[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
(BMC) side.

Quan Nguyen (3):
  i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
  drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
  bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
(BMC) side.

Quan Nguyen (3):
  i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
  drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
  bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
(BMC) side.

Quan Nguyen (3):
  i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
  drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
  bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v1 1/3] i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use

[Quan Nguyen]

Expose the PEC calculation i2c_smbus_pec() for generic use.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 include/linux/i2c.h          |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
index d2d32c0fd8c3..e5b2d1465e7e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
@@ -37,8 +37,15 @@ static u8 crc8(u16 data)
 	return (u8)(data >> 8);
 }
 
-/* Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p */
-static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
+/**
+ * i2c_smbus_pec - Incremental CRC8 over the given input data array
+ * @crc: previous return crc8 value
+ * @p: pointer to data buffer.
+ * @count: number of bytes in data buffer.
+ *
+ * Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p
+ */
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -46,6 +53,7 @@ static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 		crc = crc8((crc ^ p[i]) << 8);
 	return crc;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_smbus_pec);
 
 /* Assume a 7-bit address, which is reasonable for SMBus */
 static u8 i2c_smbus_msg_pec(u8 pec, struct i2c_msg *msg)
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 56622658b215..0d75e5bcdde6 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ s32 __i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 /* Now follow the 'nice' access routines. These also document the calling
    conventions of i2c_smbus_xfer. */
 
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte(const struct i2c_client *client);
 s32 i2c_smbus_write_byte(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 value);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 command);
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 1/3] i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use

[Quan Nguyen]

Expose the PEC calculation i2c_smbus_pec() for generic use.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 include/linux/i2c.h          |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
index d2d32c0fd8c3..e5b2d1465e7e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
@@ -37,8 +37,15 @@ static u8 crc8(u16 data)
 	return (u8)(data >> 8);
 }
 
-/* Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p */
-static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
+/**
+ * i2c_smbus_pec - Incremental CRC8 over the given input data array
+ * @crc: previous return crc8 value
+ * @p: pointer to data buffer.
+ * @count: number of bytes in data buffer.
+ *
+ * Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p
+ */
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -46,6 +53,7 @@ static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 		crc = crc8((crc ^ p[i]) << 8);
 	return crc;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_smbus_pec);
 
 /* Assume a 7-bit address, which is reasonable for SMBus */
 static u8 i2c_smbus_msg_pec(u8 pec, struct i2c_msg *msg)
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 56622658b215..0d75e5bcdde6 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ s32 __i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 /* Now follow the 'nice' access routines. These also document the calling
    conventions of i2c_smbus_xfer. */
 
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte(const struct i2c_client *client);
 s32 i2c_smbus_write_byte(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 value);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 command);
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 1/3] i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use

[Quan Nguyen]

Expose the PEC calculation i2c_smbus_pec() for generic use.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 include/linux/i2c.h          |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
index d2d32c0fd8c3..e5b2d1465e7e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
@@ -37,8 +37,15 @@ static u8 crc8(u16 data)
 	return (u8)(data >> 8);
 }
 
-/* Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p */
-static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
+/**
+ * i2c_smbus_pec - Incremental CRC8 over the given input data array
+ * @crc: previous return crc8 value
+ * @p: pointer to data buffer.
+ * @count: number of bytes in data buffer.
+ *
+ * Incremental CRC8 over count bytes in the array pointed to by p
+ */
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -46,6 +53,7 @@ static u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count)
 		crc = crc8((crc ^ p[i]) << 8);
 	return crc;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_smbus_pec);
 
 /* Assume a 7-bit address, which is reasonable for SMBus */
 static u8 i2c_smbus_msg_pec(u8 pec, struct i2c_msg *msg)
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 56622658b215..0d75e5bcdde6 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ s32 __i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 /* Now follow the 'nice' access routines. These also document the calling
    conventions of i2c_smbus_xfer. */
 
+u8 i2c_smbus_pec(u8 crc, u8 *p, size_t count);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte(const struct i2c_client *client);
 s32 i2c_smbus_write_byte(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 value);
 s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(const struct i2c_client *client, u8 command);
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.

This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
used as Board Management Controllers.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
 5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
index 07847d9a459a..d67fd204409a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
@@ -133,6 +133,28 @@ config ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC
 	  found on Aspeed SOCs (AST2400 and AST2500). The driver
 	  implements the BMC side of the BT interface.
 
