5S4KtB2WY2/zXbTPNqlyZAlq5UyQY1vY031Wd9XoU7rl+jcMnfRFc0 aPEpiHvdUYnSQd8bzZA8Xe6qae74H95E/guMeWdUDteRxVqJmvkdtvWt/AbJdJax phh6GsGQFvZonUM62tOL+OaAlK8NExXYPr9UxWM01nnwdF54/JKh2GaWL+HFzRJD 0ZwYwe+x3D0DTUheDoeVdRT8VeLK1VAjUNr5Fopnt3oEG7C/9DR7zCkEsbZgm2i0 IPXthzMxawdZ8XGs3xk4A4nz+vhP+zxiG4O0oHEZxQrR2GVLnZ0KQQci8Q48Z0m9 DCx++a4vOSKM1w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehkedgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekre dtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudetieevffffveelkeeljeffkefhke ehgfdtffethfelvdejgffghefgveejkefhnecukfhppeekgedrvddvledrudehfedrgeeg necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepihguoh hstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from shredder.mellanox.com (igld-84-229-153-44.inter.net.il [84.229.153.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B17B240054; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Ido Schimmel To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, jiri@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: mlxsw: Test vetoing of double sampling Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:09:48 +0300 Message-Id: <20210329100948.355486-7-idosch@idosch.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210329100948.355486-1-idosch@idosch.org> References: <20210329100948.355486-1-idosch@idosch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Ido Schimmel Test that two sampling rules cannot be configured on the same port with the same trigger. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko --- .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_sample.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_sample.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_sample.sh index 57b05f042787..093bed088ad0 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_sample.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_sample.sh @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding ALL_TESTS=" tc_sample_rate_test tc_sample_max_rate_test + tc_sample_conflict_test tc_sample_group_conflict_test tc_sample_md_iif_test tc_sample_md_lag_iif_test @@ -272,6 +273,35 @@ tc_sample_max_rate_test() log_test "tc sample maximum rate" } +tc_sample_conflict_test() +{ + RET=0 + + # Test that two sampling rules cannot be configured on the same port, + # even when they share the same parameters. + + tc filter add dev $rp1 ingress protocol all pref 1 handle 101 matchall \ + skip_sw action sample rate 1024 group 1 + check_err $? "Failed to configure sampling rule" + + tc filter add dev $rp1 ingress protocol all pref 2 handle 102 matchall \ + skip_sw action sample rate 1024 group 1 &> /dev/null + check_fail $? "Managed to configure second sampling rule" + + # Delete the first rule and make sure the second rule can now be + # configured. + + tc filter del dev $rp1 ingress protocol all pref 1 handle 101 matchall + + tc filter add dev $rp1 ingress protocol all pref 2 handle 102 matchall \ + skip_sw action sample rate 1024 group 1 + check_err $? "Failed to configure sampling rule after deletion" + + log_test "tc sample conflict test" + + tc filter del dev $rp1 ingress protocol all pref 2 handle 102 matchall +} + tc_sample_group_conflict_test() { RET=0 -- 2.30.2