+config SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	tristate "SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  This enables the IPMI SMBus system interface (SSIF) at the
+	  management (BMC) side.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF).
+
+config ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on I2C
+	select SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	select I2C_SLAVE
+	tristate "Aspeed SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  Provides a driver for the SSIF IPMI interface found on
+	  Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF), specific for Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
 config IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE
 	tristate 'IPMB Interface handler'
 	depends on I2C
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
index 0822adc2ec41..05b993f7335b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
@@ -27,3 +27,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC) += bt-bmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_npcm7xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE) += ipmb_dev_int.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc_aspeed.o
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ae6e8750c795
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+/*
+ * Call in WRITE context
+ */
+static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
+	 * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
+	 */
+	ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
+		(ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
+		true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
+
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Call in READ context
+ */
+static int receive_ssif_bmc_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       ssif_bmc->request_available);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (!ssif_bmc->request_available) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+	memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
+			      loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
+	else
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	unsigned int mask = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
+
+	/*
+	 * The request message is now available so userspace application can
+	 * get the request
+	 */
+	if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
+		mask |= POLLIN;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	return mask;
+}
+
+/*
+ * System calls to device interface for user apps
+ */
+static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.read		= ssif_bmc_read,
+	.write		= ssif_bmc_write,
+	.poll		= ssif_bmc_poll,
+	.unlocked_ioctl	= ssif_bmc_ioctl,
+};
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
+
+	/* Request message is available to process */
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
+	/*
+	 * This is the new READ request.
+	 * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
+	 */
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	/* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
+	ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 response_len = 0;
+	int idx = 0;
+	u8 data_len;
+
+	data_len = ssif_bmc->response.len;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		/*
+		 * Read Start length is 32 bytes.
+		 * Read Start transfer first 30 bytes of IPMI response
+		 * and 2 special code 0x00, 0x01.
+		 */
+		*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->remain_len = data_len - MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->block_num = 0;
+
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x00; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x01; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.netfn_lun;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.cmd;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.payload[0];
+
+		response_len = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION - idx;
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx], &ssif_bmc->response.payload[1],
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+		/*
+		 * IPMI READ Middle or READ End messages can carry up to 31 bytes
+		 * IPMI data plus block number byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->remain_len < MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION) {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ End message
+			 *  Return length is the remaining response data length
+			 *  plus block number
+			 *  Block number 0xFF is to indicate this is last message
+			 *
+			 * Return length is: remain response plus block number
+			 */
+			*val = ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num = 0xFF;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			response_len = ssif_bmc->remain_len;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ Middle message
+			 *  Response length is the maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 *  Block number byte is incremented
+			 * Return length is maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 */
+			*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->remain_len -= MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			response_len = MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num++;
+		}
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx],
+		       ssif_bmc->response.payload + 1 + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed,
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
+}
+
+static void set_singlepart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+	/*
+	 * Do not expect the IPMI response has data length 0.
+	 * With some I2C SMBus controllers (Aspeed I2C), return 0 for
+	 * the SMBus Read Request callback might cause bad state for
+	 * the bus. So return 1 byte length so that master will
+	 * resend the Read Request because the length of response is
+	 * less than a normal IPMI response.
+	 *
+	 * Otherwise, return the length of IPMI response
+	 */
+	*val = (buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx]) ? buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx] : 0x1;
+}
+
+/* Process the IPMI response that will be read by master */
+static void handle_read_processed(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 pec_len, addr, len;
+	u8 pec = 0;
+
+	pec_len = ssif_bmc->pec_support ? 1 : 0;
+	/* PEC - Start Read Address */
+	addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+	/* PEC - SSIF Command */
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+	/* PEC - Restart Write Address */
+	addr = addr | 0x01;
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+
+	if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read) {
+		/* Single-part Read processing */
+		buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+		if (ssif_bmc->response.len && ssif_bmc->msg_idx < ssif_bmc->response.len) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+		} else if (ssif_bmc->response.len &&
+			   (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == ssif_bmc->response.len)) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response));
+		} else {
+			*val = 0;
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote it is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx + 1 >= (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) + pec_len))
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+	} else {
+		/* Multi-part Read processing */
+		switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+			buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response_buf;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+			pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n",
+			       ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+			break;
+		}
+		len = (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF) ?
+		       ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1 : MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == (len + 1)) {
+			pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &len, 1);
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, ssif_bmc->response_buf, len);
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote last response is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF &&
+		    ssif_bmc->msg_idx > (ssif_bmc->remain_len + pec_len)) {
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void handle_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 smbus_cmd;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx >= sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return;
+
+	smbus_cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+	switch (smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		/* Single-part write */
+		buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1] = *val;
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+		/* Reset length to zero */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1)
+			ssif_bmc->request.len = 0;
+
+		fallthrough;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		/* Multi-part write, 2nd byte received is length */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1) {
+			ssif_bmc->request.len += *val;
+			ssif_bmc->recv_len = *val;
+		} else {
+			buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 +
+			    ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len]	= *val;
+		}
+
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool validate_pec(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 rpec = 0, cpec = 0;
+	bool ret = true;
+	u8 addr, index;
+	u8 *buf;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		index = ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len;
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2 + index];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->recv_len, 1);
+		/* As SMBus specification does not allow the length
+		 * (byte count) in the Write-Block protocol to be zero.
+		 * Therefore, it is illegal to have the last Middle
+		 * transaction in the sequence carry 32-bytes and have
+		 * a length of ‘0’ in the End transaction.
+		 * But some users may try to use this way and we should
+		 * prevent ssif_bmc driver broken in this case.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->recv_len != 0)
+			cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf + 1 + index, ssif_bmc->recv_len);
+
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+error:
+	/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+	pr_err("Error: Unexpected length received %d\n", ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void complete_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+
+	/* A BMC that receives an invalid PEC shall drop the data for the write
+	 * transaction and any further transactions (read or write) until
+	 * the next valid read or write Start transaction is received
+	 */
+	if (!validate_pec(ssif_bmc)) {
+		pr_err("Received invalid PEC\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE || cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END)
+		handle_request(ssif_bmc);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Callback function to handle I2C slave events
+ */
+static int ssif_bmc_cb(struct i2c_client *client, enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	spin_lock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	/* I2C Event Handler:
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED	0x0
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED	0x1
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED	0x2
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED	0x3
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_STOP		0x4
+	 */
+	switch (event) {
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read)
+			set_singlepart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		else
+			set_multipart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
+		handle_read_processed(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
+		/*
+		 * First byte is SMBUS command, not a part of SSIF message.
+		 * SSIF request buffer starts with msg_idx 1 for the first
+		 *  buffer byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 0) {
+			/* SMBUS command can vary (single or multi-part) */
+			ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd = *val;
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+		} else {
+			handle_write_received(ssif_bmc, val);
+		}
+
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
+		/*
+		 * PEC byte is appended at the end of each transaction.
+		 * Detect PEC is support or not after receiving write request
+		 * completely.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->last_event == I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED)
+			complete_write_received(ssif_bmc);
+		/* Reset message index */
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+	ssif_bmc->last_event = event;
+	spin_unlock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+	int ret;
+
+	ssif_bmc = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ssif_bmc) + sizeof_priv, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ssif_bmc)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	spin_lock_init(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+
+	mutex_init(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	/* Register misc device interface */
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.name = DEVICE_NAME;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.fops = &ssif_bmc_fops;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.parent = &client->dev;
+	ret = misc_register(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ssif_bmc->client = client;
+	ssif_bmc->client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_SLAVE;
+
+	/* Register I2C slave */
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, ssif_bmc);
+	ret = i2c_slave_register(client, ssif_bmc_cb);
+	if (ret) {
+		misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	return ssif_bmc;
+
+out:
+	devm_kfree(&client->dev, ssif_bmc);
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssif_bmc_alloc);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of the BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a2ee090572db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+#ifndef __SSIF_BMC_H__
+#define __SSIF_BMC_H__
+
+#define DEVICE_NAME				"ipmi-ssif-host"
+
+#define GET_8BIT_ADDR(addr_7bit)		(((addr_7bit) << 1) & 0xff)
+
+#define MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX			252
+
+/* A standard SMBus Transaction is limited to 32 data bytes */
+#define MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION		32
+
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION	30
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION	31
+
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE		0x2
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_READ		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START		0x6
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE	0x7
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END		0x8
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE		0x9
+
+struct ssif_msg {
+	u8 len;
+	u8 netfn_lun;
+	u8 cmd;
+	u8 payload[MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX];
+} __packed;
+
+static inline u32 ssif_msg_len(struct ssif_msg *ssif_msg)
+{
+	return ssif_msg->len + 1;
+}
+
+#define SSIF_BMC_BUSY   0x01
+#define SSIF_BMC_READY  0x02
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx {
+	struct i2c_client	*client;
+	struct miscdevice	miscdev;
+	u8			smbus_cmd;
+	struct ssif_msg		request;
+	bool			request_available;
+	struct ssif_msg		response;
+	bool			response_in_progress;
+	/* Response buffer for Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			response_buf[MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION];
+	/* Flag to identify a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	bool			is_singlepart_read;
+	u8			nbytes_processed;
+	u8			remain_len;
+	u8			recv_len;
+	/* Block Number of a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			block_num;
+	size_t			msg_idx;
+	enum i2c_slave_event	last_event;
+	bool			pec_support;
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	wait_queue_head_t	wait_queue;
+	struct mutex		file_mutex;
+	void (*set_ssif_bmc_status)(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int flags);
+	void			*priv;
+};
+
+static inline struct ssif_bmc_ctx *to_ssif_bmc(struct file *file)
+{
+	return container_of(file->private_data, struct ssif_bmc_ctx, miscdev);
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv);
+
+#endif /* __SSIF_BMC_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..02abfca90986
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of Aspeed SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+struct aspeed_i2c_bus {
+	struct i2c_adapter              adap;
+	struct device                   *dev;
+	void __iomem                    *base;
+	struct reset_control            *rst;
+	/* Synchronizes I/O mem access to base. */
+	spinlock_t                      lock;
+};
+
+#define ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG	0x0c
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH	BIT(7)
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE	BIT(2)
+void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask | mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask & ~mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
+{
+	struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	bus = (struct aspeed_i2c_bus *)ssif_bmc->priv;
+	if (!bus)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
+
+	if (status & SSIF_BMC_BUSY) {
+		/* Ignore RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave busy processing */
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	} else if (status & SSIF_BMC_READY) {
+		/* Enable RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave ready */
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+
+	ssif_bmc = ssif_bmc_alloc(client, sizeof(struct aspeed_i2c_bus));
+	if (IS_ERR(ssif_bmc))
+		return PTR_ERR(ssif_bmc);
+
+	ssif_bmc->priv = i2c_get_adapdata(client->adapter);
+	ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status = aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	i2c_slave_unregister(client);
+	misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id ssif_bmc_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc" },
+	{ },
+};
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id ssif_bmc_id[] = {
+	{ DEVICE_NAME, 0 },
+	{ },
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ssif_bmc_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver ssif_bmc_driver = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name		= DEVICE_NAME,
+		.of_match_table = ssif_bmc_match,
+	},
+	.probe		= ssif_bmc_probe,
+	.remove		= ssif_bmc_remove,
+	.id_table	= ssif_bmc_id,
+};
+
+module_i2c_driver(ssif_bmc_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of Aspeed BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.

This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
used as Board Management Controllers.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
 5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
index 07847d9a459a..d67fd204409a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
@@ -133,6 +133,28 @@ config ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC
 	  found on Aspeed SOCs (AST2400 and AST2500). The driver
 	  implements the BMC side of the BT interface.
 
+config SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	tristate "SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  This enables the IPMI SMBus system interface (SSIF) at the
+	  management (BMC) side.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF).
+
+config ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on I2C
+	select SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	select I2C_SLAVE
+	tristate "Aspeed SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  Provides a driver for the SSIF IPMI interface found on
+	  Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF), specific for Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
 config IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE
 	tristate 'IPMB Interface handler'
 	depends on I2C
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
index 0822adc2ec41..05b993f7335b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
@@ -27,3 +27,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC) += bt-bmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_npcm7xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE) += ipmb_dev_int.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc_aspeed.o
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ae6e8750c795
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+/*
+ * Call in WRITE context
+ */
+static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
+	 * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
+	 */
+	ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
+		(ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
+		true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
+
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Call in READ context
+ */
+static int receive_ssif_bmc_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       ssif_bmc->request_available);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (!ssif_bmc->request_available) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+	memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
+			      loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
+	else
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	unsigned int mask = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
+
+	/*
+	 * The request message is now available so userspace application can
+	 * get the request
+	 */
+	if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
+		mask |= POLLIN;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	return mask;
+}
+
+/*
+ * System calls to device interface for user apps
+ */
+static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.read		= ssif_bmc_read,
+	.write		= ssif_bmc_write,
+	.poll		= ssif_bmc_poll,
+	.unlocked_ioctl	= ssif_bmc_ioctl,
+};
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
+
+	/* Request message is available to process */
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
+	/*
+	 * This is the new READ request.
+	 * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
+	 */
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	/* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
+	ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 response_len = 0;
+	int idx = 0;
+	u8 data_len;
+
+	data_len = ssif_bmc->response.len;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		/*
+		 * Read Start length is 32 bytes.
+		 * Read Start transfer first 30 bytes of IPMI response
+		 * and 2 special code 0x00, 0x01.
+		 */
+		*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->remain_len = data_len - MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->block_num = 0;
+
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x00; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x01; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.netfn_lun;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.cmd;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.payload[0];
+
+		response_len = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION - idx;
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx], &ssif_bmc->response.payload[1],
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+		/*
+		 * IPMI READ Middle or READ End messages can carry up to 31 bytes
+		 * IPMI data plus block number byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->remain_len < MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION) {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ End message
+			 *  Return length is the remaining response data length
+			 *  plus block number
+			 *  Block number 0xFF is to indicate this is last message
+			 *
+			 * Return length is: remain response plus block number
+			 */
+			*val = ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num = 0xFF;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			response_len = ssif_bmc->remain_len;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ Middle message
+			 *  Response length is the maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 *  Block number byte is incremented
+			 * Return length is maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 */
+			*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->remain_len -= MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			response_len = MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num++;
+		}
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx],
+		       ssif_bmc->response.payload + 1 + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed,
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
+}
+
+static void set_singlepart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+	/*
+	 * Do not expect the IPMI response has data length 0.
+	 * With some I2C SMBus controllers (Aspeed I2C), return 0 for
+	 * the SMBus Read Request callback might cause bad state for
+	 * the bus. So return 1 byte length so that master will
+	 * resend the Read Request because the length of response is
+	 * less than a normal IPMI response.
+	 *
+	 * Otherwise, return the length of IPMI response
+	 */
+	*val = (buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx]) ? buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx] : 0x1;
+}
+
+/* Process the IPMI response that will be read by master */
+static void handle_read_processed(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 pec_len, addr, len;
+	u8 pec = 0;
+
+	pec_len = ssif_bmc->pec_support ? 1 : 0;
+	/* PEC - Start Read Address */
+	addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+	/* PEC - SSIF Command */
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+	/* PEC - Restart Write Address */
+	addr = addr | 0x01;
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+
+	if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read) {
+		/* Single-part Read processing */
+		buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+		if (ssif_bmc->response.len && ssif_bmc->msg_idx < ssif_bmc->response.len) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+		} else if (ssif_bmc->response.len &&
+			   (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == ssif_bmc->response.len)) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response));
+		} else {
+			*val = 0;
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote it is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx + 1 >= (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) + pec_len))
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+	} else {
+		/* Multi-part Read processing */
+		switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+			buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response_buf;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+			pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n",
+			       ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+			break;
+		}
+		len = (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF) ?
+		       ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1 : MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == (len + 1)) {
+			pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &len, 1);
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, ssif_bmc->response_buf, len);
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote last response is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF &&
+		    ssif_bmc->msg_idx > (ssif_bmc->remain_len + pec_len)) {
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void handle_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 smbus_cmd;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx >= sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return;
+
+	smbus_cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+	switch (smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		/* Single-part write */
+		buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1] = *val;
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+		/* Reset length to zero */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1)
+			ssif_bmc->request.len = 0;
+
+		fallthrough;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		/* Multi-part write, 2nd byte received is length */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1) {
+			ssif_bmc->request.len += *val;
+			ssif_bmc->recv_len = *val;
+		} else {
+			buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 +
+			    ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len]	= *val;
+		}
+
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool validate_pec(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 rpec = 0, cpec = 0;
+	bool ret = true;
+	u8 addr, index;
+	u8 *buf;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		index = ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len;
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2 + index];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->recv_len, 1);
+		/* As SMBus specification does not allow the length
+		 * (byte count) in the Write-Block protocol to be zero.
+		 * Therefore, it is illegal to have the last Middle
+		 * transaction in the sequence carry 32-bytes and have
+		 * a length of ‘0’ in the End transaction.
+		 * But some users may try to use this way and we should
+		 * prevent ssif_bmc driver broken in this case.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->recv_len != 0)
+			cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf + 1 + index, ssif_bmc->recv_len);
+
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+error:
+	/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+	pr_err("Error: Unexpected length received %d\n", ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void complete_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+
+	/* A BMC that receives an invalid PEC shall drop the data for the write
+	 * transaction and any further transactions (read or write) until
+	 * the next valid read or write Start transaction is received
+	 */
+	if (!validate_pec(ssif_bmc)) {
+		pr_err("Received invalid PEC\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE || cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END)
+		handle_request(ssif_bmc);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Callback function to handle I2C slave events
+ */
+static int ssif_bmc_cb(struct i2c_client *client, enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	spin_lock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	/* I2C Event Handler:
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED	0x0
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED	0x1
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED	0x2
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED	0x3
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_STOP		0x4
+	 */
+	switch (event) {
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read)
+			set_singlepart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		else
+			set_multipart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
+		handle_read_processed(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
+		/*
+		 * First byte is SMBUS command, not a part of SSIF message.
+		 * SSIF request buffer starts with msg_idx 1 for the first
+		 *  buffer byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 0) {
+			/* SMBUS command can vary (single or multi-part) */
+			ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd = *val;
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+		} else {
+			handle_write_received(ssif_bmc, val);
+		}
+
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
+		/*
+		 * PEC byte is appended at the end of each transaction.
+		 * Detect PEC is support or not after receiving write request
+		 * completely.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->last_event == I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED)
+			complete_write_received(ssif_bmc);
+		/* Reset message index */
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+	ssif_bmc->last_event = event;
+	spin_unlock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+	int ret;
+
+	ssif_bmc = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ssif_bmc) + sizeof_priv, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ssif_bmc)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	spin_lock_init(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+
+	mutex_init(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	/* Register misc device interface */
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.name = DEVICE_NAME;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.fops = &ssif_bmc_fops;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.parent = &client->dev;
+	ret = misc_register(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ssif_bmc->client = client;
+	ssif_bmc->client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_SLAVE;
+
+	/* Register I2C slave */
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, ssif_bmc);
+	ret = i2c_slave_register(client, ssif_bmc_cb);
+	if (ret) {
+		misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	return ssif_bmc;
+
+out:
+	devm_kfree(&client->dev, ssif_bmc);
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssif_bmc_alloc);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of the BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a2ee090572db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+#ifndef __SSIF_BMC_H__
+#define __SSIF_BMC_H__
+
+#define DEVICE_NAME				"ipmi-ssif-host"
+
+#define GET_8BIT_ADDR(addr_7bit)		(((addr_7bit) << 1) & 0xff)
+
+#define MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX			252
+
+/* A standard SMBus Transaction is limited to 32 data bytes */
+#define MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION		32
+
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION	30
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION	31
+
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE		0x2
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_READ		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START		0x6
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE	0x7
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END		0x8
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE		0x9
+
+struct ssif_msg {
+	u8 len;
+	u8 netfn_lun;
+	u8 cmd;
+	u8 payload[MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX];
+} __packed;
+
+static inline u32 ssif_msg_len(struct ssif_msg *ssif_msg)
+{
+	return ssif_msg->len + 1;
+}
+
+#define SSIF_BMC_BUSY   0x01
+#define SSIF_BMC_READY  0x02
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx {
+	struct i2c_client	*client;
+	struct miscdevice	miscdev;
+	u8			smbus_cmd;
+	struct ssif_msg		request;
+	bool			request_available;
+	struct ssif_msg		response;
+	bool			response_in_progress;
+	/* Response buffer for Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			response_buf[MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION];
+	/* Flag to identify a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	bool			is_singlepart_read;
+	u8			nbytes_processed;
+	u8			remain_len;
+	u8			recv_len;
+	/* Block Number of a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			block_num;
+	size_t			msg_idx;
+	enum i2c_slave_event	last_event;
+	bool			pec_support;
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	wait_queue_head_t	wait_queue;
+	struct mutex		file_mutex;
+	void (*set_ssif_bmc_status)(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int flags);
+	void			*priv;
+};
+
+static inline struct ssif_bmc_ctx *to_ssif_bmc(struct file *file)
+{
+	return container_of(file->private_data, struct ssif_bmc_ctx, miscdev);
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv);
+
+#endif /* __SSIF_BMC_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..02abfca90986
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of Aspeed SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+struct aspeed_i2c_bus {
+	struct i2c_adapter              adap;
+	struct device                   *dev;
+	void __iomem                    *base;
+	struct reset_control            *rst;
+	/* Synchronizes I/O mem access to base. */
+	spinlock_t                      lock;
+};
+
+#define ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG	0x0c
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH	BIT(7)
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE	BIT(2)
+void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask | mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask & ~mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
+{
+	struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	bus = (struct aspeed_i2c_bus *)ssif_bmc->priv;
+	if (!bus)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
+
+	if (status & SSIF_BMC_BUSY) {
+		/* Ignore RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave busy processing */
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	} else if (status & SSIF_BMC_READY) {
+		/* Enable RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave ready */
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+
+	ssif_bmc = ssif_bmc_alloc(client, sizeof(struct aspeed_i2c_bus));
+	if (IS_ERR(ssif_bmc))
+		return PTR_ERR(ssif_bmc);
+
+	ssif_bmc->priv = i2c_get_adapdata(client->adapter);
+	ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status = aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	i2c_slave_unregister(client);
+	misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id ssif_bmc_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc" },
+	{ },
+};
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id ssif_bmc_id[] = {
+	{ DEVICE_NAME, 0 },
+	{ },
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ssif_bmc_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver ssif_bmc_driver = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name		= DEVICE_NAME,
+		.of_match_table = ssif_bmc_match,
+	},
+	.probe		= ssif_bmc_probe,
+	.remove		= ssif_bmc_remove,
+	.id_table	= ssif_bmc_id,
+};
+
+module_i2c_driver(ssif_bmc_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of Aspeed BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.

This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
used as Board Management Controllers.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
 5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
index 07847d9a459a..d67fd204409a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
@@ -133,6 +133,28 @@ config ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC
 	  found on Aspeed SOCs (AST2400 and AST2500). The driver
 	  implements the BMC side of the BT interface.
 
+config SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	tristate "SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  This enables the IPMI SMBus system interface (SSIF) at the
+	  management (BMC) side.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF).
+
+config ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on I2C
+	select SSIF_IPMI_BMC
+	select I2C_SLAVE
+	tristate "Aspeed SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
+	help
+	  Provides a driver for the SSIF IPMI interface found on
+	  Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
+	  The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
+	  interface (SSIF), specific for Aspeed AST2500 SoC.
+
 config IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE
 	tristate 'IPMB Interface handler'
 	depends on I2C
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
index 0822adc2ec41..05b993f7335b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
@@ -27,3 +27,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC) += bt-bmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_aspeed.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_npcm7xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE) += ipmb_dev_int.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc_aspeed.o
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ae6e8750c795
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+/*
+ * Call in WRITE context
+ */
+static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
+	 * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
+	 */
+	ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
+		(ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
+		true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
+
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Call in READ context
+ */
+static int receive_ssif_bmc_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!non_blocking) {
+retry:
+		ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
+					       ssif_bmc->request_available);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (!ssif_bmc->request_available) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		if (non_blocking)
+			return -EAGAIN;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+	memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
+static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
+			      loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	struct ssif_msg msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
+	else
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
+}
+
+static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
+	unsigned int mask = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
+
+	/*
+	 * The request message is now available so userspace application can
+	 * get the request
+	 */
+	if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
+		mask |= POLLIN;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+	return mask;
+}
+
+/*
+ * System calls to device interface for user apps
+ */
+static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.read		= ssif_bmc_read,
+	.write		= ssif_bmc_write,
+	.poll		= ssif_bmc_poll,
+	.unlocked_ioctl	= ssif_bmc_ioctl,
+};
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
+		ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
+
+	/* Request message is available to process */
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
+	/*
+	 * This is the new READ request.
+	 * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
+	 */
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
+static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	/* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
+	ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
+	ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
+	memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
+	wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 response_len = 0;
+	int idx = 0;
+	u8 data_len;
+
+	data_len = ssif_bmc->response.len;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		/*
+		 * Read Start length is 32 bytes.
+		 * Read Start transfer first 30 bytes of IPMI response
+		 * and 2 special code 0x00, 0x01.
+		 */
+		*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->remain_len = data_len - MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION;
+		ssif_bmc->block_num = 0;
+
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x00; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x01; /* Start Flag */
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.netfn_lun;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.cmd;
+		ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.payload[0];
+
+		response_len = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION - idx;
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx], &ssif_bmc->response.payload[1],
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+		/*
+		 * IPMI READ Middle or READ End messages can carry up to 31 bytes
+		 * IPMI data plus block number byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->remain_len < MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION) {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ End message
+			 *  Return length is the remaining response data length
+			 *  plus block number
+			 *  Block number 0xFF is to indicate this is last message
+			 *
+			 * Return length is: remain response plus block number
+			 */
+			*val = ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num = 0xFF;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			response_len = ssif_bmc->remain_len;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * This is READ Middle message
+			 *  Response length is the maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 *  Block number byte is incremented
+			 * Return length is maximum SMBUS transfer length
+			 */
+			*val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->remain_len -= MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			response_len = MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
+			ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
+			ssif_bmc->block_num++;
+		}
+
+		memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx],
+		       ssif_bmc->response.payload + 1 + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed,
+		       response_len);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
+}
+
+static void set_singlepart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+	/*
+	 * Do not expect the IPMI response has data length 0.
+	 * With some I2C SMBus controllers (Aspeed I2C), return 0 for
+	 * the SMBus Read Request callback might cause bad state for
+	 * the bus. So return 1 byte length so that master will
+	 * resend the Read Request because the length of response is
+	 * less than a normal IPMI response.
+	 *
+	 * Otherwise, return the length of IPMI response
+	 */
+	*val = (buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx]) ? buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx] : 0x1;
+}
+
+/* Process the IPMI response that will be read by master */
+static void handle_read_processed(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 pec_len, addr, len;
+	u8 pec = 0;
+
+	pec_len = ssif_bmc->pec_support ? 1 : 0;
+	/* PEC - Start Read Address */
+	addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+	/* PEC - SSIF Command */
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+	/* PEC - Restart Write Address */
+	addr = addr | 0x01;
+	pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
+
+	if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read) {
+		/* Single-part Read processing */
+		buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
+
+		if (ssif_bmc->response.len && ssif_bmc->msg_idx < ssif_bmc->response.len) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+		} else if (ssif_bmc->response.len &&
+			   (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == ssif_bmc->response.len)) {
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response));
+		} else {
+			*val = 0;
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote it is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx + 1 >= (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) + pec_len))
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+	} else {
+		/* Multi-part Read processing */
+		switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
+		case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
+			buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response_buf;
+			*val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+			pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n",
+			       ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+			break;
+		}
+		len = (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF) ?
+		       ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1 : MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == (len + 1)) {
+			pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &len, 1);
+			*val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, ssif_bmc->response_buf, len);
+		}
+		/* Invalidate response buffer to denote last response is sent */
+		if (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF &&
+		    ssif_bmc->msg_idx > (ssif_bmc->remain_len + pec_len)) {
+			complete_response(ssif_bmc);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void handle_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
+{
+	u8 *buf;
+	u8 smbus_cmd;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx >= sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
+		return;
+
+	smbus_cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+	switch (smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		/* Single-part write */
+		buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1] = *val;
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+		/* Reset length to zero */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1)
+			ssif_bmc->request.len = 0;
+
+		fallthrough;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		/* Multi-part write, 2nd byte received is length */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1) {
+			ssif_bmc->request.len += *val;
+			ssif_bmc->recv_len = *val;
+		} else {
+			buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 +
+			    ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len]	= *val;
+		}
+
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+		pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool validate_pec(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 rpec = 0, cpec = 0;
+	bool ret = true;
+	u8 addr, index;
+	u8 *buf;
+
+	buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
+	switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
+	case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
+	case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
+		index = ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len;
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
+			/* PEC is not included */
+			ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
+			return true;
+		}
+
+		if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1))
+			goto error;
+
+		/* PEC is included */
+		ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
+		rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2 + index];
+		addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
+		cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->recv_len, 1);
+		/* As SMBus specification does not allow the length
+		 * (byte count) in the Write-Block protocol to be zero.
+		 * Therefore, it is illegal to have the last Middle
+		 * transaction in the sequence carry 32-bytes and have
+		 * a length of ‘0’ in the End transaction.
+		 * But some users may try to use this way and we should
+		 * prevent ssif_bmc driver broken in this case.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->recv_len != 0)
+			cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf + 1 + index, ssif_bmc->recv_len);
+
+		if (rpec != cpec) {
+			pr_err("Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
+			ret = false;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+error:
+	/* Do not expect to go to this case */
+	pr_err("Error: Unexpected length received %d\n", ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void complete_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
+{
+	u8 cmd = ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd;
+
+	/* A BMC that receives an invalid PEC shall drop the data for the write
+	 * transaction and any further transactions (read or write) until
+	 * the next valid read or write Start transaction is received
+	 */
+	if (!validate_pec(ssif_bmc)) {
+		pr_err("Received invalid PEC\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE || cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END)
+		handle_request(ssif_bmc);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Callback function to handle I2C slave events
+ */
+static int ssif_bmc_cb(struct i2c_client *client, enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	spin_lock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	/* I2C Event Handler:
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED	0x0
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED	0x1
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED	0x2
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED	0x3
+	 *   I2C_SLAVE_STOP		0x4
+	 */
+	switch (event) {
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read)
+			set_singlepart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		else
+			set_multipart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
+		handle_read_processed(ssif_bmc, val);
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
+		/*
+		 * First byte is SMBUS command, not a part of SSIF message.
+		 * SSIF request buffer starts with msg_idx 1 for the first
+		 *  buffer byte.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 0) {
+			/* SMBUS command can vary (single or multi-part) */
+			ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd = *val;
+			ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
+		} else {
+			handle_write_received(ssif_bmc, val);
+		}
+
+		break;
+
+	case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
+		/*
+		 * PEC byte is appended at the end of each transaction.
+		 * Detect PEC is support or not after receiving write request
+		 * completely.
+		 */
+		if (ssif_bmc->last_event == I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED)
+			complete_write_received(ssif_bmc);
+		/* Reset message index */
+		ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+	ssif_bmc->last_event = event;
+	spin_unlock(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+	int ret;
+
+	ssif_bmc = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ssif_bmc) + sizeof_priv, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ssif_bmc)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	spin_lock_init(&ssif_bmc->lock);
+
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
+	ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
+	ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
+
+	mutex_init(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
+
+	/* Register misc device interface */
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.name = DEVICE_NAME;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.fops = &ssif_bmc_fops;
+	ssif_bmc->miscdev.parent = &client->dev;
+	ret = misc_register(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ssif_bmc->client = client;
+	ssif_bmc->client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_SLAVE;
+
+	/* Register I2C slave */
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, ssif_bmc);
+	ret = i2c_slave_register(client, ssif_bmc_cb);
+	if (ret) {
+		misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	return ssif_bmc;
+
+out:
+	devm_kfree(&client->dev, ssif_bmc);
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssif_bmc_alloc);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of the BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a2ee090572db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+#ifndef __SSIF_BMC_H__
+#define __SSIF_BMC_H__
+
+#define DEVICE_NAME				"ipmi-ssif-host"
+
+#define GET_8BIT_ADDR(addr_7bit)		(((addr_7bit) << 1) & 0xff)
+
+#define MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX			252
+
+/* A standard SMBus Transaction is limited to 32 data bytes */
+#define MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION		32
+
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION	30
+#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION	31
+
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE		0x2
+#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_READ		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START		0x6
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE	0x7
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END		0x8
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START		0x3
+#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE		0x9
+
+struct ssif_msg {
+	u8 len;
+	u8 netfn_lun;
+	u8 cmd;
+	u8 payload[MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX];
+} __packed;
+
+static inline u32 ssif_msg_len(struct ssif_msg *ssif_msg)
+{
+	return ssif_msg->len + 1;
+}
+
+#define SSIF_BMC_BUSY   0x01
+#define SSIF_BMC_READY  0x02
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx {
+	struct i2c_client	*client;
+	struct miscdevice	miscdev;
+	u8			smbus_cmd;
+	struct ssif_msg		request;
+	bool			request_available;
+	struct ssif_msg		response;
+	bool			response_in_progress;
+	/* Response buffer for Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			response_buf[MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION];
+	/* Flag to identify a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	bool			is_singlepart_read;
+	u8			nbytes_processed;
+	u8			remain_len;
+	u8			recv_len;
+	/* Block Number of a Multi-part Read Transaction */
+	u8			block_num;
+	size_t			msg_idx;
+	enum i2c_slave_event	last_event;
+	bool			pec_support;
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	wait_queue_head_t	wait_queue;
+	struct mutex		file_mutex;
+	void (*set_ssif_bmc_status)(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int flags);
+	void			*priv;
+};
+
+static inline struct ssif_bmc_ctx *to_ssif_bmc(struct file *file)
+{
+	return container_of(file->private_data, struct ssif_bmc_ctx, miscdev);
+}
+
+struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc_alloc(struct i2c_client *client, int sizeof_priv);
+
+#endif /* __SSIF_BMC_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..02abfca90986
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * The driver for BMC side of Aspeed SSIF interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+
+#include "ssif_bmc.h"
+
+struct aspeed_i2c_bus {
+	struct i2c_adapter              adap;
+	struct device                   *dev;
+	void __iomem                    *base;
+	struct reset_control            *rst;
+	/* Synchronizes I/O mem access to base. */
+	spinlock_t                      lock;
+};
+
+#define ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG	0x0c
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH	BIT(7)
+#define ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE	BIT(2)
+void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask | mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long current_mask;
+
+	current_mask = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+	writel(current_mask & ~mask, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
+}
+
+void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
+{
+	struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	bus = (struct aspeed_i2c_bus *)ssif_bmc->priv;
+	if (!bus)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
+
+	if (status & SSIF_BMC_BUSY) {
+		/* Ignore RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave busy processing */
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	} else if (status & SSIF_BMC_READY) {
+		/* Enable RX_DONE and SLAVE_MATCH when slave ready */
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE);
+		aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(bus, ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
+
+	ssif_bmc = ssif_bmc_alloc(client, sizeof(struct aspeed_i2c_bus));
+	if (IS_ERR(ssif_bmc))
+		return PTR_ERR(ssif_bmc);
+
+	ssif_bmc->priv = i2c_get_adapdata(client->adapter);
+	ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status = aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ssif_bmc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	i2c_slave_unregister(client);
+	misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id ssif_bmc_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc" },
+	{ },
+};
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id ssif_bmc_id[] = {
+	{ DEVICE_NAME, 0 },
+	{ },
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ssif_bmc_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver ssif_bmc_driver = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name		= DEVICE_NAME,
+		.of_match_table = ssif_bmc_match,
+	},
+	.probe		= ssif_bmc_probe,
+	.remove		= ssif_bmc_remove,
+	.id_table	= ssif_bmc_id,
+};
+
+module_i2c_driver(ssif_bmc_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of Aspeed BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
+
+The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
+and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
+with their host.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be
+       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
+- reg: I2C address the registers
+
+Example:
+
+       ssif-bmc@10 {
+               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
+               reg = <0x10>;
+       };
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
+
+The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
+and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
+with their host.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be
+       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
+- reg: I2C address the registers
+
+Example:
+
+       ssif-bmc@10 {
+               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
+               reg = <0x10>;
+       };
-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.

Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
+
+The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
+and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
+with their host.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be
+       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
+- reg: I2C address the registers
+
+Example:
+
+       ssif-bmc@10 {
+               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
+               reg = <0x10>;
+       };
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]

Hi Quan,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[also build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next ipmi/for-next v5.12-rc5 next-20210329]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git d72260cc7879c72c186900e7c153007a6137ed8e
config: arc-randconfig-r024-20210330 (attached as .config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
        git checkout c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arceb-elf-ld: lib/stackdepot.o: in function `filter_irq_stacks':
   stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_alloc':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_cb':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o:ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): more undefined references to `i2c_smbus_pec' follow
--
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:41:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      41 | void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:49:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      49 | void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:57:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      57 | void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31109 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]

Hi Quan,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[also build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next ipmi/for-next v5.12-rc5 next-20210329]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git d72260cc7879c72c186900e7c153007a6137ed8e
config: arc-randconfig-r024-20210330 (attached as .config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
        git checkout c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arceb-elf-ld: lib/stackdepot.o: in function `filter_irq_stacks':
   stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_alloc':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_cb':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o:ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): more undefined references to `i2c_smbus_pec' follow
--
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:41:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      41 | void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:49:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      49 | void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:57:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      57 | void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31109 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4096 bytes --]

Hi Quan,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[also build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next ipmi/for-next v5.12-rc5 next-20210329]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git d72260cc7879c72c186900e7c153007a6137ed8e
config: arc-randconfig-r024-20210330 (attached as .config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Quan-Nguyen/Add-Aspeed-SSIF-BMC-driver/20210329-202143
        git checkout c640bd37ce66eb1364922be61ac3a46108952438
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arceb-elf-ld: lib/stackdepot.o: in function `filter_irq_stacks':
   stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x5a): undefined reference to `__irqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x62): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_start'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: stackdepot.c:(.text+0x6a): undefined reference to `__softirqentry_text_end'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_alloc':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x51e): undefined reference to `i2c_slave_register'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o: in function `ssif_bmc_cb':
>> ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
>> arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6c2): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_pec'
   arceb-elf-ld: drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.o:ssif_bmc.c:(.text+0x6d6): more undefined references to `i2c_smbus_pec' follow
--
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:41:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      41 | void aspeed_i2c_enable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:49:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      49 | void aspeed_i2c_disable_interrupt(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, unsigned long mask)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c:57:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      57 | void aspeed_set_ssif_bmc_status(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, unsigned int status)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31109 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 07:17:59PM +0700, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++

Bindings should now be in DT schema format.

>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
> +
> +The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
> +and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
> +with their host.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be
> +       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
> +- reg: I2C address the registers
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +       ssif-bmc@10 {
> +               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
> +               reg = <0x10>;
> +       };
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 07:17:59PM +0700, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++

Bindings should now be in DT schema format.

>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
> +
> +The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
> +and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
> +with their host.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be
> +       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
> +- reg: I2C address the registers
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +       ssif-bmc@10 {
> +               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
> +               reg = <0x10>;
> +       };
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 07:17:59PM +0700, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> Add device tree binding document for the Aspeed SSIF BMC driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++

Bindings should now be in DT schema format.

>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1616f0188db9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +# Aspeed SSIF (SMBus system interface) IPMI BMC interface
> +
> +The Aspeed AST2500 are commonly used as BMCs (Baseboard Management Controllers)
> +and the SSIF slave interface can be used to perform in-band IPMI communication
> +with their host.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be
> +       "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc"
> +- reg: I2C address the registers
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +       ssif-bmc@10 {
> +               compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc";
> +               reg = <0x10>;
> +       };
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Joel Stanley]

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>
> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
> used as Board Management Controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>

I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
general things I noticed when reading it.

> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
patch form the ssif framework.

> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.

> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
> +{
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!non_blocking) {
> +retry:
> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);

What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
Should it also be sending some data in this function?

> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +               if (non_blocking)
> +                       return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +               goto retry;

The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
quite follow what the spinlock is doing.

while (1) {
    if (blocking) {
        ret = wait_event_interruptible();
        if (ret)
             return ret;
    }

     spin_lock_irqsave()
     if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
         spin_lock_irqrestore()
         if (!blocking)
             return -EAGAIN;
     } else {
        spin_lock_irqrestore()
        break;
     }
}


> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
> +        */
> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */

I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?

The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.

> +
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);

->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?

> +
> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
than or equal to struct ssif_msg?

> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
> +                             loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))

Is that test correct?

> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
> +       else
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
> +{

If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.

> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
> +        * get the request
> +        */
> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
> +               mask |= POLLIN;
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       return mask;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
> + */
> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
> +};
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
> +
> +       /* Request message is available to process */
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
> +       /*
> +        * This is the new READ request.
> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
> +        */
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> +{

> +       default:
> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);

Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.

> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
> +}
> +

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Joel Stanley]

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>
> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
> used as Board Management Controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>

I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
general things I noticed when reading it.

> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
patch form the ssif framework.

> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.

> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
> +{
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!non_blocking) {
> +retry:
> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);

What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
Should it also be sending some data in this function?

> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +               if (non_blocking)
> +                       return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +               goto retry;

The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
quite follow what the spinlock is doing.

while (1) {
    if (blocking) {
        ret = wait_event_interruptible();
        if (ret)
             return ret;
    }

     spin_lock_irqsave()
     if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
         spin_lock_irqrestore()
         if (!blocking)
             return -EAGAIN;
     } else {
        spin_lock_irqrestore()
        break;
     }
}


> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
> +        */
> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */

I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?

The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.

> +
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);

->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?

> +
> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
than or equal to struct ssif_msg?

> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
> +                             loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))

Is that test correct?

> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
> +       else
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
> +{

If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.

> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
> +        * get the request
> +        */
> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
> +               mask |= POLLIN;
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       return mask;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
> + */
> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
> +};
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
> +
> +       /* Request message is available to process */
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
> +       /*
> +        * This is the new READ request.
> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
> +        */
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> +{

> +       default:
> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);

Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.

> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
> +}
> +

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Joel Stanley]

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>
> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
> used as Board Management Controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>

I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
general things I noticed when reading it.

> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
patch form the ssif framework.

> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.

> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
> +{
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!non_blocking) {
> +retry:
> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);

What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
Should it also be sending some data in this function?

> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +               if (non_blocking)
> +                       return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +               goto retry;

The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
quite follow what the spinlock is doing.

while (1) {
    if (blocking) {
        ret = wait_event_interruptible();
        if (ret)
             return ret;
    }

     spin_lock_irqsave()
     if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
         spin_lock_irqrestore()
         if (!blocking)
             return -EAGAIN;
     } else {
        spin_lock_irqrestore()
        break;
     }
}


> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
> +        */
> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */

I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?

The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.

> +
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);

->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?

> +
> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
than or equal to struct ssif_msg?

> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
> +                             loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       ssize_t ret;
> +
> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))

Is that test correct?

> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
> +       else
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> +
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
> +}
> +
> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
> +{

If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.

> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
> +        * get the request
> +        */
> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
> +               mask |= POLLIN;
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> +       return mask;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
> + */
> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
> +};
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
> +
> +       /* Request message is available to process */
> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
> +       /*
> +        * This is the new READ request.
> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
> +        */
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)

Could return void.

> +{
> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
> +{

> +       default:
> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);

Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.

> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
> +}
> +

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

On 31/03/2021 14:21, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>
>> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
>> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>>
>> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
>> used as Board Management Controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> 
> I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
> general things I noticed when reading it.
> 

Thank you, Joel,
I'm really appreciate your comments for this patch series.

And, as there is a compilation error detected by kernel robot test, I 
was hurry to send out v2 just to fix that just before your email 
arrived. So I'd like to address all comments in my upcoming v3.


>> ---
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>>   5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
> 
> It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
> patch form the ssif framework.
> 
Yes, will do in next version

>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
>> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> 
> You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.
> 
My bad, will remove in next version

>> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       if (!non_blocking) {
>> +retry:
>> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
>> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
>> +               if (ret)
>> +                       return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> 
> What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
> to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
> Should it also be sending some data in this function?
> 
The lock is to make sure ssif_bmc->response_in_progress are completely 
processed, ie: when the lock already released.
My concern is that reference to that value without acquiring lock may 
not be true as it is under other possess.

In fact, the lock here is for the whole data pointed by ssif_bmc 
pointer. Hence, every reference/modify to this data must be done with 
the lock acquired.

>> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +               if (non_blocking)
>> +                       return -EAGAIN;
>> +
>> +               goto retry;
> 
> The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
> quite follow what the spinlock is doing.
> 
> while (1) {
>      if (blocking) {
>          ret = wait_event_interruptible();
>          if (ret)
>               return ret;
>      }
> 
>       spin_lock_irqsave()
>       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>           spin_lock_irqrestore()
>           if (!blocking)
>               return -EAGAIN;
>       } else {
>          spin_lock_irqrestore()
>          break;
>       }
> }
> 
> 
I'm afraid we would need to re-acquire the lock before modifying 
ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read and ssif_bmc->response_in_progress below.

>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
>> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
>> +        */
>> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
>> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
>> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
> 
> I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?
> 
> The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.
> 
The comment indeed does not provide any info here. Will change back to 
if else statement and add more meaningful comment if necessary in next 
version.

>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> 
> ->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
> the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?
> 

The current use is to serialize access among read()/write()/poll().

About enforcing open() to return -EBUSY to protect the device against 
more than one user, we can either implement follow example of 
drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c OR drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c

But I'm still wonder what should be better between atomic_t open_count 
(bt_bmc.c) or simply reuse the file_mutex similar with kcs_bmc.c.

>> +
>> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
> 
> count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
> than or equal to struct ssif_msg?
> 

The size of struct ssif_msg is 255 bytes, and the ssif_msg_len() should 
always return less than this number unless the ssif_msg->len is wrong 
and exceeded the size of struct ssif_msg.

For safe I think it should be changed to the min among count, 
sizeof(struct ssif_msg), and return value of 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request).
ie:
count = min_t(ssize_t, count, min_t(ssize_t, sizeof(struct ssif_msg), 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

>> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
>> +                             loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
> 
> Is that test correct?
> 
As the "if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))" above ensure the data will 
not exceeded the size of buffer, ie: sizeof ssif_msg, we can now to make 
sure the actually data size to agree with ssif_msg->len, ie: the return 
of ssif_msg_len().

But as this test looked "not easy to read" so I think I will fix this to:

    if (count < ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
         ret = -EINVAL;
    else
         memcpy(...);

Hope this way made it easier to read.

>> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
>> +       else
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
>> +{
> 
> If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.
> 
Will remove this in next version

>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
>> +        * get the request
>> +        */
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
>> +               mask |= POLLIN;
>> +
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       return mask;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
>> + */
>> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
>> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
>> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
>> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
>> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
> 
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
>> +
>> +       /* Request message is available to process */
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
>> +       /*
>> +        * This is the new READ request.
>> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
>> +        */
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
>
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
>> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
> 
>> +       default:
>> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
> 
> Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.
> 

Will try to use dev_err() in next version

>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
>> +}
>> +

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

On 31/03/2021 14:21, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>
>> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
>> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>>
>> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
>> used as Board Management Controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> 
> I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
> general things I noticed when reading it.
> 

Thank you, Joel,
I'm really appreciate your comments for this patch series.

And, as there is a compilation error detected by kernel robot test, I 
was hurry to send out v2 just to fix that just before your email 
arrived. So I'd like to address all comments in my upcoming v3.


>> ---
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>>   5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
> 
> It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
> patch form the ssif framework.
> 
Yes, will do in next version

>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
>> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> 
> You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.
> 
My bad, will remove in next version

>> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       if (!non_blocking) {
>> +retry:
>> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
>> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
>> +               if (ret)
>> +                       return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> 
> What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
> to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
> Should it also be sending some data in this function?
> 
The lock is to make sure ssif_bmc->response_in_progress are completely 
processed, ie: when the lock already released.
My concern is that reference to that value without acquiring lock may 
not be true as it is under other possess.

In fact, the lock here is for the whole data pointed by ssif_bmc 
pointer. Hence, every reference/modify to this data must be done with 
the lock acquired.

>> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +               if (non_blocking)
>> +                       return -EAGAIN;
>> +
>> +               goto retry;
> 
> The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
> quite follow what the spinlock is doing.
> 
> while (1) {
>      if (blocking) {
>          ret = wait_event_interruptible();
>          if (ret)
>               return ret;
>      }
> 
>       spin_lock_irqsave()
>       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>           spin_lock_irqrestore()
>           if (!blocking)
>               return -EAGAIN;
>       } else {
>          spin_lock_irqrestore()
>          break;
>       }
> }
> 
> 
I'm afraid we would need to re-acquire the lock before modifying 
ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read and ssif_bmc->response_in_progress below.

>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
>> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
>> +        */
>> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
>> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
>> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
> 
> I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?
> 
> The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.
> 
The comment indeed does not provide any info here. Will change back to 
if else statement and add more meaningful comment if necessary in next 
version.

>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> 
> ->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
> the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?
> 

The current use is to serialize access among read()/write()/poll().

About enforcing open() to return -EBUSY to protect the device against 
more than one user, we can either implement follow example of 
drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c OR drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c

But I'm still wonder what should be better between atomic_t open_count 
(bt_bmc.c) or simply reuse the file_mutex similar with kcs_bmc.c.

>> +
>> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
> 
> count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
> than or equal to struct ssif_msg?
> 

The size of struct ssif_msg is 255 bytes, and the ssif_msg_len() should 
always return less than this number unless the ssif_msg->len is wrong 
and exceeded the size of struct ssif_msg.

For safe I think it should be changed to the min among count, 
sizeof(struct ssif_msg), and return value of 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request).
ie:
count = min_t(ssize_t, count, min_t(ssize_t, sizeof(struct ssif_msg), 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

>> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
>> +                             loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
> 
> Is that test correct?
> 
As the "if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))" above ensure the data will 
not exceeded the size of buffer, ie: sizeof ssif_msg, we can now to make 
sure the actually data size to agree with ssif_msg->len, ie: the return 
of ssif_msg_len().

But as this test looked "not easy to read" so I think I will fix this to:

    if (count < ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
         ret = -EINVAL;
    else
         memcpy(...);

Hope this way made it easier to read.

>> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
>> +       else
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
>> +{
> 
> If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.
> 
Will remove this in next version

>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
>> +        * get the request
>> +        */
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
>> +               mask |= POLLIN;
>> +
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       return mask;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
>> + */
>> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
>> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
>> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
>> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
>> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
> 
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
>> +
>> +       /* Request message is available to process */
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
>> +       /*
>> +        * This is the new READ request.
>> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
>> +        */
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
>
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
>> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
> 
>> +       default:
>> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
> 
> Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.
> 

Will try to use dev_err() in next version

>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
>> +}
>> +

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

On 31/03/2021 14:21, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 12:18, Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>
>> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
>> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>>
>> This commits adds support specifically for Aspeed AST2500 which commonly
>> used as Board Management Controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>
> 
> I don't have any SSIF or IPMI related feedback on your patch, but some
> general things I noticed when reading it.
> 

Thank you, Joel,
I'm really appreciate your comments for this patch series.

And, as there is a compilation error detected by kernel robot test, I 
was hurry to send out v2 just to fix that just before your email 
arrived. So I'd like to address all comments in my upcoming v3.


>> ---
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig           |  22 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile          |   2 +
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c        | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h        |  92 ++++
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c | 132 ++++++
>>   5 files changed, 893 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
> 
> It would make sense to split the aspeed implementation into a separate
> patch form the ssif framework.
> 
Yes, will do in next version

>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Ampere Computing LLC
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
>> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> 
> You should omit the licence text; it is replaced by the SPDX tags.
> 
My bad, will remove in next version

>> +static int send_ssif_bmc_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, bool non_blocking)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       if (!non_blocking) {
>> +retry:
>> +               ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
>> +                                              !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
>> +               if (ret)
>> +                       return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
> 
> What's the lock doing here? We've just waited for response_in_progress
> to be false, so we then take the lock to check what value it is?
> Should it also be sending some data in this function?
> 
The lock is to make sure ssif_bmc->response_in_progress are completely 
processed, ie: when the lock already released.
My concern is that reference to that value without acquiring lock may 
not be true as it is under other possess.

In fact, the lock here is for the whole data pointed by ssif_bmc 
pointer. Hence, every reference/modify to this data must be done with 
the lock acquired.

>> +       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +               if (non_blocking)
>> +                       return -EAGAIN;
>> +
>> +               goto retry;
> 
> The goto threw me, so I tried re-writing it without. Again, I don't
> quite follow what the spinlock is doing.
> 
> while (1) {
>      if (blocking) {
>          ret = wait_event_interruptible();
>          if (ret)
>               return ret;
>      }
> 
>       spin_lock_irqsave()
>       if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>           spin_lock_irqrestore()
>           if (!blocking)
>               return -EAGAIN;
>       } else {
>          spin_lock_irqrestore()
>          break;
>       }
> }
> 
> 
I'm afraid we would need to re-acquire the lock before modifying 
ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read and ssif_bmc->response_in_progress below.

>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Check the response data length from userspace to determine the type
>> +        * of the response message whether it is single-part or multi-part.
>> +        */
>> +       ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read =
>> +               (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) <= (MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1)) ?
>> +               true : false; /* 1: byte of length */
> 
> I don't follow the 1: byte of length comment, what is it telling me?
> 
> The ternary operator is a bit messy here, I'd go for a good old if statement.
> 
The comment indeed does not provide any info here. Will change back to 
if else statement and add more meaningful comment if necessary in next 
version.

>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
> 
> ->file_mutex is protecting the device against more than one user of
> the character device? Can you enforce that in open() instead?
> 

The current use is to serialize access among read()/write()/poll().

About enforcing open() to return -EBUSY to protect the device against 
more than one user, we can either implement follow example of 
drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c OR drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c

But I'm still wonder what should be better between atomic_t open_count 
(bt_bmc.c) or simply reuse the file_mutex similar with kcs_bmc.c.

>> +
>> +       ret = receive_ssif_bmc_request(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       count = min_t(ssize_t, count, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
> 
> count is user controlled, so I assume ssif_msg_len will always be less
> than or equal to struct ssif_msg?
> 

The size of struct ssif_msg is 255 bytes, and the ssif_msg_len() should 
always return less than this number unless the ssif_msg->len is wrong 
and exceeded the size of struct ssif_msg.

For safe I think it should be changed to the min among count, 
sizeof(struct ssif_msg), and return value of 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request).
ie:
count = min_t(ssize_t, count, min_t(ssize_t, sizeof(struct ssif_msg), 
ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));

>> +       memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
>> +                             loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       struct ssif_msg msg;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +       if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +       if (count >= ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
> 
> Is that test correct?
> 
As the "if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))" above ensure the data will 
not exceeded the size of buffer, ie: sizeof ssif_msg, we can now to make 
sure the actually data size to agree with ssif_msg->len, ie: the return 
of ssif_msg_len().

But as this test looked "not easy to read" so I think I will fix this to:

    if (count < ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response))
         ret = -EINVAL;
    else
         memcpy(...);

Hope this way made it easier to read.

>> +               memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
>> +       else
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       ret = send_ssif_bmc_response(ssif_bmc, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> +       if (!ret && ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_READY);
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long ssif_bmc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long param)
>> +{
> 
> If you're not using this I suspect you should omit the callback.
> 
Will remove this in next version

>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> +{
>> +       struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +       unsigned int mask = 0;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * The request message is now available so userspace application can
>> +        * get the request
>> +        */
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
>> +               mask |= POLLIN;
>> +
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ssif_bmc->file_mutex);
>> +       return mask;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
>> + */
>> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
>> +       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>> +       .read           = ssif_bmc_read,
>> +       .write          = ssif_bmc_write,
>> +       .poll           = ssif_bmc_poll,
>> +       .unlocked_ioctl = ssif_bmc_ioctl,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
> 
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       if (ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status)
>> +               ssif_bmc->set_ssif_bmc_status(ssif_bmc, SSIF_BMC_BUSY);
>> +
>> +       /* Request message is available to process */
>> +       ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
>> +       /*
>> +        * This is the new READ request.
>> +        * Clear the response buffer of the previous transaction
>> +        */
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static int complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
> 
> Could return void.
>
Will do in next version

>> +{
>> +       /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
>> +       ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
>> +       ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
>> +       memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
>> +       wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
> 
>> +       default:
>> +               /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> +               pr_err("Error: Unexpected SMBus command received 0x%x\n", ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
> 
> Use dev_err if you can, so the message is associated with the device.
> 

Will try to use dev_err() in next version

>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
>> +}
>> +


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

Please ignore this series as I have missed an important audience.

Going to resend another series. My apology.
- Quan

On 29/03/2021 19:09, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
> is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
> (BMC) side.
> 
> Quan Nguyen (3):
>    i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
>    drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
>    bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
> 
>   .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
>   drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
>   include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
>   8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
> 

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

Please ignore this series as I have missed an important audience.

Going to resend another series. My apology.
- Quan

On 29/03/2021 19:09, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
> is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
> (BMC) side.
> 
> Quan Nguyen (3):
>    i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
>    drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
>    bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
> 
>   .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
>   drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
>   include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
>   8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>   create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
(BMC) side.

Quan Nguyen (3):
  i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
  drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
  bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH v1 0/3] Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

[Quan Nguyen]

This series add support for the Aspeed specific SSIF BMC driver which
is to perform in-band IPMI communication with the host in management
(BMC) side.

Quan Nguyen (3):
  i2c: i2c-core-smbus: Expose PEC calculate function for generic use
  drivers: char: ipmi: Add Aspeed SSIF BMC driver
  bindings: ipmi: Add binding for Aspeed SSIF BMC driver

 .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt         |  18 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig                     |  22 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile                    |   2 +
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c                  | 645 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h                  |  92 +++
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c           | 132 ++++
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 922 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-ssif-bmc.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc_aspeed.c

-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel